Analysis of the Impact of Institutional Derivative Hedging Strategies on A-Share Market Volatility and Slow Bull Pattern

Based on the obtained data, I will systematically analyze how institutional derivative hedging strategies reshape the volatility characteristics of the A-share market and promote the formation of a slow bull pattern.

In recent years, the A-share derivatives market has developed rapidly, forming a complete product system including stock index futures (IF, IC, IM), stock index options, ETF options, etc.:

• Stock Index Futures
  : CSI 300 (IF), CSI 500 (IC), and CSI 1000 (IM) futures provide institutions with primary hedging tools
• ETF Options
  : Including SSE 50 ETF, CSI 300 ETF, etc. The recent launch of A500 ETF options has further enriched the toolbox
• Stock Index Options
  : Provide institutions with more flexible volatility trading and hedging methods

According to market data [0,1]:

• Institutional investors have become the dominant force in the derivatives market
• Hedge funds, public funds, insurance funds, etc. widely use derivatives for risk management
• Derivative hedging has become a standard configuration of institutional investment strategies

: Institutions adopt Delta-neutral strategies to hedge spot risks by dynamically adjusting futures and options positions:

1. When rising
   : Institutions sell futures/call options for hedging, providing selling pressure
2. When falling
   : Institutions close hedging positions, providing buying support

This ‘buy low, sell high’ hedging operation naturally stabilizes the market and smooths market volatility.

Institutions manage volatility through the following strategies [1]:

• Volatility Selling Strategy
  : Sell options when volatility is too high to earn volatility premium
• Gamma Scalping
  : Capture Gamma returns through dynamic hedging
• Volatility Mean Reversion
  : Arbitrage when implied volatility deviates from historical mean

These strategies increase market depth and improve price discovery efficiency.

The long-term backwardation of CSI 500 (IC) and CSI 1000 (IM) futures reflects:

1. Strong hedging demand
   : Institutions hold a large number of small and medium-cap stocks, needing to pay hedging costs through futures backwardation
2. Risk premium mechanism
   : Backwardation is essentially a risk premium paid by hedgers to speculators
3. Market structure optimization
   : Backwardation attracts arbitrage funds and improves market liquidity

According to market analysis [2,3,4]:

Key Indicator Changes:
- Intraday Volatility Decline: A-share intraday amplitude has narrowed significantly
- Implied Volatility Lower: Option implied volatility is at a historical low
- VIX Index Downward: Reflects reduced market panic
- Maximum Drawdown Narrowed: Market adjustment range is mild

• The market presents a slow rise pattern of ‘two steps forward, one step back’
• Avoided the past ‘boom and bust’ phenomenon
• MSCI China Index rose 20% in 2025, but volatility is significantly lower than historical levels [2]

• AI-related sectors lead gains, traditional industries lag [5]
• Institutional funds rotate between sectors instead of pushing up the index comprehensively
• Derivative hedging allows institutions to dare to hold growth stocks

• Regulators adjust market rhythm through derivative tools [2]
• Measures such as removing some short-selling restrictions increase two-way trading opportunities
• ‘Encourage long-term capital entry’ and ‘prevent excessive speculation’ go hand in hand

:

• Competing for option issuance rights is essentially competing for dominance of volatility trading
• Option market makers influence the spot market through hedging strategies
• This competition improves market efficiency but may also lead to short-term volatility

Market Structure Transformation:
Retail Era → Institutional Era
Feature: Emotional → Feature: Rational
Behavior: Chase Gains & Sell Losses → Behavior: Hedge & Risk Management
Result: Boom & Bust → Result: Stable Slow Bull

Institutions have achieved through derivatives:

1. Precise Risk Management
   : Can precisely control portfolio risk exposures such as Beta, Gamma, Vega
2. Diversified Income Sources
   : No longer rely solely on directional returns, can profit from multiple dimensions such as volatility and time value
3. Longer Holding Period
   : With hedging protection, institutions dare to hold high-quality assets for a long time

The improvement of the derivatives market has brought:

• Cash-Futures Arbitrage
  : Eliminate cash-futures spreads and improve pricing efficiency
• Cross-Product Arbitrage
  : Promote price consistency between different markets
• Volatility Pricing
  : Make the market’s pricing of risk more accurate

1. Continuous Enrichment of Tools
   : More derivative products will be launched successively
2. Institutionalization Trend
   : Long-term capital continues to enter the market
3. Mature Regulation
   : Regulators have a deeper understanding of the derivatives market
4. Investor Education
   : Market participants are more rational

1. Hedging Crowding
   : If institutional hedging strategies are overly convergent, it may amplify risks
2. Liquidity Risk
   : Hedging may fail in extreme markets
3. Policy Intervention
   : Over-regulation may affect market efficiency
4. External Shocks
   : Geopolitical and other black swan events

First Stage (Completed): Derivatives Market Establishment
Second Stage (Current): Institutional Hedging Strategy Maturation
Third Stage (Future): Comprehensive Risk Management System Establishment

To judge whether the slow bull pattern is sustainable, we need to pay attention to:

1. Volatility Level
   : Whether it remains in a reasonable range
2. Backwardation Structure
   : Whether it reflects real hedging demand
3. Trading Volume
   : Coordination between derivatives and spot trading volumes
4. Institutional Behavior
   : Diversity of hedging strategies

[1] Jinling API Data - A-share market transaction data and derivative information
[2] Bloomberg - “US stock volatility is making China’s markets look good, Goldman Sachs says” (https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/us-stock-market-volatility-china-rally-tariffs-deepseek-goldman-sachs-2025-3)
[3] Bloomberg - “China Eyes Curbs on Stock Speculation to Foster Steady Gains” (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-04/china-weighs-curbs-on-stock-speculation-to-foster-steady-gains)
[4] AInvest - “The Role of Household Savings in Sustaining China’s Stock Market Rally” (https://www.ainvest.com/news/role-household-savings-sustaining-china-stock-market-rally-2509/)
[5] Bloomberg - “China A500 ETFs Inflows Surge to Record High Toward Year End” (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-12-19/china-a500-etfs-inflows-surge-to-record-high-toward-year-end)
[6] Bloomberg - “Six Charts That Show How Stock Markets Got Reshaped in 2025” (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-12-19/six-charts-that-show-how-stock-markets-got-reshaped-in-2025)

---

: Institutions are profoundly changing the ecology of the A-share market using derivative hedging strategies. Through hedging mechanisms, institutions have gradually transformed the traditional ‘boom and bust’ model into a ‘steady slow bull’ pattern. This transformation not only reduces market volatility but also improves market efficiency and risk pricing capabilities. In the future, with the further improvement of derivative tools and the increase of institutionalization, the A-share market is expected to form a more mature and stable slow bull pattern.