Investment Value Analysis of the Web3/'Lifestyle Capital' Concept

Based on research on current cryptocurrency market trends and the Web3 investment environment, I will conduct an in-depth analysis of the potential value and risks of this concept from multiple dimensions.

---

After comprehensive research,

[1][2]. This fact itself is an important warning sign.

According to market data at the end of 2025:

• Altcoins show overall weakness
  : Solana fell by about 37%, Dogecoin and Cardano lost more than 60%, and Avalanche and Shiba Inu dropped nearly 70%[3]
• Bitcoin becomes an anchor asset
  : The market has shifted to “real utility-driven”, forcing altcoins to prove their real-world application value instead of relying on hype[3]
• 2025 is called the “reset year”
  : Weeding out weak projects, the market shifts from hype to execution verification[4]

---

• “Lifestyle Capital” is a highly abstract marketing term with no specific technical or economic definition
• Similar naming is common in the
  Social Tokens
  category; early platforms like Roll and Rally allowed creators to issue tokens to reward fans[7], but these projects generally face sustainability issues

The project claims:

• “Scalability beyond Ethereum”
• “Trust mechanism beyond Bitcoin”

:

• Ethereum has achieved high scalability through Layer 2 solutions (Arbitrum, Optimism)[6]
• Bitcoin’s Proof of Work mechanism provides security verified over 13 years
• Without a whitepaper, technical documentation, or codebase, such claims are
  unproven marketing statements

A Forbes analysis states:

[4]. Claiming to be a “2026 leader” at the end of 2025 fits a typical rather than an assessment based on current achievements.

If the project has the following characteristics, it may have real value:

1. Clear Tokenomics Design
   • Token issuance mechanism, distribution model, deflationary/inflationary mechanism
   • Specific connection mechanism with lifestyle scenarios

2. Verifiable Technical Foundation
   • Open-source codebase
   • Technical whitepaper
   • Independent audit report

3. Real Ecosystem Partnerships
   • Collaboration with lifestyle brands
   • Implementation of real application scenarios

---

Based on Investopedia’s cryptocurrency evaluation standards[5], here is a systematic analysis framework:

Dimension	Positive Signals	Negative Signals
Whitepaper	Detailed technical solution, economic model (e.g., Chainlink)[5]	No whitepaper or only marketing content (e.g., PepeCoin admits no intrinsic value)[5]
Development Team	Public identities, verifiable resumes, blockchain experience	Anonymous team, no past records
Community Engagement	Organic growth, technical discussions, developer activity	Mainly price discussions, FOMO sentiment
Tokenomics	Clear utility design, reasonable distribution mechanism	Vague, overly concentrated in the team
Audit and Compliance	Third-party security audit, regulatory transparency	No audit, evasion of regulatory issues

According to Forbes’ risk identification list[6]:

1. Announced purchases exceed market capitalization
   — Signal of financing scam
2. Lack of technical documentation
   — Only marketing materials
3. Overpromising short-term returns
   — Claiming to be a “2026 leader”
4. Anonymous team
   — No traceable responsible party

---

1. Accelerated narrative rotation
   : Cryptocurrency narratives rotate every few months (prediction markets, perpetual contracts, etc.), but VCs should focus on
   2-5 year business prospects
   instead of 2-3 month hot topics[1]

2. Real revenue paths become the focus
   : Investors are increasingly focusing on
   real revenue paths beyond tokens
   and showing more interest in equity-level investments[1]

3. Integration of traditional finance and on-chain infrastructure
   : Infrastructure like stablecoins is “digitizing currency transfers”, reducing “cryptocurrency” attributes and increasing “utility tool” attributes[4]

4. RWA (Real-World Assets) lead
   : The best-performing narrative in 2025 was RWA, with an average return of 185.76%[3], indicating the market prefers
   verifiable real asset backing

---

Before considering investing in such projects, investors should require:

• [ ] Complete technical whitepaper (not marketing content)
• [ ] GitHub codebase and development activity
• [ ] Third-party security audit report
• [ ] Technical details of scalability solutions

• [ ] Tokenomics model (issuance, distribution, destruction mechanism)
• [ ] Specific connection mechanism with lifestyle scenarios
• [ ] Revenue sources and sustainability analysis
• [ ] Comparative advantages over existing solutions

• [ ] Verification of core team identities and resumes
• [ ] Background of the advisory board
• [ ] Past project experience

• [ ] Actual partnerships (not verbal commitments)
• [ ] User growth data (not social media followers)
• [ ] Pilot projects or MVP demos

---

based on the following main reasons:

1. Information opacity
   : Lack of substantial information on mainstream platforms
2. Overpromising
   : Claiming to surpass Ethereum/Bitcoin without technical evidence
3. Suspicious timing
   : Claiming to be a “2026 leader” when altcoins generally fell at the end of 2025
4. Vague concept
   : “Lifestyle Capital” lacks a clear technical or economic definition

. This concept lacks verifiable fundamental support, and risks far outweigh potential returns.

Consider a minimal position (<1% of portfolio) only if

of the following conditions are met:

• Complete technical documentation and code audit
• Verifiable team background
• Clear token utility design
• Independent third-party evaluation

---

##7.

Based on the current market environment, investors should follow the following principles:

1. Execution > Narrative
   : Winners in 2026 will be determined by execution, not marketing narratives[4]
2. Real Utility > Hype
   : Bitcoin has become an anchor asset, forcing projects to prove real-world utility[3]
3. Transparency > Commitments
   : Require verifiable technology, team, and economic models
4. Long-term Perspective > Short-term FOMO
   : Focus on 2-5 year business prospects instead of monthly hot topics[1]

---

The ‘Lifestyle Capital’ concept of WonderChain

. The cryptocurrency market is shifting from hype-driven to utility-driven, as evidenced by the 50-80% drop in Meme coins and similar pump-and-dump tokens in 2025[6].

requires:

• Verifiable technical breakthroughs
• Clear economic model
• Real application scenarios
• Transparent team and governance

Before seeing such evidence, investors should remain cautious and treat such concepts as

rather than value investment targets.

---

[1] Forbes - “15 Leading Web3 VCs Of 2025 And Their 2026 Advice For Founders”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/irinaheaver/2025/12/22/15-leading-web3-vcs-of-2025-and-their-2026-advice-for-founders/

[2] Investopedia - “Blockchain Facts: What Is It, How It Works, and How It Can Be Used”
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/blockchain.asp

[3] Yahoo Finance - “Altcoins Limp Toward Weak 2025 Finish”
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/altcoins-limp-toward-weak-2025-133638674.html

[4] Forbes - “2026: The Year Execution, Not Hype, Will Decide The Winners”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kjartanrist/2025/12/15/2026-the-year-execution-not-hype-will-decide-the-winners/

[5] Investopedia - “How To Evaluate and Analyze Cryptocurrency”
https://www.investopedia.com/analyze-crypto-6456223

[6] Yahoo Finance - “CoinGecko Ranks Crypto Narratives by ROI”
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/coingecko-ranks-crypto-narratives-roi-100216984.html

[7] Forbes - “Social Currencies In Brazil: Blockchain’s Newest Frontier?”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/astanley/2025/07/31/social-currencies-in-brazil-blockchains-newest-frontier/