50% OFF

Cash Flow Impact Analysis of Xibei's Closure of 102 Stores

#restaurant_industry #cash_flow #store_closures #restructuring #financial_analysis #china_retail #crisis_management
Neutral
A-Share
January 18, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Based on the latest public reports and financial information, this article provides a detailed analysis of the impact of Xibei’s closure of 102 stores on its cash flow.

I. Overview of Xibei’s Store Closure Event

On January 15, 2026, Jia Guolong, founder of Xibei Catering, confirmed that the company will close 102 stores nationwide in one go, accounting for approximately 30% of its total store count, affecting about 4,000 employees [1]. The store closures are mainly concentrated in first- and second-tier cities such as Shanghai (19 stores), Beijing (10 stores), Shenzhen (8 stores), and Guangzhou (5 stores) [1].

II. Direct Impact Analysis on Cash Flow
1.
Current Loss Status and Cash Flow Pressure

According to public information, Xibei is currently facing severe cash flow pressure:

Indicator Data Explanation
Accumulated Losses
Over RMB 500 million
Since the pre-made food controversy in September 2025 [1]
November 2025 Revenue RMB 265 million Only half of the same period in previous years [1]
Monthly Salary Expenditure RMB 135 million Fixed expenditure [1]
Single-Store Net Profit Margin 5% Extremely meager [1]
Labor Cost Ratio Over 30% A significant increase from the previous 25% [2]
2.
Cash Flow Savings from Store Closures

Closing 102 stores will improve cash flow in the following aspects:

Rent Cost Savings
:

  • The store closures are concentrated in first- and second-tier cities, where commercial rents are the highest in the country
  • According to industry practices, rent costs for mid-to-high-end catering usually account for 15-25% of revenue
  • Assuming an average monthly rent of RMB 150,000-300,000 per store, annual rent savings from 102 stores can reach
    over RMB 180-360 million

Labor Cost Savings
:

  • Affecting about 4,000 employees, based on an average monthly salary of RMB 6,000-8,000
  • Annual labor cost savings are approximately
    RMB 290-380 million

Stopping Operational Losses
:

  • Currently, all 102 stores are operating at a loss
  • Timely closure can avoid continuous cash consumption
III. Cash Outflow Factors
1.
Employee Settlement Costs

Proper settlement for approximately 4,000 employees is a significant expense:

  • Economic compensation (e.g., using the N+1 standard)
  • Social security and housing fund settlement
  • Other statutory benefits
2.
Store Closure-Related Expenses
  • Store equipment disposal or relocation costs
  • Penalties (for terminating lease contracts)
  • Inventory disposal
IV. Cash Flow Consumption from Self-Rescue Measures

To address the crisis, the series of measures adopted by Xibei have further exacerbated cash flow pressure:

Measure Cost Estimate
No-Threshold RMB 100 Gift Vouchers Millions of vouchers issued, amounting to over
RMB 100 million
[1]
“Spend RMB 50, Get RMB 50 Rebate” Subsidy Large-scale marketing expenditure
Dish Price Reduction (20% on average) Directly impacts gross profit margin
Employee Allowances RMB 500 per person + RMB 300-800 per person [1]
V. Comprehensive Assessment
Short-Term Impact (Immediate)
  • Cash Outflow
    : Employee settlement costs are estimated at RMB 300-500 million
  • Cost Savings
    : Annualized rent + labor costs of approximately
    RMB 470-740 million
Long-Term Impact (Sustained)
  • Reduce the proportion of fixed costs and optimize the financial structure
  • Reduce loss sources and stop continuous cash consumption from approximately 102 stores
  • Alleviate the pressure of excessively high labor cost ratio
Estimated Cash Flow Improvement Range

Based on calculations using existing data, after closing 102 loss-making stores:

Item Estimated Annualized Impact
Cost Savings
RMB 500-800 million
Loss Reduction Approximately RMB 200-300 million (based on an average annual loss of RMB 200,000-300,000 per store)
Net Impact
Estimated annualized cash flow improvement of approximately RMB 300-500 million
VI. Conclusion

Xibei’s closure of 102 stores this time is a

“cutting off a limb to survive”
strategic contraction [1]. From a cash flow perspective:

  1. Significant Loss-Stop Effect
    : Closing loss-making stores can immediately stop continuous cash consumption
  2. Cost Structure Optimization
    : Significantly reduce high rent and labor costs in first- and second-tier cities
  3. Alleviate Urgent Pressure
    : Against the backdrop of accumulated losses exceeding RMB 500 million and a sharp drop in monthly revenue to RMB 265 million, store closures can effectively improve cash flow conditions

However, it should be noted that even if store closures can improve cash flow, Xibei still needs to face challenges such as brand reputation repair and consumer confidence rebuilding, which require more time to recover.


References

[1] Xinhua News - “Xibei to Close 102 Stores on a Large Scale, Concentrated in First- and Second-Tier Cities” (http://www.news.cn/food/20260115/29c72069d9fe44d5985514017b682ea4/c.html)

[2] 21st Century Business Herald - “Xibei Recently Deregistered Multiple Subsidiaries, Jia Guolong Confirms: Will Close 102 Stores” (https://www.21jingji.com/article/20260115/herald/b583287c35211429c202bdfe1a975384.html)

[3] Sina Finance - “Jia Guolong Responds to Store Closures: 102 Stores to Be Closed in the First Quarter, 17,000 Xibei Employees Have Tried Their Best” (https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2026-01-15/doc-inhhkwcm7519209.shtml)

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.