Analysis of Compliance Issues Regarding the 24% Annualized Interest Rate of Kuaishou's Financial Business

#金融监管 #小额贷款 #利率合规 #快手 #网络小贷 #风险分析 #LPR政策
Neutral
A-Share
December 28, 2025

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

Analysis of Compliance Issues Regarding the 24% Annualized Interest Rate of Kuaishou's Financial Business

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

01024
--
01024
--

Based on the latest regulatory policies and market data, I will systematically analyze the compliance issues regarding the 24% annualized interest rate of Kuaishou’s financial business.

I. Overview of Kuaishou’s Financial Business

After obtaining the online microloan license in April 2024, Kuaishou began to accelerate its layout of financial business. Currently, Kuaishou’s financial business mainly includes:

1. Self-operated Loan Product “Shengxin Loan”

  • Annualized interest rate range:
    6.1%-24%
  • Positioned as “Kuaishou’s own lending platform”
  • Maximum loan limit: 200,000 yuan

2. Lead Generation Platform “Kuaishou Borrow”

  • Cooperates with third-party institutions such as 360 IOU, Paipai Loan, Haofenqi, and Xiaohui Pay
  • Previously, the platform’s loan annualized interest rate range was
    7.2%-36%
  • Currently, the page clearly states the loan interest rate range as
    6.1%-24% annualized

3. License Layout

  • Obtained online microloan license in March 2024
  • Registered capital increased from 500 million yuan to
    1 billion yuan
    (December 2025)
  • Holds payment license and insurance agency license

4. User Complaint Situation

According to data from the Black Cat Complaint Platform, there have been more than 300 complaints related to “Kuaishou Borrow” since 2023, with the main issues including:

  • Actual loan interest rate does not match the advertisement (users complain that the actual annual interest rate is as high as
    35.99%
    )
  • Improper collection methods
  • Excessively high interest rates

II. Analysis of Regulatory Policy Framework
1. Judicial Protection Ceiling for Private Lending (4x LPR)

According to the “Judicial Interpretation on Private Lending” revised by the Supreme People’s Court in August 2020:

Applicable Time Interest Rate Protection Ceiling Standard
Before August 20, 2020 “Two Lines and Three Zones”: 24%-36%
After August 20, 2020
4x one-year LPR

Current LPR Data (December 22, 2025):

  • One-year LPR:
    3.0%
  • 4x LPR ceiling:
    12.0%
2. Special Regulatory Requirements for the Microloan Industry

At the end of 2024, the State Financial Regulatory Administration issued the “Guidelines for the Supervision and Administration of Microloan Companies”, which put forward clear requirements for the interest rates of the microloan industry:

Core Regulatory Indicators:

Time Node Requirements
Immediate Implementation Immediately stop issuing new loans with comprehensive financing costs
over 24%
Transition Period By the end of 2026, the proportion of loans exceeding 4x LPR in the total loan amount will
decrease significantly
Final Target
By the end of 2027
, the comprehensive financing cost of all new loans must be reduced to
within 4x LPR
3. Special Provisions for Local Financial Organizations

It should be noted that the “Reply on the Scope of Application of the New Judicial Interpretation on Private Lending” clearly stipulates:

Seven types of local financial organizations supervised by local financial regulatory authorities, such as

microloan companies
, are
not applicable
to the 4x LPR standard in the “Judicial Interpretation on Private Lending”

This means that in judicial practice:

  • For microloan companies,
    some courts still apply the 24% judicial protection ceiling
  • The Supreme People’s Court’s “Several Opinions on Further Strengthening Financial Trial Work” stipulates:
    The interest rate protection ceiling for financial loan contracts is 24%

III. Compliance Analysis of Kuaishou’s 24% Annualized Interest Rate
1. Short-term Compliance Assessment

✅ Temporarily compliant (but on the edge)

Dimension Analysis Conclusion
Judicial Practice 24% does not exceed the 24% judicial protection ceiling for financial loans,
temporarily safe
Regulatory Requirements 24%
exceeds
the “over 24%” red line for immediate suspension of new loans (there is ambiguity about whether 24% itself falls into “over 24%”)
User Complaints There are cases where the actual interest rate does not match the advertisement,
high compliance risk
2. Medium-to-Long-Term Compliance Risks

