Ginlix AI
50% OFF

Analysis of H-share Shareholders' Opposition Incident and Core Capital Adequacy Ratio Risks of Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank

#banking #capital_adequacy #governance_risk #shareholder_rights #esg #risk_analysis #hong_kong_listed #rural_commercial_bank
Negative
A-Share
December 28, 2025

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

Analysis of H-share Shareholders' Opposition Incident and Core Capital Adequacy Ratio Risks of Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

03618
--
03618
--

Based on the collected information, I will conduct a systematic analysis for you.


Analysis of H-share Shareholders’ Opposition Incident and Core Capital Adequacy Ratio Risks of Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank
I. Event Background and Core Controversies

On December 10, 2025, the general meeting of shareholders of Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank (03618.HK) witnessed a market-concerned scene: two core proposals to revise the articles of association and the rules of procedure of the board of directors encountered

58.49%
and
55.60% of H-share shareholders’ opposition
[1]. Although the two proposals were finally passed relying on the absolute controlling advantage of A-share shareholders, the sharp opposition between the A-share and H-share shareholder camps revealed deep-seated corporate governance conflicts[1].

The core clause of the dispute is the

removal of the provision that “the president shall not concurrently serve as the secretary of the board of directors”
. In the view of the management, this is a measure to improve decision-making efficiency; however, in the eyes of international institutional shareholders, it is a
weakening of the power balance mechanism
[1]. This dual tension between “market-oriented governance” and “administrative management” is a typical governance dilemma faced by current bank stocks.


II. Risk Signals of Sustained Decline in Core Capital Adequacy Ratio
2.1 Obvious Downward Trend of Capital Adequacy Ratio

According to the latest financial data, the core tier 1 capital adequacy ratio of Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank shows a sustained downward trend[2][3]:

Time Node Core Tier 1 Capital Adequacy Ratio Capital Adequacy Ratio
End of June 2025 13.30% -
End of September 2025 12.98% 14.77%

Key Risk Points
:

  • The core tier 1 capital adequacy ratio decreased by 0.32 percentage points in
    one quarter
    , with a significant decline
  • From a long-term trend, although the indicator remained relatively stable from 2016 to 2024, the decline in 2025 broke the previous balance[4]
  • Against the background of stricter supervision, the pressure of capital supplementation continues to increase
2.2 Profitability Pressure Intensifies Capital Consumption

The third quarterly report of 2025 shows[3]:

  • Operating income in the first three quarters was 21.658 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of only
    0.67%
  • Operating income in the third quarter decreased by
    7.98%
    month-on-month, and net profit attributable to shareholders decreased by
    24.26%
    month-on-month
  • The net interest margin was 1.59%, which was higher than the industry average but decreased by 2BP year-on-year
  • Intermediary business income continued to weaken: net fee and commission income in the first three quarters decreased by
    16.71%
    year-on-year

The continuous weakening of profitability means that

endogenous capital supplementation capacity has declined
, and the bank has to rely more on external financing channels.


III. Risk Analysis from the Perspective of Corporate Governance
3.1 Conflict Between Shareholder Rights Protection and “Functionality Priority”

The 2023 Central Financial Work Conference clearly set the top-level tone that “the functionality of the financial industry is the first, and profitability is the second”[1]. Under this framework, commercial banks are anchored as strategic tools for “serving the real economy and maintaining financial security”.

Governance Dilemma Emerges
:

  • When shareholders request to increase the dividend ratio, the management refuses on the grounds that “profits need to be retained to support credit lending to the real economy”
  • When shareholders propose to repurchase stocks that are trading below net asset value, the management refuses on the grounds that “capital must be used for risk buffering and business expansion”
  • When shareholders submit temporary proposals, the management blocks them on the grounds that “they do not conform to the direction of national financial policies”[1]

This “functionality” is becoming a “liability shield” for the management, and the traditional rights of shareholders are at risk of being hollowed out.

3.2 ESG Issues Become New Concerns

Behind the frequent opposing votes of H-share shareholders, ESG factors are increasingly prominent[5]. Foreign institutions are dissatisfied with the content of ESG reports, believing that some indicators are not fully reflected.

