Ginlix AI
50% OFF

Analysis of Operational Risks in Jiangte Motor's Futures Hedging Loss Incident

#futures_hedging #business_risk #lithium_industry #financial_risk #risk_management #derivative_trading #jiangte_motor
Neutral
A-Share
December 28, 2025

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

Analysis of Operational Risks in Jiangte Motor's Futures Hedging Loss Incident

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

002176
--
002176
--

Based on the collected information, I systematically analyze the operational risks reflected by Jiangte Motor’s futures hedging loss incident.

Overview of Jiangte Motor’s Futures Hedging Loss Incident

In 2025, Jiangte Motor (002176.SZ) established short positions in the lithium carbonate futures market and then encountered an extreme market reversal, resulting in

tens of millions of yuan in losses
[1]. Since the launch of lithium carbonate futures in July 2023, the company has participated in hedging business, later increasing the hedging scale from 100 million yuan to 300 million yuan and adding copper futures hedging business [1].


I. Strategic-Level Operational Risks
1. Vague Main Business Positioning and Transformation Dilemma

Jiangte Motor attempts to build a dual main business pattern of ‘lithium salt + motor’, but both businesses face severe challenges:

  • Lithium salt business: Revenue growth without profit growth
    : In the first three quarters of 2025, the company’s operating revenue was 1.432 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 14.62%, but the net profit was
    113 million yuan in loss
    , a year-on-year decrease of 37.31% [1]. In the first half of the year, lithium salt production and sales increased by 115.91% year-on-year, but the gross margin fell to
    -16.27%
    , and the asset impairment loss surged by
    1513.26%
    year-on-year [1]

  • Motor business growth is slow
    : Unable to offset losses from the lithium salt segment, the company faces a dilemma of continuous blood loss from main businesses

2. Poor Execution of Resource Self-Sufficiency Strategy

The company’s high-expectation Xikeng lithium mine project has repeatedly delayed production launch, and has not yet formed effective capacity due to policy approval, technical transformation and other factors [1]. This reflects the company’s insufficient strategic execution in resource layout.


II. Defects in Risk Management System
1. Improper Risk Control in Futures Hedging

The core problem lies in the misuse of hedging tools as speculative tools
[1]:

Risk Performance Specific Description
Directional Misjudgment Established short positions when prices fell to 70,000 yuan/ton, misjudging price trends [1]
Scale Out of Control Hedging scale expanded from 100 million yuan to 300 million yuan, exceeding the reasonable hedging range [1]
Tool Abuse Turned risk hedging tools into ‘lifesaver’-style speculative behavior [1]
2. Double Loss Dilemma

The company has fallen into a dual dilemma of

‘spot loss + futures loss’
[1]:

  • Spot business losses due to falling lithium salt prices
  • Huge floating losses from short futures positions due to price rebound
  • Further intensified financial pressure

III. Financial Health Risks
1. Sustained Deterioration of Profitability

From the financial data [0][2]:

Indicator Value Risk Warning
ROE -10.17% Severe negative shareholder return
Net Profit Margin -15.31% Main business loss
Operating Profit Margin -20.66% Continuous blood loss from core business
P/E -49.14x Extremely pessimistic market outlook on profitability
2. Cash Flow Tension

The company’s free cash flow is

-298 million yuan
, and EV/OCF is -59.69x [0], indicating that operating cash flow is seriously insufficient to support business operations and debt repayment needs.


IV. Industry Cycle Risks
1. Downward Pressure of Lithium Industry Cycle

Jiangte Motor’s dilemma reflects the

common anxiety of traditional lithium salt enterprises during the industry cycle downturn
[1]. Lithium carbonate prices have fallen from the high at the beginning of the year, and the industry as a whole faces dual pressures of overcapacity and weak demand.

2. Policy and Market Uncertainties
  • Rectification of lithium mica mining rights affects raw material supply [1]
  • Price volatility caused by energy storage demand fluctuations
  • Market volatility intensified by the upgrade of risk control measures of Guangzhou Futures Exchange

V. Risk Transmission Mechanism Analysis
Main business loss → Cash flow tension → Seek quick profit-turning ways
    ↓                              ↓
Blind expansion of hedging scale → Directional misjudgment → Futures loss
    ↓                              ↓
Double loss → Financial pressure intensification → Operational risk amplification

VI. Risk Prevention Recommendations
1. Return to the Essence of Hedging
  • Determine futures positions strictly based on spot exposure
  • Establish strict stop-loss mechanisms
  • Distinguish between hedging and speculation boundaries
2. Strengthen Main Businesses
  • Focus on improving the core competitiveness of the motor business
  • Reasonably plan the expansion rhythm of the lithium salt business
  • Promote the Xikeng lithium mine to start production as soon as possible
3. Improve Risk Management System
  • Establish an independent risk control mechanism for futures business
  • Set an upper limit for futures position scale
  • Enhance market trend research and judgment capabilities

Conclusion

Jiangte Motor’s futures hedging loss incident profoundly reveals the huge risks faced by enterprises when recklessly expanding derivative business scale against the backdrop of

vague strategic positioning, insufficient competitiveness of main businesses, and deteriorating financial conditions
. This case warns investors: the futures market is a risk management tool rather than a speculative tool; blindly treating it as a ‘cash machine’ may eventually lead to the dilemma of ‘losing more than gaining’. Enterprises should return to main businesses, strengthen risk control, and use financial derivatives cautiously.


References

[1] Qihe Wang - ‘Too Stubborn! He Shortened Lithium Carbonate in a Surge Market and Lost Tens of Millions!’ (https://www.7hcn.com/article/477425-1.html)

[0] Jinling API - Jiangte Motor (002176.SZ) Company Financial Data and Market Price Information

[2] Jinling API - Jiangte Motor (002176.SZ) Financial Statement Analysis

Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.