Ginlix AI
50% OFF

Analysis of Zhipu AI's Hong Kong Stock Listing Performance and Commercialization of Large Model Companies

#IPO #港股上市 #人工智能 #大模型 #商业化 #智谱AI #科技
Mixed
A-Share
January 11, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

02513
--
02513
--

Based on the collected information, I will provide an in-depth analysis of Zhipu AI’s Hong Kong Stock Listing performance and the commercialization challenges of large model companies.


Analysis of Zhipu AI’s Hong Kong Stock Listing Performance and Commercialization of Large Model Companies
I. In-Depth Analysis of Zhipu AI’s Hong Kong Stock Listing Performance
1. Basic Listing Information

Zhipu AI (Stock Code: 02513.HK) was officially listed on the main board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on

January 8, 2026
, becoming the world’s first listed company with general artificial intelligence (AGI) foundation models as its core business, hailed as the
“world’s first large model stock”
[1][2].

Indicator Data
Offer Price HK$116.20 per share
Opening Price HK$120 per share (3.27% higher opening)
Closing Price HK$131.5 per share (13.17% increase)
Total Market Capitalization HK$57.89 billion
Over-Subscription Multiple 1159x
Net Proceeds Approximately HK$4.173 billion
2. Analysis of Stock Price Performance

Looking at the first-day performance, Zhipu AI’s stock price experienced a

volatile trend
:

  • Opening Session
    : Opened 3.27% higher at HK$120
  • Intraday Correction
    : The gain narrowed at one point, and the stock price
    fell below the offer price temporarily
  • Late-Session Surge
    : Closed with a 13.17% increase at HK$131.5[1][2]

This “rise first, then pull back, then surge” performance reflects the market’s complex attitude towards the company: while optimistic about the prospects of the AI track, it also has concerns about its commercialization capabilities and profit prospects.

3. Financial Fundamentals

Zhipu AI exhibits typical

high growth and high loss
characteristics[3]:

Year Operating Revenue YoY Growth Rate Annual Loss
2022 RMB 57.4 million RMB 144 million
2023 RMB 125 million 117% RMB 788 million
2024 RMB 312 million 130% RMB 2.958 billion
H1 2025 RMB 191 million 325% RMB 2.358 billion

Key Observations
:

  • Revenue maintains triple-digit growth, but
    losses are expanding at a faster pace
  • Average monthly loss of approximately RMB 300 million in H1 2025
  • As of H1 2025, cash and cash equivalents stood at RMB 2.552 billion, plus bank credit facilities totaling approximately RMB 8.943 billion[3]

II. Analysis of Commercialization Dilemmas for Large Model Companies
1. Analysis of Zhipu AI’s Business Model

Zhipu AI’s business model is mainly based on

MaaS (Model as a Service)
, which specifically includes[2]:

  • Local Privatized Deployment
    : Accounts for approximately 85% (project-based outsourcing)
  • Cloud API Calls
    : Accounts for approximately 15%

Use of Proceeds
:

  • 70% (approximately HK$2.9 billion) for general AI large model R&D
  • 10% (approximately HK$420 million) for optimizing the MaaS platform
2. Core Challenges in Commercialization
(1) Gross Profit Margin Under Pressure

Zhipu AI’s

gross profit margin has dropped to -0.4%
, meaning every transaction is losing money[3]. This is mainly due to:

  • Huge computing power investment required for large model training and inference
  • The local deployment model requires a large amount of customized services
  • Fierce market competition and price wars compress profit margins
(2) Customer Structure Issues
  • Purchase-Sales Inversion
    : The amount purchased from customers exceeds sales revenue
  • Frequent Replacement of Major Customers
    : Most are one-time transactions with low stickiness
  • Surge in Collection Cycle
    : Increased from 21 days to 112 days
(3) Deteriorating Competitive Landscape
  • Squeeze from Internet Giants
    : Alibaba, Tencent, etc. are sweeping the market with free APIs and migration subsidies
  • Technology Homogenization
    : The capability gap between foundation models is narrowing, with price becoming the main competitive dimension
  • Accelerated Capital Consumption
    : Computing power service fees have soared 70x in three years, eating up 70% of R&D expenses

III. How Large Model Companies Can Break Through Commercialization Bottlenecks
1. Three Mainstream Commercialization Paths

Based on industry practices, large model companies mainly have the following three commercialization paths[4]:

Path Model Representative Enterprises Advantages Challenges
API Service
Billed by token OpenAI, Zhipu AI Low marginal cost, rapid scaling Fierce price wars, low profit margins
SaaS Subscription
Monthly/annual subscription Claude Stable revenue, high customer stickiness Difficult to cultivate willingness to pay
Vertical Solutions
Customized services AI companies in various industries High customer unit price, clear demand High labor costs, difficult to scale
2. Kai-Fu Lee’s “Soul-Searching”

Kai-Fu Lee, CEO of 01.AI, pointed out:

2025 is the year of “soul-searching” for the business models of large model companies
[5]. The core issues include:

“Business models that can drive revenue growth and profits are the new industry focus, and all large model companies need to be prepared.”