Voting in favor means认同 the company’s ability
, which leads to frequent high-proportion opposing votes in H-share class shareholders’ meetings.

The ESG-related questions faced by Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank include:

  • Sufficiency of information disclosure during the withdrawal and merger process of rural banks
  • Balance between capital use efficiency and shareholder returns
  • Whether the governance structure conforms to international best practices
3.3 Insufficient Transparency of Capital Planning

Judging from the strong opposition of H-share shareholders, the company may have insufficient communication with the market regarding

capital planning and supplementation strategies
. When the core capital adequacy ratio continues to decline, investors have the right to know:

  • Future capital supplementation plans and timetables
  • Balance strategy between business expansion and capital constraints
  • Specific measures for risk-weighted asset management

IV. Risk Transmission Path and Impact Assessment
4.1 Risk of Restricted Business Expansion

The decline in core capital adequacy ratio will directly restrict the business development space of the bank:

  • Growth of risk-weighted assets (RWA) is restricted
  • Loan lending capacity is constrained by capital
  • In the highly competitive Chongqing market, it may lose part of its market share
4.2 Risk of Rising Financing Costs

The decline in capital adequacy ratio will affect the bank’s credit rating, thereby increasing financing costs:

  • The interest rate for issuing tier 2 capital bonds may rise
  • Interbank financing costs may increase
  • The advantage of deposit costs may be eroded
4.3 Stock Price Pressure and Market Value Management Challenges

Currently, the H-shares of Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank have been trading below net asset value for a long time, and the decline in capital adequacy ratio will further intensify market concerns:

  • International institutional investors may continue to reduce their holdings
  • It will be more difficult to repair the valuation
  • Refinancing capacity will be restricted

V. Conclusions and Recommendations

The high-proportion opposing votes of H-share shareholders of Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank on the articles of association amendment incident are seemingly a dispute over governance clauses, but in essence, they reflect the market’s deep-seated concerns about the bank’s

capital management and corporate governance
. From the perspective of corporate governance analysis:

  1. Short-term Risks
    : The core tier 1 capital adequacy ratio continues to decline (13.30%→12.98%), endogenous supplementation capacity weakens, and exogenous financing demand rises.

  2. Medium-term Risks
    : Profitability pressure coupled with capital consumption, business expansion is restricted, and shareholder return expectations decline.

  3. Long-term Risks
    : The gap between the governance structure and ESG requirements may affect the confidence of international institutional investors and restrict valuation repair.

Core Recommendations
:

  • Strengthen active communication with H-share shareholders and transparently disclose capital supplementation plans
  • Optimize the shareholder return mechanism under the premise of meeting regulatory requirements
  • Improve ESG information disclosure to enhance the trust of international institutional investors
  • Prudently evaluate the pace of business expansion to avoid excessive capital consumption

References

[1] Sina Finance - Bank Shareholders Begin to “Say No” (https://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bank/bank_hydt/2025-12-15/doc-inhavsem4083997.shtml)

[2] NetEase Account - Fined 8.7 Million Yuan + 2 People Banned for Life, Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Penalized (https://www.163.com/dy/article/KHLEDHVG05569L3G.html)

[3] Sina Finance - Balance Between “Stability” and “Progress”: Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Seeks Progress While Maintaining Stability and Improves Quality and Efficiency in Deepening Reform (https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/wbstock/2025-12-19/doc-inhcicem5860695.shtml)

[4] China Rural Finance - Trend Chart of Capital Adequacy Ratio of Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank (https://app-new.sxwbs.com/upload/news/image/2025/12/01/1764594481969054994.png)

[5] East Money - Opposing Votes Frequently Appear in H-share Class Shareholders’ Meetings, ESG Issues Become New Concerns for Dual-listed Companies (https://finance.eastmoney.com/a/202512253601121154.html)

[6] Guancha.cn - “Complete Liquidation”, Trillion-Yuan Rural Commercial Bank Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Lists and Transfers 90% Equity of a Rural Bank (https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2025-12-22/doc-inhcsmfm6261037.shtml)


Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.