NVIDIA vs. AMD: AI/Data Center Positioning, Valuation, and Oversold Technical Signals Analysis

#nvidia #amd #ai_chips #data_center #stock_valuation #technical_signals #oversold_conditions #market_dominance #growth_potential #regulatory_risks
Mixed
US Stock
December 24, 2025

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

NVIDIA vs. AMD: AI/Data Center Positioning, Valuation, and Oversold Technical Signals Analysis

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

NVDA
--
NVDA
--
AMD
--
AMD
--
Integrated Analysis

Both NVIDIA and AMD experienced significant pullbacks from their October 29, 2025 peaks: NVIDIA fell ~17.7% to a low of $169.55 by December 19, 2025, while AMD declined ~26.5% to $194.28 over the same period [0]. Valuation metrics highlight a stark contrast: NVIDIA trades at a forward P/E of 25x (11th percentile of its 10-year valuation range), making it relatively undervalued compared to peers [1]. In contrast, AMD commands a premium 42x forward P/E (2026E) based on consensus EPS projections of ~$5.12 [3].

In the AI/data center segment, NVIDIA maintains an 80-90% dominant market share, generating $51.2B in data center revenue (90% of total sales) with a 73.6% gross margin in Q3 FY2026 (ended October 2025) [2]. AMD’s data center revenue reached $4.3B in Q3 2025 (46.5% of total revenue) and is poised for growth after securing a multi-year partnership with OpenAI to deploy up to 6 gigawatts of Instinct GPUs starting in 2H 2026 [3][4]. Technical analysis shows both stocks traded sideways from October to December 2025, with KDJ indicators signaling bullish momentum and pullbacks suggesting oversold conditions [0].

Key Insights
  1. NVIDIA’s Valuation Attractiveness
    : With its 25x forward P/E below big tech peers and dominant market position, NVIDIA offers stable AI exposure for investors prioritizing valuation and market leadership [5].
  2. AMD’s Growth Potential
    : The OpenAI partnership (valued at $90–100B over time) and 31% projected 2026 revenue growth justify its premium valuation, though execution risk remains high for meeting large-scale deployment deadlines [3].
  3. Shared Regulatory Risks
    : Both companies face potential AI chip export restrictions (notably to China), which could impact revenue streams and market dynamics [2].
Risks & Opportunities
  • Risks
    : Regulatory restrictions on AI chip exports pose a significant headwind for both [2]. AMD must execute on its OpenAI GPU deployment timeline to deliver on growth expectations [3], while NVIDIA faces pressure to maintain its market share amid increasing competition. Sector-wide valuation volatility could lead to further pullbacks if growth targets are unmet.
  • Opportunities
    : NVIDIA’s undervalued 25x forward P/E presents an opportunity for investors seeking discounted AI exposure [1]. AMD’s OpenAI partnership offers a path to accelerated growth and market share gains in the AI chip segment [3].
Key Information Summary

This analysis synthesizes the following critical data:

  • NVIDIA: ~17.7% pullback from peak, 25x forward P/E, 80-90% AI chip market share, $51.2B Q3 data center revenue, 73.6% gross margin
  • AMD: ~26.5% pullback from peak, 42x forward P/E, $4.3B Q3 data center revenue, OpenAI partnership for up to 6GW GPUs, 31% projected 2026 revenue growth
  • Both stocks exhibit oversold technical signals and face shared regulatory risks, with AMD carrying additional execution risk for its partnership deliverables.

No prescriptive investment recommendations are provided; this analysis is for informational purposes to support decision-making.

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.