Ginlix AI
50% OFF

In-Depth Analysis Report on the Impact of Automotive-Grade Certification Subsidy Policies on the Competitive Landscape and Valuation of Domestic Automotive Chip Enterprises

#车规级认证 #汽车芯片 #国产替代 #集成电路政策 #智驾芯片 #估值分析 #竞争格局
Positive
A-Share
January 13, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

In-Depth Analysis Report on the Impact of Automotive-Grade Certification Subsidy Policies on the Competitive Landscape and Valuation of Domestic Automotive Chip Enterprises

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

02533.HK
--
02533.HK
--
02498.HK
--
02498.HK
--
HSAI
--
HSAI
--
688001
--
688001
--
002156
--
002156
--
600584
--
600584
--

Based on the above in-depth analysis, I will provide you with a systematic research report on the impact of automotive-grade certification subsidy policies on the competitive landscape and valuation of domestic automotive chip enterprises.


I. Interpretation of Core Policy Clauses
1.1 Policy Background and Orientation

The draft for comments of “Several Policies of Guangzhou on Promoting High-Quality Development of the Integrated Circuit Industry Throughout the Chain During the 15th Five-Year Period” issued by the Guangzhou Bureau of Industry and Information Technology is a policy innovation by a local government to provide special subsidies for the automotive-grade certification link for the first time [1]. This policy precisely focuses on the weak link of the domestic automotive chip industry — automotive-grade certification, aiming to promote the development of the domestic automotive chip industry and enhance the independent controllability of automotive-grade chips [1].

Automotive-grade certification is the core threshold for domestic chips to enter the automotive supply chain, covering AEC-Q series testing standards (automotive-grade product testing), AQG series standards (automotive-grade power module reliability testing), IATF16949 standard (automotive quality management system), and ISO26262 standard (road vehicle functional safety) [1]. These certifications are not only essential conditions for products to be deployed in vehicles, but also important basis for downstream automakers and Tier 1 suppliers to adopt domestic chips [1].

1.2 Subsidy Standards and Coverage
Subsidy Dimension Details
Subsidy Ratio
No more than 30% of the actual certification expenditure
Subsidy Cap
Maximum of RMB 2 million per enterprise annually
Applicable Period
15th Five-Year Period (2026-2030)
Covered Certifications
AEC-Q100/101/200, ISO26262, IATF16949, AQG Series

From the perspective of subsidy structure, the cost of a single certification is approximately RMB 0.6-1.2 million, and the total cost for an enterprise to complete a full set of certifications (4-5 items) is approximately RMB 4-5 million. The 30% subsidy can save enterprises approximately RMB 1.2-1.5 million in certification expenses [2]. Considering that the automotive-grade certification cycle is usually 12-24 months, the subsidy policy will significantly reduce the cash flow pressure and financial risks of enterprises.

II. Analysis of Impacts on Competitive Landscape
2.1 Current Market Competition Situation (2024-2025)

The current domestic automotive chip market presents a competitive landscape of “international giants leading, domestic players catching up rapidly”. In the intelligent driving chip field, NVIDIA ranks first with a 39.8% market share, Tesla FSD accounts for 25.1% with self-developed chips, Huawei Ascend series accounts for 9.5%, and domestic enterprises such as Horizon Robotics account for approximately 8-10% in total [3].

Market Share Change Trend of Intelligent Driving Chips:

Supplier 2024 2025E 2026E Competitive Advantages Competitive Disadvantages
NVIDIA 39.8% 36% 33% Leading computing power/ecosystem High cost/black box
Tesla 25.1% 26% 26% Vertical integration/data closed-loop For self-use only
Huawei 9.5% 12% 14% Huawei ecosystem/localization Relatively high cost
Horizon Robotics 6% 10% 13% Cost-effectiveness/localization Ecosystem to be improved
Black Sesame Intelligence, etc. 2% 6% 10% High computing power/domestic replacement Insufficient mass production experience
2.2 Five Impact Paths of the Policy on Competitive Landscape

First, lower the cost threshold for domestic replacement.
Automotive-grade certification costs account for approximately 15-25% of total product R&D costs, and the 30% subsidy can directly reduce R&D costs by 4.5-7.5 percentage points [2]. This policy dividend is particularly important for small and medium-sized enterprises, as it can significantly reduce the capital barrier for them to enter the automotive-grade market.

Second, accelerate the deployment of domestic chips in vehicles.
The policy enhances the trust of downstream automakers in domestic chips, and the certification cycle is expected to be shortened by 3-6 months. It is expected that the penetration rate of domestic intelligent driving chips will increase from 15% in 2024 to 25-30% in 2026 [3].

Third, reshape the profit distribution pattern of the industrial chain.
The gross margin of chip enterprises is expected to increase by 2-3 percentage points, and the industrial chain discourse power will shift from international giants to domestic enterprises. The competitiveness of vertical integration models (such as BYD Semiconductor) will be further highlighted [4].