Industry Consensus
:

  • Only
    2-3 pure foundation model companies
    may remain in the future
  • Each company needs to find a
    differentiated positioning
    - vertical fields such as AI healthcare, AI finance, AI entertainment, etc.
  • PMF (Product-Market Fit)
    has become a key verification indicator
3. Suggestions for Breakthrough Paths
(1) Deepen Vertical Scenarios
  • Focus on specific industries (such as legal, finance, healthcare)
  • Establish domain-specific data and knowledge barriers
  • Provide end-to-end solutions instead of pure model calls
(2) Commercialization of AI Agents
  • Shift from “selling models” to “selling capabilities”
  • Develop autonomous task-executing agents
  • Charge based on results (value sharing)
(3) Cost Optimization and Efficiency Improvement
  • Refer to DeepSeek’s
    545% cost profit margin
    practice[4]
  • Optimize model inference efficiency and reduce marginal costs
  • Open-source cost-reduction technologies and build ecological barriers
(4) Platform Transformation
  • Build an AI middle platform to improve the reuse efficiency of models and data
  • Shift from project-based to platform-based intelligent capability output
  • Build a developer ecosystem to achieve network effects

IV. Zhipu AI’s Response Strategies and Prospects
1. Zhipu AI’s Differentiated Path

Zhipu AI has chosen the route of

adhering to leading foundation model technology
:

  • Localization of GLM Architecture
    : Compatible with over 40 domestic chips
  • High-Frequency Iteration
    : Completes a foundation model iteration every 2-3 months
  • International Layout
    : Gained paid access from 150,000 developers in 184 countries
2. Risks and Opportunities Coexist
Risk Factors Opportunities
Cash flow pressure (average monthly loss of RMB 300 million) HK$4.1 billion raised via Hong Kong Stock Exchange Chapter 18C listing
Negative gross profit margin ARR (Annual Recurring Revenue) exceeds RMB 500 million (25x growth)
Fierce competition from giants MaaS growth rate exceeds 900%
Business model to be verified Brand effect of being the “world’s first large model stock”
3. Significance as an Industry Bellwether

Zhipu AI’s listing has

bellwether significance
for the entire AI sector[2]:

  • Verifies the IPO path for large model companies in the Chinese market
  • Provides a reference for subsequent listings of AI companies (such as MiniMax)
  • Undergoes commercial value testing on a more transparent capital stage

V. Conclusions and Outlook

Zhipu AI’s first-day performance on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (13.17% closing increase) indicates that the market remains enthusiastic about the AI track, but the volatile stock price reflects investors’

cautious attitude towards its commercialization capabilities
.

The key for large model companies to break through commercialization bottlenecks
lies in:

  1. Shift from technology-oriented to business value-oriented
    - Revenue that generates profits is sustainable
  2. Find differentiated positioning
    - Avoid homogeneous competition and deepen vertical scenarios
  3. Optimize cost structure
    - Improve inference efficiency and reduce marginal costs
  4. Build customer stickiness
    - Shift from one-time projects to long-term service relationships

As Kai-Fu Lee said:

“2025 will be the first year of explosive growth in large model applications”
, but the premise is that every company can answer the core question of “whether there is a profitable business model”[5]. As the “world’s first large model stock”, Zhipu AI’s subsequent development will provide valuable reference experience for the Chinese and even global AI industries.


References

[1] Caixin - Zhipu AI Opens 3.27% Higher on Hong Kong Stock Exchange Debut, Up Nearly 9% with Market Cap of Approximately HK$55.5 Billion (https://companies.caixin.com/m/2026-01-08/102401577.html)
[2] Securities Times - “World’s First Large Model Stock” Zhipu AI Debuts with Market Cap Exceeding HK$57 Billion (https://www.stcn.com/article/detail/3580246.html)
[3] Eastmoney - Zhipu AI is Navigating the Most Dangerous Phase for Large Models (https://caifuhao.eastmoney.com/news/20251226100445247893150)
[4] OFweek AI Network - Three Commercialization Paths for AI Large Models (https://m.ofweek.com/ai/2025-03/ART-201700-8420-30658587.html)
[5] 36Kr - Kai-Fu Lee: 2025 is the Year of “Soul-Searching” for Large Model Companies’ Business Models (https://m.36kr.com/p/3116161197969416)

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.