In-Depth Analysis of Business Structure Contradictions and Valuation Recovery of BBMG Corporation (601992.SS)

Based on the data and analysis I collected, I now present a systematic and comprehensive analysis report on the business structure contradictions and valuation recovery of BBMG Corporation.

---

Beijing BBMG Corporation Limited is a leading enterprise in China’s building materials industry, ranking as the third-largest cement group in the country [1]. The company adopts a “1+7+X” organizational structure model, forming a complete building materials industry chain with cement at its core, covering upstream and downstream supporting sectors such as concrete, wall and insulation materials, prefabricated building systems and components, furniture and wood products [2]. The company is also one of the largest and most diverse holders and managers of investment properties in Beijing.

Indicator	Value
Latest Closing Price	2.34 CNY/share
1-Day Change	+9.86%
1-Month Change	+40.12%
6-Month Change	+45.34%
1-Year Change	+36.05%
5-Year Change	-20.95%

The recent strong rebound in the stock price is mainly driven by the overall valuation recovery of the cement sector, but the long-term stock price performance is still in a downward trend [0].

BBMG’s business structure shows typical “dual-wheel drive” characteristics, but the business cycles of its two core segments are significantly misaligned:

Business Segment	Revenue Share	Business Nature
Commodity Trading	52.18%	Trading business with low gross profit margin
Product Sales	31.69%	Mainly cement and clinker sales
Property Sales	7.68%	Real estate development business
Decoration & Renovation	2.64%	Building decoration business
Rental Income	2.20%	Property investment and management
Property Management	1.32%	Property services
Other	0.75%	Solid waste treatment, hotel operations, etc. [1]

Although the real estate business accounts for only 7.68% of revenue, due to its high gross profit margin and high leverage characteristics, its performance fluctuations have a far greater impact on overall profits than its revenue share. As the main revenue contributor (product sales account for 31.69%), the cement business has turned profitable year-on-year, but the magnitude of profit recovery cannot fully offset the expanding losses of the real estate business.

---

According to market data, the cement industry showed marginal improvement in 2025. BBMG Jidong Cement, as a regional leader, benefits from:

1. Supply-side contraction:
   Policies such as overproduction inspections and strict control of replacement quotas are steadily advancing, with leading enterprises taking the lead in strengthening industry self-discipline
2. Cost-side improvement:
   The decline in coal prices brings cost-side benefits, with major cement players such as Conch and Jidong seeing significant net profit growth in 2025
3. Optimized regional market pattern:
   BBMG Jidong has strong market control in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, with obvious price coordination effects

• National cement output was approximately 1.259 billion tons, down 5.1% year-on-year [2]
• The real estate market is still in deep adjustment at the bottom, with new construction area down 18.9% year-on-year
• Infrastructure investment growth has weakened, turning negative for the first time since 2021

1. Persistent sluggish market demand:
   The real estate market is in deep adjustment, with shrinking housing demand
2. Pressure on sales prices:
   Against the backdrop of weak demand, the de-stocking cycle of properties has lengthened, and discount promotions have become the norm
3. Declining project gross profit margin:
   Projects on high-priced land have entered the settlement cycle, leading to a significant decline in gross profit margin
4. Inventory impairment pressure:
   Existing projects face potential inventory write-down provisions

As a Beijing-based state-owned enterprise, BBMG undertakes some policy-oriented development tasks and has certain advantages in land acquisition, but at the same time faces:

• Limited profit margin on indemnificatory housing projects
• Longer de-stocking cycle for market-oriented projects
• Increasing capital turnover pressure

Comparison Dimension	Cement Business	Real Estate Business
Revenue Share	~32%	~8%
Profit Contribution	Turned profitable, positive contribution	Worsening losses, negative drag
Cycle Position	Cycle bottom, marginal improvement	Deep adjustment, not yet bottomed out
Valuation Impact	Positive support	Negative suppression
Recovery Rhythm	Faster	Slower

The profit recovery of the cement business is of a “stop bleeding” nature, while the expanding losses of the real estate business are of a “bleeding out” nature. There is a significant misalignment in the recovery rhythm and time window of the two, leading to divergent market expectations for the company’s fundamental improvement.

---

Financial Indicator	2022	2023	2024	2025E
Operating Revenue (CNY 100 million)	1100+	1080	1107.12	~990
Net Profit Attributable to Shareholders (CNY 100 million)	Profitable	0.25	-5.55	-9~-12
Gross Profit Margin	Declining	Declining	Under pressure	Under pressure
Non-GAAP Net Profit	Declining	Declining	Loss-making	Loss-making

• Operating Revenue: CNY 69.489 billion, down 9.80% year-on-year
• Net Profit Attributable to Shareholders: -CNY 1.425 billion, down 226.44% year-on-year [1]

Indicator	Value	Industry Comparison	Risk Warning
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)	-16.19x	Generally negative across the industry	P/E becomes invalid due to continuous losses
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)	0.62x	Lower than industry average	Concerns over asset quality
Return on Equity (ROE)	-2.70%	Significantly negative	Serious lack of shareholder return capacity
Current Ratio	1.60	Relatively healthy	Short-term solvency is acceptable
Quick Ratio	0.62	Relatively low	High inventory ratio, weak liquidity [0]

Based on the DCF valuation model, the intrinsic value assessment results of BBMG Corporation are as follows:

