Clinical Efficacy Analysis Report of Zenitar Biosciences' Puyistat Mesylate (PM) for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (R/R DLBCL)

#biotech #clinical_trial #drug_development #lymphoma_treatment #hdac_inhibitor #oncology #rare_diseases #chinese_pharma
Positive
A-Share
January 17, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Based on the latest information I have collected, I will conduct a systematic and comprehensive analysis for you regarding the objective response rate (ORR) data and clinical endpoint achievement of Zenitar Biosciences’ Puyistat Mesylate (PM) as monotherapy for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL):

I. Summary of Clinical Trial Efficacy Data
1. Phase I Clinical Trial Results

According to academic literature reports, in the Phase I clinical trial,

the ORR reached 63.6% among 11 DLBCL patients treated with PM monotherapy, with a complete response (CR) rate of 45.5%
[1]. This data demonstrates strong anti-tumor activity in the HDAC inhibitor field.

2. Phase IIa Clinical Trial Results (NCT05563844)

In the pivotal Phase IIa multicenter clinical trial,

the overall ORR of PM monotherapy for relapsed/refractory DLBCL reached 69.0%
among the full population, with an ORR of 50% in double-expressor lymphoma (DEL) patients[1]. Notably, one DEL patient maintained a response for over 23 months during an extended dosing period, demonstrating durable efficacy.

3. Phase IIb Clinical Trial Progress

The Phase IIb clinical trial is being conducted at multiple centers nationwide to further verify the efficacy and safety of PM in a broader patient population[1].

II. Comparative Analysis of Efficacy Data with Existing Therapies
1. Comparison with Bispecific Antibodies
  • Mosunetuzumab monotherapy
    : Demonstrates promising efficacy in patients with R/R B-NHL
  • Glofitamab combined with Polatuzumab Vedotin (Pola) regimen
    : ORR of 79.6% and CR rate of 51%
  • Efficacy of Epcoritamab in DLBCL
    : ORR of 69% and CR rate of 39%
2. Comparison with Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs)
  • Polatuzumab Vedotin (Pola) monotherapy
    : ORR of 56%
  • Loncastuximab tesirine (Lonca) monotherapy
    : ORR of 48.3%
  • Pola-BR combination regimen
    : ORR of 70%
3. Efficacy Positioning Analysis

The 69.0% ORR of PM is “non-inferior or superior” to the efficacy of combination therapies of bispecific antibodies or ADCs (with ORR ranging from approximately 50% to 65%)
[2]. This comparison demonstrates the competitive advantage of PM as a monotherapy, especially in the field of relapsed/refractory DLBCL where treatment options are limited.

III. Assessment of Clinical Endpoint Achievement
1. Significance of Existing Data for Clinical Endpoints
Positive Signals:
  • Phase IIa ORR of 69.0%
    : Significantly higher than historical control data (e.g., 48.3% for Lonca monotherapy)
  • Prominent efficacy in the DEL patient subgroup
    : ORR of 50%, while DEL typically has a poor prognosis
  • CR rate of 45.5%
    (Phase I data): A relatively high level among HDAC inhibitors
  • Durable response
    : Some patients maintained a response for over 23 months
Regulatory Recognition:
  • Included in the conditional marketing review pathway by CDE
    : Indicates that the Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) of the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) recognizes the preliminary efficacy data of PM[2]
  • Selected for ASCO poster presentation for two consecutive years
    : Gained attention and recognition from the international academic community
2. Definition of “Achieving Clinical Endpoints”

According to the general principles of drug clinical trials:

Requirements for Confirmatory Clinical Trials:
  • Phase III clinical trials are the key stage for confirming efficacy
  • Requires statistical support from a sufficient sample size (typically α=0.05, power ≥80%)
  • Primary endpoints are usually ORR or progression-free survival (PFS), which require pre-specified statistical significance criteria
Current Status:
  • Phase IIa data is exploratory/concept validation in nature
  • Phase III clinical trial is ongoing
    (the first subjects in the experimental and control groups were enrolled in September 2025)
  • Planned to complete conditional registration and submit a new drug application (NDA) in 2027
3. Assessment of Clinical Significance
Verified Clinical Value:
  • Successful concept validation
    : Initially confirmed the efficacy of PM in R/R DLBCL
  • Differentiated advantage
    : As a highly selective HDAC I/IIb inhibitor, its safety profile may be superior to pan-HDAC inhibitors
  • Fills a treatment gap
    : Provides a new treatment option for patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL
Content to Be Confirmed:
  • Long-term survival benefits
    : Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) data need further verification in the Phase III trial
  • Confirmatory efficacy
    : The results of the Phase III trial will provide the final statistical conclusion
  • Safety profile
    : Safety data from a larger sample size
IV. Outlook for the Phase III Clinical Trial
1. Trial Design
  • The pivotal Phase III clinical trial
    is led by Professor Niu Ting from the Department of Hematology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, and Professor Zhao Weili from Shanghai Ruijin Hospital
  • Adopts a randomized controlled design
    (experimental group vs. control group)
2. Milestone Plan
  • July 2025
    : Initiated the Phase III registrational clinical trial in China
  • 2027
    : Complete conditional registration and submit a new drug application (NDA)
  • 2028
    : Obtain conditional approval and achieve commercial launch
3. Market Potential
  • Potential market size exceeds RMB 10 billion
  • If approved, it will become
    the world’s first highly selective HDAC inhibitor for monotherapy of R/R DLBCL
V. Conclusions and Recommendations
1. Current Conclusions

Based on existing data,

PM monotherapy for R/R DLBCL has shown positive efficacy signals
(ORR of 69.0%), and the regulatory authority (CDE) has included it in the conditional marketing review pathway accordingly. However, in accordance with strict drug development standards, “achieving clinical endpoints” typically requires the results of a Phase III confirmatory clinical trial for final confirmation.

2. Investment/R&D Perspective
  • Phase IIa data supports the continued advancement of the Phase III trial
  • Efficacy data has advantages in competition within the same field
  • Need to pay attention to the final results of the Phase III trial, especially PFS and OS data
3. Risk Warnings
  • Uncertainty exists regarding the results of the Phase III trial
  • Different safety signals may emerge with expanded sample size
  • Changes in the market competition landscape may affect commercial prospects

References

[1] Zenitar Biosciences Official Website - Puyistat Mesylate - Pivotal Phase III Clinical Study for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) (http://www.zenitar.com.cn/info.aspx?t=20&cid=208)

[2] Sina Finance - Tencent-backed Zenitar Biosciences Submits Listing Application to HKEX: Valuation Grew Nearly 4x in 5 Years with No Products on the Market Yet (https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2026-01-14/doc-inhhhnwp8305370.shtml)

[3] Academic Paper - Exploration of Treatment for Double-Expressor Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the New Drug Era (https://lcxyen.whuhzzs.com/data/article/lcxy/preview/pdf/lcxyxzz-37-9-612.pdf)

[4] Chinese Experts’ Consensus on Antibody-Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies (2025 Edition) (https://www.zhongliujie.com/index.php/news/show/id/1097.shtml)

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.