Fourth, promote industrial agglomeration effects.
Guangzhou and the Pearl River Delta region will form an automotive-grade chip industrial cluster, with enhanced collaborative effects among design, manufacturing, and packaging/testing. The improvement of regional competitiveness will attract more capital and enterprises to settle in.

Fifth, force international giants to compete on price.
The accelerated domestic replacement will compress the market share of international giants, and NVIDIA, Qualcomm, etc. may be forced to cut prices or provide value-added services, which is overall conducive to reducing the procurement costs of automakers [5].

2.3 Analysis of Beneficiary Enterprise Tiers
Tier Enterprise Type Typical Enterprises Expected Annual Cost Savings Policy Sensitivity
Tier 1
Intelligent Driving SoC Design Enterprises Horizon Robotics, Black Sesame Intelligence RMB 1.5-2 million >85%
Tier 1
Lidar Enterprises RoboSense, Hesai Technology RMB 1.2-1.8 million >90%
Tier 1
SiC Power Device Enterprises Zhanxin Electronics, Paieng Semiconductor RMB 1.3-1.8 million >80%
Tier 2
Automotive-Grade Sensor Enterprises Huayi Technology, Ruizhu Technology RMB 0.6-1 million 70-80%
Tier 2
Analog Chip Enterprises Nasemi, Richtek RMB 0.5-0.9 million 65-75%
Tier 3
Packaging and Testing Enterprises TFME, JCET RMB 0.7-1.2 million 50-65%
III. Analysis of Impacts on Valuation
3.1 Mechanism of Valuation Impact Paths

The impact of the policy on valuation follows the transmission path of “cost reduction → profit improvement → valuation increase”:

Policy Release → Certification Cost Reduction → Gross Margin Improvement → Net Profit Growth → PE Valuation Increase
              │
              └──→ Certification Cycle Shortening → Mass Production Acceleration → Revenue Recognition in Advance → PS Valuation Increase
3.2 Valuation Impact Calculation for Major Enterprises
Enterprise Current Valuation (RMB 100 million) Current PS Gross Margin Improvement PS Upside Valuation Increase Range
Horizon Robotics 560-700 15-20x +2-3% +5-10% +5-10%
Black Sesame Intelligence 50-60 8-10x +2-3% +5-8% +10-15%
RoboSense 160-200 12-15x +2-4% +5-10% +8-12%
Hesai Technology 130-150 15-18x +2-3% +5-8% +8-10%
San’an Optoelectronics 800 (Market Cap) 6-8x +1-2% +2-4% +3-5%
3.3 Driving Factors of Valuation Premiums

Certification Premium:
Enterprises that complete a full set of automotive-grade certifications can obtain a 5-10% valuation premium, and enterprises with dual certifications of AEC-Q100+ISO26262 can obtain a higher premium [6].

Mass Production Premium:
Enterprises that enter the supply chain of mainstream automakers can obtain a 10-15% valuation premium. For every 1 million units increase in mass production scale, PS increases by 0.5-1x.

Technology Premium:
Enterprises with high computing power chips (>500TOPS) can obtain a 10-20% valuation premium, and enterprises with self-developed core IP can obtain a 5-10% premium [7].

Customer Structure Premium:
Enterprises that cover leading automakers (such as BYD, Tesla) can obtain a 5-10% premium, and enterprises with low customer concentration (>10 automakers) can obtain a 5-8% premium.

3.4 Valuation Sensitivity Analysis

High-Sensitivity Enterprises (Policy Sensitivity >80%):

  • Characteristics: Not yet profitable, in critical period of mass production, high R&D investment
  • Representatives: Horizon Robotics, RoboSense, Hesai Technology
  • Valuation Elasticity: PS increases by 5-10%, market cap elasticity of 10-15%

Medium-Sensitivity Enterprises (Policy Sensitivity 50-80%):

  • Characteristics: Already in small-scale mass production, under gross margin pressure, certification in progress
  • Representatives: Black Sesame Intelligence, ECarX
  • Valuation Elasticity: PS increases by 3-8%, market cap elasticity of 5-10%

Low-Sensitivity Enterprises (Policy Sensitivity <50%):

  • Characteristics: Mature enterprises, internal supporting, stable profitability
  • Representatives: San’an Optoelectronics, BYD Semiconductor
  • Valuation Elasticity: PE increases by 3-5%, market cap elasticity of 3-5%
IV. Investment Strategy Recommendations
4.1 Overweight Directions (Directly Benefiting from the Policy)

1. Intelligent Driving SoC Design Enterprises

  • Recommended Targets: Horizon Robotics (IPO in progress), Black Sesame Intelligence (02533.HK)
  • Investment Logic: Automotive-grade certification subsidies directly reduce R&D costs and accelerate mass production and vehicle deployment [3]
  • Catalysts: AEC-Q100 certification breakthrough, mass production designation