Valuation Scenario	Intrinsic Value	Deviation from Current Price
Conservative Scenario	-CNY 96.68 per share	-4231.6%
Neutral Scenario	-CNY 41.35 per share	-1867.1%
Optimistic Scenario	-CNY 15.31 per share	-754.3%

1. Intrinsic value is negative under all scenarios, reflecting deep market concerns about the company’s going-concern ability
2. The company is currently in a “value destruction” state, with continuous negative free cash flow (approximately -CNY 8.73 billion)
3. Profit forecasts show that EPS will still be -CNY 0.16 per share in 2027, with no clear timeline for turning profitable [0]

---

1. Valuation Discount on Real Estate Business
   • The real estate sector as a whole is in the historical lowest valuation range
   • Mainland real estate stocks listed in Hong Kong generally see their net assets slashed to extremely low levels (“ankle-cut”)
   • Calculated using industry valuation methods, BBMG’s real estate business has actually severely eroded net assets

2. Profit Cycle Misalignment
   • The recovery cycle of the cement business does not match the time window of the real estate downturn cycle
   • It is difficult for investors to form a clear path of profit improvement expectations
   • Leading to a lack of clear anchor for valuation recovery

3. Cash Flow Pressure
   • Real estate development requires large upfront investment
   • Sales proceeds are lower than expected, putting pressure on cash flow
   • Investors lack confidence in when the “bleeding point” will be closed

1. Unexpected rise in cement prices
   • Strengthened implementation of industry self-discipline
   • Accelerated elimination of backward production capacity
   • Persistently low coal costs

2. Reduced losses or divestment of real estate business
   • Accelerated asset disposal
   • Release of strategic adjustment signals
   • Expectations of state-owned enterprise reform

1. Business Structure Optimization
   • Increase the revenue and profit share of the cement business
   • Reduce exposure to the real estate business
   • Focus on the core building materials main business

2. Profitability Recovery
   • Gross profit margin stabilizes and rebounds
   • Effective control of expense ratio
   • Free cash flow turns positive

3. Recovery of Market Sentiment
   • Confirmation of the policy bottom for the real estate industry
   • Upward shift of the industry valuation center
   • Increased risk appetite

Valuation Dimension	Current Level	Historical Percentile	Rationality Judgment
P/B	0.62x	Low level	Partially reflects concerns over asset quality
P/E	Invalid	-	P/E loses meaning in loss-making status
Dividend Yield	~4%	Neutral	Dividend commitment provides certain support
EV/EBITDA	15.5x	Neutral to high	Implies certain growth expectations

---

1. Valuation recovery of the cement sector:
   Supply-side reform in the industry continues to advance, with leading enterprises benefiting significantly
2. Regional advantages in Beijing:
   The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei coordinated development strategy provides demand support
3. High dividend attractiveness:
   35% minimum dividend ratio commitment, with a dividend yield of approximately 4%
4. Technical rebound momentum:
   Strong short-term stock price with good volume support

1. Continuous losses in the real estate business:
   Profit recovery rhythm falls short of expectations
2. Downward industry cycle:
   The strength of recovery in cement demand is uncertain
3. Valuation system under pressure:
   DCF model shows negative intrinsic value
4. Market style shift:
   Overall attention to cyclical stocks declines

Scenario	Trigger Conditions	Expected Return	Probability
Optimistic Scenario	Unexpected rise in cement prices + reduced real estate losses	+30%~50%	20%
Neutral Scenario	Cement prices stabilize + real estate losses remain flat	+10%~20%	50%
Pessimistic Scenario	Worsening real estate losses + correction in cement prices	-20%~30%	30%

1. Risk of continued downturn in the real estate industry:
   Housing prices fall more than expected, making project de-stocking difficult
2. Risk of cement price fluctuations:
   Regional price wars intensify, leading to profit improvement falling short of expectations
3. Risk of policy implementation:
   Progress in capacity replacement policy falls short of expectations
4. Risk of cash flow disruption:
   Excessive capital tied up in real estate projects affects liquidity

---

The business structure contradiction faced by BBMG is essentially a

— the bottoming recovery of the cement business and the deep adjustment of the real estate industry form a “scissors gap”, resulting in the company’s overall performance improvement process lagging behind market expectations.

1. When the real estate business stops losses:
   This is a prerequisite for valuation recovery
2. The extent of profit elasticity release from the cement business:
   Determines the height and sustainability of recovery
3. Market revaluation of business structure:
   Whether investors are willing to give independent valuation to the cement main business

, the technical rebound in the stock price has partially priced in expectations of fundamental improvement. It is recommended that investors remain cautious and closely watch the 2025 annual report and 2026 first quarter report data to verify the actual progress of business structure optimization.

, if the company can effectively control losses in the real estate business and focus on the development of the cement main business, the valuation recovery space is still considerable against the backdrop of industry supply-side reform. However, considering the current industry cycle position and the company’s financial status, it is recommended that investors list BBMG Corporation on the “watch list” and wait for more clear fundamental improvements before intervening.

---

[0] Jinling API Market Data and Financial Analysis

[1] Sina Finance - BBMG Corporation Hits Daily Limit, Trading Volume Reaches CNY 1.665 Billion, Main Capital Inflows CNY 259 Million in the Past 3 Days (https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/aiassist/ggsp/2026-01-14/doc-inhhhhqr8325599.shtml)

[2] East Money - In-Depth Research Report on BBMG Corporation (https://pdf.dfcfw.com/pdf/H3_AP202512191803551081_1.pdf)