⚠️ Facing significant adjustment pressure

According to regulatory requirements,

by the end of 2027
, microloan companies must reduce the comprehensive financing cost of new loans to
within 4x LPR (currently 12%)
. This means:

  1. The 24% interest rate ceiling must be significantly reduced within the next two years
  2. The reduction幅度 is as high as 50%
    (from 24% to 12%)
  3. Profit margins will be severely squeezed
3. Specific Compliance Risks

(1) Issues with Touching the Interest Rate Red Line

Regulatory Requirements Kuaishou’s Current Situation Risk Level
Immediate suspension if over 24% 24% is at the critical point 🔴 High Risk
Reach the 12% target by 2027 Currently at 24% 🔴 High Risk

(2) Issues with Discrepancies Between Advertisement and Reality

User complaints show:

  • The loan interface is marked with “
    comprehensive annual interest rate (simple interest) starting from 23.98%
  • The annual interest rate corresponding to the actual repayment plan is as high as
    35.99%

This discrepancy may involve:

  • Violation of false advertising provisions in the “Advertising Law”
  • Violation of the right to know protection in the “Consumer Rights Protection Law”
  • Price compliance review by regulatory authorities

(3) Industry Comparison Pressure

Compared with major competitors:

Platform Interest Rate Level Compliance Status
Ant Group (Jiebei) 7.2%-24% Facing pressure to reduce rates
Douyin (Fangxin Loan) 7.2%-24% Facing pressure to reduce rates
Kuaishou (Shengxin Loan) 6.1%-24% Also facing pressure to reduce rates

IV. Conclusion and Risk Assessment
Core Conclusions

Kuaishou’s 24% annualized interest rate has obvious compliance risks, mainly reflected in the following aspects:

  1. Tight time window
    : Must reduce the interest rate to within 12% by the end of 2027, with less than two years of transition period

  2. Immediate risks exist
    :

    • The 24% interest rate is on the edge of the regulatory red line
    • User complaints show that the actual implemented interest rate may exceed 24%
    • Discrepancies between advertisement and reality may attract regulatory attention
  3. Profit model under pressure
    : A 50% reduction in interest rates will seriously affect the profitability of the microloan business

Judgment on Regulatory Trends
Phase Expected Regulatory Focus
2025 Focus on inspecting products with rates above 24% and reducing the proportion of non-compliant loans
2026 Accelerate the achievement of the 4x LPR target and restrict cooperation with high-cost funds
2027 Fully implement the 12% ceiling and eliminate non-compliant institutions
Recommended Attention Items
  1. Regulatory dynamics
    : Continuously pay attention to the specific identification standards of the State Financial Regulatory Administration for the 24% critical point
  2. User complaints
    : Reduce consumer complaints related to interest rates to avoid regulatory penalties
  3. Business adjustment
    : Plan low-interest rate product lines in advance to meet the full compliance requirements in 2027
  4. Capital cost
    : Optimize funding sources to reduce costs against the background of narrowing interest spreads

References

[1] Time Weekly - “Kuaishou Microloan increases capital to 1 billion! Multiple Internet companies increase investment in microloan this year, industry reshuffle intensifies” (https://finance.sina.com.cn/jjxw/2025-12-27/doc-inhefkhm1763301.shtml)

[2] 21st Century Business Herald - “4x LPR rate cut pressure accelerates the clearing of the microloan industry” (https://www.21jingji.com/article/20251226/4d48e4afea786498240f8d9b160e077f.html)

[3] People’s Daily Online - “December LPR quotation: 1-year 3.0% 5-year and above 3.5%” (http://finance.people.com.cn/n1/2025/1222/c1004-40629559.html)

[4] Tiantong Law Firm - “Analysis of the application of the judicial interpretation on private lending and the interest rate protection ceiling” (https://www.tiantonglaw.com/Content/2024/08-21/1118029089.html)

[5] NetEase Finance - “Kuaishou, a latecomer, invests another 500 million to increase its online loan business!” (https://www.163.com/dy/article/KHQ572D50519II4K.html)

[6] China News Service - “December LPR quotation released: 1-year is 3.0% and 5-year and above is 3.5%” (https://www.chinanews.com.cn/cj/2025/12-22/10537818.shtml)

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.