2. Lidar and Self-Developed Chip Enterprises

  • Recommended Targets: RoboSense (02498.HK), Hesai Technology (HSAI)
  • Investment Logic: Full range of self-developed chips have passed AEC-Q certification, enjoying the superimposed effect of subsidies [6]
  • Catalysts: Mass production of self-developed chips, designation for new vehicle models

3. SiC Power Device Enterprises

  • Recommended Targets: Zhanxin Electronics, Paieng Semiconductor
  • Investment Logic: Popularization of 800V high-voltage platforms drives demand, and certification subsidies accelerate vehicle deployment [5]
  • Catalysts: Automotive-grade products pass certification, enter supply chains of mainstream automakers
4.2 Standard Allocation Directions (Indirectly Benefiting)

Automotive-Grade Sensor and Inertial Navigation Enterprises:
Recommend Huayi Technology (688001). The increase in intelligent driving penetration drives demand, and certification subsidies reduce costs.

Automotive Packaging and Testing Enterprises:
Recommend TFME (002156), JCET (600584). The volume growth of domestic chips drives packaging and testing demand.

4.3 Suggestions on Buying Timing
  1. First Trading Day After Policy Release:
    It is recommended to avoid during the short-term sentiment boom period
  2. When Enterprises Obtain Key Automotive-Grade Certifications:
    First buying point (relatively high margin of safety)
  3. When Valuation Pulls Back Below Historical Midpoint:
    Optimal buying timing
4.4 Key Tracking Indicators
Tracking Indicator Monitoring Frequency Core Significance
Automotive-Grade Certification Progress Monthly Precondition for products to be deployed in vehicles
Mass Production Designation Status Quarterly Driving force for revenue growth
Gross Margin Changes Quarterly Verification of subsidy policy effects
Market Share Changes Semi-Annual Evolution of competitive landscape
V. Risk Warning
5.1 Policy Risks
  • Policy details fall short of expectations or subsidy implementation is delayed
  • Local fiscal pressure leads to uncertainty in subsidy disbursement
  • Expectation of subsidy withdrawal
5.2 Technical Risks
  • Failure or delay in automotive-grade certification
  • Technical iteration lags behind competitors
  • Product performance fails to meet automakers’ requirements
5.3 Market Risks
  • Intelligent driving penetration grows slower than expected
  • Price wars among automakers compress chip procurement costs
  • International giants carry out substantial price cuts for competition
5.4 Operational Risks
  • Mass production progress falls short of expectations
  • High customer concentration
  • Supply chain stability issues
5.5 Valuation Risks
  • Current PS valuation is at a historical high
  • Profit realization cycle is long
  • Market sentiment fluctuations lead to significant valuation volatility
VI. Conclusions and Outlook
6.1 Core Conclusions

Guangzhou’s automotive-grade certification subsidy policy will have a profound impact on the domestic automotive chip industry:

Competitive Landscape Restructuring:
The policy accelerates the domestic replacement process. It is expected that the market share of domestic intelligent driving chips will increase from 15% in 2024 to 25-30% in 2026. The entry threshold for small and medium-sized enterprises is reduced, the number of market competitors increases, and the industrial agglomeration effect is significant [1][3].

Differentiated Valuation Impacts:
High-sensitivity enterprises (such as Horizon Robotics, RoboSense) will see a 5-15% valuation increase. Certification premiums, mass production premiums, and technology premiums will become the core driving forces for valuation growth [6][7].

Clear Investment Opportunities:
Intelligent driving SoCs, lidars, and SiC power devices are the three core tracks. Enterprises with full automotive-grade certification capabilities will obtain excess returns.

6.2 Forward-Looking Judgments

The policy will push the domestic automotive chip industry into a “accelerated development” stage:

  • 2025-2026:
    Certification acceleration period, domestic replacement advances rapidly
  • 2027-2028:
    Mass production volume growth period, market landscape takes initial shape
  • 2029-2030:
    Mature competition period, leading enterprises stand out

In the long run, enterprises with leading technological advantages, cost control capabilities, and customer resources will win in the competition and gain sustained market share and valuation premiums.


References

[1] General Office of Guangzhou Municipal People’s Government. Draft for Comments of “Several Policies of Guangzhou on Promoting High-Quality Development of the Integrated Circuit Industry Throughout the Chain During the 15th Five-Year Period”. 2025.

[2] China Electronics News. “Showing Integrated Circuit Support Policies Across the Country”. August 21, 2025.

[3] EETI Research Institute. “2025 Intelligent Driving Chips: The ‘Warring States Period’ of Old Kings and New Nobles”. 2025.

[4] Economic Observer Network. “2025 New Energy Vehicle Product Value Index (Q1)”. 2025.

[5] Weikehao. “Top 10 Annual Financing Hotspots in the Automotive Industry 2025”. 2025.

[6] IT Home. “From Technological Breakthrough to Ecological Implementation, RoboSense Embodied Intelligence Shines at CES”. January 2026.

[7] 36Kr. “Black Sesame Intelligence: The Breakthrough Path of Domestic Autonomous Driving Chips”. 2024.

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.