Ginlix AI
50% OFF

In-Depth Evaluation Report of Buchang Pharmaceutical's Sales Expenses and Marketing Efficiency

#pharmaceutical #sales_expenses #marketing_efficiency #financial_analysis #profitability #compliance
Negative
A-Share
January 16, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

603858
--
603858
--

Based on the data and analysis I have collected, I now present to you an in-depth evaluation report on Buchang Pharmaceutical’s sales expenses and marketing efficiency.


In-Depth Analysis Report on Sales Expenses and Marketing Efficiency of Buchang Pharmaceutical (603858.SS)
I. Overview of Sales Expenses
1.1 Core Data Overview

According to Buchang Pharmaceutical’s 2025 Q3 report and annual report data[0]:

Indicator 2024 Full Year 2025 First Half 2025 Q3 Report
Sales Expenses (100 million yuan) 43.23 22.39 33.41
Operating Revenue (100 million yuan) 110.04 56.64 Approx. 84.82
Sales Expense Ratio 39.28% 39.54% 39.40%

Key Finding:
Buchang Pharmaceutical’s sales expense ratio has continued to climb from 32% in 2020 to 39.4% in 2025, an increase of 7.4 percentage points[1]. This indicates that the company’s marketing cost burden is continuously increasing.

1.2 Analysis of Sales Expense Composition (2024 Data)

Buchang Pharmaceutical’s sales expense structure presents the following characteristics[0]:

Expense Item Amount (100 million yuan) Proportion Year-on-Year Change
Market, Academic Promotion and Consulting Fees 40.33 93.28% Year-on-Year Decrease
Employee Compensation 2.42 5.59% Decrease
Advertising and Promotion Fees 0.27 0.63% Significant Decrease
Other 0.22 0.50% Decrease

Structural Feature:
Buchang Pharmaceutical adopts a typical “academic promotion + channel expansion” marketing model, with market, academic promotion and consulting fees accounting for an absolute dominant position in sales expenses (over 93%)—this is a compliant marketing method widely adopted by Chinese pharmaceutical enterprises[2][3].


II. Peer Comparison Analysis of Marketing Efficiency
2.1 Industry Comparison of Sales Expense Ratio

According to 2024 annual report data of comparable peer companies[0]:

Company Sales Expenses (100 million yuan) Sales Expense Ratio Revenue per 100 Million Yuan in Sales Expenses
Tibet Pharmaceuticals 15.62 55.67% 180 million yuan
Buchang Pharmaceutical
43.23
39.28%
255 million yuan
Kangyuan Pharmaceuticals 15.35 39.39% 254 million yuan
Tasly 29.88 35.16% 284 million yuan
Joincare 39.23 25.12% 398 million yuan
Hengrui Medicine 83.36 29.79% 336 million yuan
Fosun Pharma 86.80 21.14% 473 million yuan
2.2 Efficiency Indicator Ranking

Among the 7 comparable companies[0]:

  • Revenue per 100 Million Yuan in Sales Expenses
    : Buchang Pharmaceutical ranks 5th with 255 million yuan, lower than the industry average of 312 million yuan
  • Sales Expense Ratio
    : Buchang Pharmaceutical ranks 5th with 39.28%, higher than the industry average of 33.65%

Industry Benchmarking Conclusion:
Buchang Pharmaceutical’s marketing efficiency is in the mid-to-lower tier of the industry. Each 100 million yuan invested in sales expenses only generates 255 million yuan in revenue, lower than that of efficiently operated peer companies such as Fosun Pharma (473 million yuan) and Joincare (398 million yuan).

Buchang Pharmaceutical Marketing Efficiency Analysis Chart


III. Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Marketing Efficiency
3.1 Core Efficiency Indicators
Evaluation Dimension Indicator Value Industry Evaluation
Input-Output Ratio Revenue Generated per 100 Million Yuan in Sales Expenses 255 million yuan Mid-to-lower tier
Cost Burden Sales Expense Ratio 39.28% Relatively High
Marginal Contribution Marketing ROI (Marginal Contribution) 154.55% Medium
Expense Growth Trend Sales Expense Ratio Trend Continually Rising Negative
3.2 Analysis of Divergence Between Revenue and Expenses
Year Operating Revenue (100 million yuan) Sales Expenses (100 million yuan) Sales Expense Ratio Trend
2022 149.51 57.60 38.52% Revenue↓ Expense Ratio↑
2023 132.46 51.85 39.15% Revenue↓ Expense Ratio↑
2024 110.04 43.23 39.28% Revenue↓ Expense Ratio↑
2025H1 56.64 22.39 39.54% Revenue↓ Expense Ratio↑

Divergence Feature:
Buchang Pharmaceutical is facing a typical dilemma of “declining revenue, rising expense ratio”. Over the past three years, operating revenue has dropped from 14.951 billion yuan to 11.004 billion yuan, a decrease of 26.4%, while the sales expense ratio has risen from 38.52% to 39.54%. This divergence indicates:

  1. Diminishing Marginal Returns
    : The revenue contribution generated per unit of sales expense continues to decline
  2. Rigid Cost Characteristics
    : Academic promotion fees have strong rigidity and cannot be compressed in proportion to revenue decline
  3. Pressured Market Competitiveness
    : Product sales are under great pressure, requiring more marketing investment to maintain market share
3.3 Profitability Constraints

According to the company’s financial data[0]:

Profitability Indicator Value Industry Comparison
Net Profit Margin 0.02% Extremely Low
ROE 0.02% Extremely Low
Operating Profit Margin 1.87% Relatively Low
Gross Profit Margin 59.99% Relatively High

Core Contradiction:
Although Buchang Pharmaceutical maintains a high gross profit margin (59.99%), the sales expense ratio as high as 39.28% has severely eroded profit margins, resulting in a net profit margin of only 0.02%. This indicates that the company’s marketing investment has not been effectively converted into profit growth.


