50% OFF

Analysis on the Identification of Related Party Transactions in the Over RMB 2 Billion Procurement Between JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. and Yongzhen Co., Ltd.

#关联交易 #上市公司治理 #光伏行业 #监管合规 #信息披露 #股权架构 #实质重于形式
A-Share
January 18, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

002459
--
002459
--
600089
--
600089
--

Based on collected materials, I will conduct a detailed analysis on whether the over RMB 2 billion procurement between JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. and Yongzhen Co., Ltd. constitutes a related party transaction.

I. Basic Information of the Transaction
1. Equity Relationship

According to the materials, JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. acquired a stake in Yongzhen Co., Ltd. in August 2021, with a shareholding ratio of

1.25%
[1]. This shareholding ratio is significantly lower than the 5% threshold for identifying related legal persons stipulated by the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges.

2. Transaction Scale

From 2020 to 2022, JA Solar Technology’s procurement amounts from Yongzhen Co., Ltd. were as follows:

  • 2020: RMB 594 million
  • 2021: RMB 852 million
  • 2022: RMB 1.229 billion

The cumulative procurement amount from 2022 to 2023 exceeded

RMB 2 billion
[1].


II. Statutory Criteria for Identifying Related Party Transactions

Pursuant to Article 10.1.3 of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange Stock Listing Rules, the criteria for identifying related legal persons of listed companies include [2][3]:

Identification Criteria Specific Standards
Controlling Relationship Legal persons that directly or indirectly control the listed company
Common Control Legal persons controlled by the controlling shareholder, excluding the listed company and its holding subsidiaries
Personnel Relationship Legal persons directly controlled by related natural persons, or in which related natural persons serve as directors or senior managers
Shareholding Threshold
Legal persons holding 5% or more of the listed company’s shares
Substance Over Form Other legal persons identified by the stock exchange or the listed company that may cause interest tilting

III. Analysis of Controversial Focus
1.
Formal Relationship: Does Not Meet Statutory Related Party Standards

From a formal perspective, Yongzhen Co., Ltd.

does not meet
the statutory criteria for being a related legal person:

  • JA Solar Technology only holds a 1.25% equity stake in Yongzhen Co., Ltd. (<5%)
  • Yongzhen Co., Ltd. is not an enterprise directly controlled by JA Solar Technology’s controlling shareholder or actual controller
  • No directors or senior managers of JA Solar Technology hold positions in Yongzhen Co., Ltd.
2.
Substantive Relationship: Exists Significant Interest Relevance

Nevertheless, multiple signs indicate that there may be related relationships between the two parties that require attention:

First, Yongzhen Co., Ltd. voluntarily discloses the transaction by analogy with related party transactions.
In its prospectus, Yongzhen Co., Ltd. disclosed its transactions with JA Solar Technology
by analogy with related party transactions
[1], a practice that usually indicates a special interest relationship between the transaction parties.

Second, the “middleman” role of Jingkang Photovoltaic is questionable.
During the procurement process, Yangzhou Jingkang Photovoltaic Materials Co., Ltd. (Jingkang Photovoltaic) acted as an intermediary [1]:

  • Jingkang Photovoltaic procured photovoltaic frames from Yongzhen Co., Ltd.
  • Then resold them to Hebei Jinglong, a subsidiary of JA Solar Technology
  • Yongzhen Co., Ltd. directly delivered the products to Hebei Jinglong

Third, there is a personnel relationship between Jingkang Photovoltaic and JA Solar Technology.
Research findings show [1]:

  • The
    sole director of GLC HK
    , the controlling shareholder of Jingkang Photovoltaic, is
    Huang Jiongxiang
  • Huang Jiongxiang holds shares in JA Solar Technology through Zhou Bofang (allocated 7.4383 million shares in the 2022 private placement)
  • The general manager of Jingkang Photovoltaic before its deregistration has the same name as a key employee of JA Solar Technology

Fourth, the transaction amount is substantial.
The procurement amount from 2022 to 2023 exceeded
RMB 2 billion
, accounting for a considerable proportion of Yongzhen Co., Ltd.'s operating revenue.


IV. The “Substance Over Form” Principle in Regulatory Practice
1. Regulatory Basis

The Stock Listing Rules clearly stipulate that the stock exchange or the listed company may, in accordance with the

principle of “substance over form”
, identify other legal persons that have a special relationship with the listed company and may cause interest tilting as related parties [2][3].

2. Case Comparison

Case of Xinte Energy
: JA Solar Technology identified Xinte Energy as a related party, although the enterprise controlled by Jin Baofang only held an indirect stake of 1.02%. JA Solar Technology stated that this was “due to the large transaction amount, based on the principle of substance over form” [1].

Comparative Analysis
: Although the shareholding ratio is similarly low (1.25%), the transaction amount with Yongzhen Co., Ltd. (over RMB 2 billion) is far higher than that with Xinte Energy, so the principle of “substance over form” should logically be applied.


V. Legal Risks in the Identification of Related Party Transactions
1. Potential Non-Compliance Risks

If JA Solar Technology fails to identify Yongzhen Co., Ltd. as a related party, it may face the following issues:

Risk Type Specific Manifestations
Information Disclosure Violation
Failure to disclose the transaction amount with related parties and the review procedures in accordance with regulations
Procedural Deficiencies
Failure to perform procedures such as abstention from voting on related party transactions and prior approval by independent directors
Questionable Pricing Fairness
Difficulty in verifying whether the pricing of related party transactions is fair
Interest Transfer Risk
Evading regulatory review by using the form of non-related parties
2. Key Regulatory Focus Areas

According to the analysis of Securities Misrepresentation Cases Accepted by the Shanghai Financial Court,

concealing the identity of related parties
is one of the important types of misrepresentation involving financial information [1].


VI. Conclusions and Recommendations
1. Core Conclusions

From a legal form perspective
, JA Solar Technology and Yongzhen Co., Ltd.
do not fully meet
the statutory criteria for identifying related parties (the shareholding ratio is below 5%).

From a commercial substance perspective
, in view of the following factors, the
principle of “substance over form” should be prudently considered for application
to this transaction:

  1. The transaction amount is substantial (over RMB 2 billion)
  2. The existence of a special intermediate link, i.e., Jingkang Photovoltaic
  3. Involvement in interest arrangements of personnel related to JA Solar Technology’s shareholders
  4. Yongzhen Co., Ltd. voluntarily disclosed the transaction by analogy with related party transactions
2. Professional Recommendations
  1. Listed Company Level
    : JA Solar Technology should re-evaluate whether to identify Yongzhen Co., Ltd. as a related party, and apply the principle of “substance over form” with reference to the Xinte Energy case

  2. Regulatory Level
    : It is recommended that the stock exchange pay attention to the compliance of this transaction and require the listed company to supplement the disclosure of the basis for identifying the related relationship

  3. Investor Level
    : Pay attention to the potential interest transfer risk of this transaction and the completeness of information disclosure

  4. IPO Review of Yongzhen Co., Ltd.
    : As a candidate for listing, Yongzhen Co., Ltd. should fully explain the commercial rationality and pricing fairness of its transactions with JA Solar Technology


References

[1] Golden Research Institute South Capital Center. Analysis on the Identification of Related Parties Behind the Over RMB 2 Billion Procurement Between JA Solar Technology and Yongzhen Co., Ltd. January 16, 2026

[2] Shenzhen Stock Exchange. Stock Listing Rules (Revised 2014)

[3] Zhong Lun Law Firm. Illustrated Guide to Related Party Identification and Determination Under Different Rules. October 28, 2019

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.