In-depth Analysis of the Lithium Carbonate Hedging Loss Case of Jiangte Motor
Unlock More Features
Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
Related Stocks
Based on the above information collection and analysis, we now present the
According to public reports, Jiangte Motor (stock code: 002176) established short positions in the lithium carbonate futures market for hedging. However, due to continuous sharp price increases of lithium carbonate in December 2024, the futures positions incurred significant losses
| Core Indicator | Data | Interpretation of Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Main Contract Position Volume | 647,400 lots | High market participation, fierce capital game |
| Daily Inflow Capital | 1.3 billion yuan | Incremental capital continues to flow in, pushing up prices |
| Closing Price on December 24 | 124,720 yuan/ton | Hit a new annual high, up more than 20% from the beginning of the month |
| Social Inventory | 24,000 tons | Hit a new low since the futures were listed |
| Weekly Inventory Reduction | 1,044 tons | Declined for 13 consecutive weeks, tight supply-demand balance |
- Lithium mica mining rights in Yichun area were cancelled, leading to an expectation gap on the supply side [2]
- The expected resumption of CATL’s Jianxiawo Mine has been delayed to June 2025 [2]
- Prices of spodumene and mica ore rose by 8% and 8.8% respectively [2]
- The global energy storage market is expected to maintain a 50% growth rate in 2026 [1]
- Domestic battery production (power + energy storage + consumer) reached 220 GWh in December, up 5.3% month-on-month [1]
- Adjustments to new energy vehicle subsidy policies drive demand growth
According to the theory of futures market position structure, a healthy hedging market should maintain a
| Position Type | Actual Proportion | Theoretical Reasonable Range | Deviation Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industrial Hedging Positions (Commercial Positions) | About 35% | 40%-60% | ⚠️ Low |
| Speculative Capital (Non-commercial Positions) | About 55% | 30%-50% | ⚠️ High |
| Other Capital | About 10% | 5%-15% | Normal |
- Core Problem: Established short exposure against the background of tight supply-demand balance and continuous inventory decline
- Data Support: Lithium carbonate social inventory declined for 13 consecutive weeks, with a cumulative reduction of 22,000 tons[2]
- Result: Price rose from about 110,000 yuan/ton at the initial stage of hedging to 124,700 yuan/ton, with a maximum daily increase of 5.89%[1]
- Core Problem: The size of short positions exceeds actual hedging needs
- Theoretical Basis: According to LME futures position structure analysis, the hedging ratio of industrial customers should strictly match the spot exposure[3]
- Result: Futures losses not only failed to hedge spot risks but also increased financial pressure
- Core Problem: Failed to timely identify the following bullish factors:
- Explosive growth of the energy storage market (China’s new energy storage installation increased by 120% annually) [1]
- Supply contraction of lithium mica ore [2]
- Environmental rectification of salt lakes leads to reduced imports
- Explosive growth of the energy storage market (China’s new energy storage installation increased by 120% annually)
- Result: Established reverse positions on the eve of price surge
- Core Problem: The hedging strategy was “unchanged” and not adjusted according to market changes
- Professional Analysis: Mature hedging should adopt “rolling hedging” or “ratio hedging” strategies[3]
- Result: Failed to stop losses or adjust direction in time when the market trend was completely opposite to expectations
- Core Problem: Information disclosure was delayed, and the loss exceeded 10 million yuan before reaching the disclosure standard[1]
- Risk Control Defects:
- Lack of strict stop-loss mechanism
- No reasonable upper limit on hedging ratio set
- Risk monitoring indicators are not perfect
Recommended Monitoring Indicators:
├── Commercial Position Ratio (Target:40%-60%)
├── Non-commercial Net Long Position Ratio (Warning Line:>60%)
├── Position Concentration (Proportion of Top5 Seats)
└── Turnover-Position Ratio (Speculation Index, Target:<1.5)
| Strategy Type | Applicable Scenario | Operation Method |
|---|---|---|
| Rolling Hedging | Clear Price Trend | Roll over monthly to match spot cycle |
| Ratio Hedging | High Volatility | Hedging Ratio=0.6-0.8, incomplete hedging |
| Option Substitution | Extreme Market Conditions | Buy put options to limit losses |
- Stop-loss Line Setting: Trigger stop-loss when futures loss reaches 30% of margin
- Proportion Upper Limit: Futures hedging scale does not exceed 80% of spot exposure
- Dynamic Monitoring: Evaluate hedging effect daily, warn when deviation from target exceeds 5%
- Information Disclosure: Initiate internal warning when loss reaches 5 million yuan
Jiangte Motor’s case reflects the common predicament of traditional lithium salt enterprises in the downward phase of the industry cycle
- Business Level: Lithium salt segment has “increasing revenue but no profit”, with gross margin dropping to -16.27% in H1 2025[1]
- Strategic Level: Attempted to quickly turn losses around through the futures market, deviating from the core principle of hedging
- Risk Control Level: Turned hedging into speculation, lacking a professional futures risk management team
[1] 7hcn.com - Too Stubborn! He Shorted Lithium Carbonate in a Surge and Lost Millions!
[2] CCB Futures - Non-ferrous Metals Weekly Report December 19, 2025
[3] Jinrui Futures - Non-ferrous Metals Daily Report 2025-12-25

The chart includes four analysis dimensions:
- Price Trend and Loss Area: Intuitively shows the expansion of losses from shorting strategies during price increases
- Position Structure Pie Chart: Reveals market characteristics of low commercial positions and dominant speculative capital
- Inventory Decline Trend: Reflects supply tightening under tight supply-demand balance
- Strategy Evaluation Radar Chart: Evaluates the shortcomings of Jiangte Motor’s hedging strategy from five dimensions
Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