IV. Background Analysis of Pharmaceutical Industry Marketing Models
4.1 Industry Compliance Environment

In 2024-2025, the pharmaceutical industry is facing increasingly strict compliance supervision[2][3]:

  • Impact of the “Two-Invoice System”
    : Since the implementation of the “Two-Invoice System”, pharmaceutical enterprises have shifted from resolving sales expenses through “invoice passing” to compliant academic promotion models
  • Normalized Anti-Corruption
    : 14 departments including the National Health Commission jointly issued the “2025 Work Points for Correcting Unhealthy Trends in Pharmaceutical Purchase and Sales and Medical Services”, emphasizing “penetrating supervision”[3]
  • Measures for the Administration of Pharmaceutical Representatives
    : The National Medical Products Administration released a draft for comments, strictly limiting the functions of pharmaceutical representatives to pharmaceutical academic promotion
  • Compliance Guidelines
    : In January 2025, the State Administration for Market Regulation released the “Compliance Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Enterprises to Prevent Commercial Bribery Risks”, the first national-level compliance guidance document[3]
4.2 Sales Expense Characteristics of the Industry
Expense Type Characteristics Proportion Trend
Market/Academic Promotion Fees Conferences, academic activities, consulting, etc. Dominant (>80%)
Employee Compensation Labor costs of sales teams Stable
Advertising and Promotion Fees Brand promotion Shrinking Trend
Other Channels, business trips, etc. Shrinking Trend

The 93.28% proportion of market and academic promotion fees of Buchang Pharmaceutical reflects the typical characteristics of the industry after compliance transformation[2].


V. Comprehensive Evaluation Conclusion of Marketing Efficiency
5.1 Core Evaluation Conclusion
Evaluation Item Rating Description
Input-Output Efficiency
⭐⭐☆ Mid-to-lower tier, 255 million yuan in revenue per 100 million yuan in sales expenses, lower than the industry average
Expense Control Capability
⭐⭐☆ Weak, sales expense ratio has continued to climb to 39.4%
Reasonableness of Expense Structure
⭐⭐⭐⭐ Good, 93% is academic promotion fees, in line with industry compliance trends
Revenue Matching Degree
⭐⭐☆ Poor, revenue dropped 26% while expense ratio rose 7.4 percentage points
Contribution to Profitability
⭐☆☆☆ Extremely poor, high expense ratio severely erodes profits, net profit margin is only 0.02%

Comprehensive Evaluation
: Buchang Pharmaceutical’s marketing efficiency is in the mid-to-lower tier of the industry. Although its expense structure is in line with industry compliance trends, its input-output efficiency is low, and the continuous climb in sales expense ratio forms a divergence from declining revenue, posing significant pressure on the company’s profitability.

5.2 Key Problem Diagnosis
  1. Diminishing Marginal Returns
    : Although the academic promotion model is compliant, the revenue contribution generated per unit of investment continues to decline
  2. Expense Rigidity
    : 93% of academic promotion fees are difficult to adjust with business scale, forming a fixed cost burden
  3. Product Competitiveness
    : Sustained revenue decline may reflect that products are facing substitution competition or market shrinkage
  4. Fragile Profit Model
    : At the current expense ratio level, even if revenue stabilizes, profit space is extremely limited
5.3 Improvement Suggestions
Direction Specific Measures
Improve Efficiency
Optimize the input-output evaluation of academic promotion activities to improve precision marketing level
Product Upgrade
Increase R&D investment, enhance product competitiveness, and reduce reliance on marketing
Expense Optimization
Optimize expense structure within the compliance framework to improve expense utilization efficiency
Digital Transformation
Use digital tools to improve marketing efficiency and reduce marginal costs

References

[0] Gilin API Data - Buchang Pharmaceutical Financial Analysis and Market Data

[1] Gilin AI Financial Analysis - “Analysis of Reasons for Continuous Decline in Buchang Pharmaceutical’s Performance in the First Half of November 2025” (https://www.gilin.com.cn/essence1107088.html)

[2] Hwuason Tax Firm - “2024 Pharmaceutical Industry Tax Compliance Report” (http://www.hwuason.com/images/uploads/2024/01/12/2024_F6LuJKC.pdf)

[3] Global Law Office - “2024 Year-End Review of Life Sciences and Healthcare Industry Development and Compliance Supervision” (https://www.glo.com.cn/Content/2025/02-05/0917115213.html)

[4] Shandong Buchang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 2024 Annual Report (http://static.cninfo.com.cn/finalpage/2025-04-26/1223325841.PDF)

[5] Shandong Buchang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 2025 Semi-Annual Report (https://stockmc.xueqiu.com/202508/603858_20250828_YYBD.pdf)


Report Generation Time
: January 16, 2026
Product Name
: Gilin AI

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.