50% OFF

Analysis of the Impact of Non-Bank Deposit Changes on A-Share Liquidity and Investment Sentiment

#non_bank_deposit #m1_m2_spread #a_shares_market #monetary_policy #capital_flows #market_sentiment #deposit_shifting
Neutral
A-Share
January 19, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Based on the latest financial data and market analysis, I provide you with an in-depth research report on

the Impact of Non-Bank Deposit Changes on A-Share Market Liquidity and Investment Sentiment
.


I. Core Data Interpretation
1.1 In-Depth Implications of the 2.84 Trillion Yuan Year-on-Year Reduction in Non-Bank Deposit Decline

December 2025 financial data shows that

non-bank deposits decreased by 330 billion yuan, representing a year-on-year reduction of 2.84 trillion yuan less than the previous year
[1]. This data needs to be interpreted from two dimensions:

Surface Interpretation (Base Effect):

  • Starting from December 1, 2024, interest rates on interbank deposits of non-bank institutions were included in self-disciplinary management, causing a sharp reduction of
    3.17 trillion yuan
    in non-bank deposits that month, the largest monthly contraction in history[1]
  • This created a significant low base effect, resulting in a substantial “reduction in decline” in the year-on-year data for December 2025

In-Depth Interpretation (Adjusted Analysis):

Lin Yingqi, an analyst at CICC, pointed out that after adjusting for this base factor, non-bank deposits
still increased by approximately 200 billion yuan year-on-year
[1], reflecting a net inflow in real capital flows.

1.2 Widening Monetary Spread: Signal of Capital Activation
Indicator December 2025 December 2024 Change
M2 YoY Growth Rate 8.5% 7.3%
Up 1.2 pct
[2]
M1 YoY Growth Rate 3.8% 4.4%
Down 0.6 pct
[2]
M2-M1 Spread 4.7 pct 2.9 pct
Significantly Widened

The M2-M1 spread widened to

4.7 percentage points
, indicating increased capital activation, with part of time deposits shifting to demand deposits, providing incremental capital sources for the capital market[2].


II. Analysis of Liquidity Transmission Mechanism
2.1 Capital Flow Framework
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    Capital Flow Transmission Chain          │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                              │
│   Improvement in Non-Bank Deposits → Increased Capital Activation → Deposit Shifting → Equity Asset Allocation │
│        ↓              ↓              ↓             ↓        │
│   Bank Liability Restructuring → Widened M2-M1 Spread → Household Deposit Growth Rate → Stock Market Incremental Capital │
│                                                              │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
2.2 Three Key Driving Factors

Factor 1: Quarterly Wealth Management Product Repatriation

  • Affected by seasonal factors, wealth management products flow back to the banking system at the end of the quarter
  • However, the scale of repatriation is lower than the same period in previous years, indicating limited capital outflow pressure

Factor 2: Active Stock Market Attracts Capital Inflows

Zhang Weikang, an analyst at Industrial Research, clearly stated:
“The active stock market is one of the important reasons for the reduced decline in non-bank deposits”
[1]

Factor 3: Sustained Impact of the “September 24” Market Rally

Ma Kunpeng, an analyst at CITIC Securities, believes that
the “September 24” rally drove a large amount of deposits into the capital market, with a large-scale flow back at the end of the year
[1]

2.3 Verification of Household Deposit “Shifting” via Three Indicators

The monitoring framework constructed by China Galaxy Securities shows[3]:

Monitoring Indicator December 2025 Trend Judgment
Household Deposit Growth Rate (Estimated) 9.68% Month-on-Month Increase Seasonal Factor
Gap Between Household Deposit Growth Rate and M2 1.18 pct Narrowed (1.56→1.18)
Supports Deposit Shifting
12-Month Rolling Sum of New Non-Bank Deposits 6.4 Trillion Yuan Significant Increase
Supports Deposit Shifting

Two of the three indicators

strongly support the judgment of “household deposit shifting”
to the stock market[3].


III. Implications for A-Share Market Liquidity
3.1 Confirmation of Incremental Capital Sources

Corporate Savings Flowing Back to Asset Management Products

Yi Huan, an analyst at Huatai Securities, analyzed that household and non-bank deposits saw year-on-year reductions of 390 billion yuan and 2.84 trillion yuan less than the previous year respectively, while corporate deposits saw a year-on-year increase of 558.7 billion yuan less than the previous year. This

“may reflect the impact of corporate savings flowing back to asset management products such as stocks and funds”
[1].

Allocation Adjustments by Non-Bank Financial Institutions

Li Chao, an analyst at Zheshang Securities, believes that the asset reallocation in December

“was likely completed more through structural adjustments within the financial system (institutional and product ends)”
rather than directly manifested as a large-scale outflow of household deposits[1].

3.2 Positive Liquidity Signals
Dimension Signal Intensity Specific Performance
M2 Growth Rate
Moderately Positive
Rebounded to 8.5%, a stage high
Non-Bank Deposits
Moderately Positive
Still saw an increase of 200 billion yuan year-on-year after adjusting for base effect
Household Deposit Structure
Moderately Positive
Narrowed gap indicates activation trend
Corporate Deposits
Moderately Negative
558.7 billion yuan less increase reflects capital outflow
3.3 Risk Factor Warnings

Zhang Yu, Chief Economist at Huachuang Securities, pointed out that there is a possibility of

“disintermediation from real economy to virtual economy”
in current capital flows[1], requiring attention to:

⚠️

Structural Contradiction
: Divergence between weak corporate deposits and strong household/non-bank deposits
⚠️
Sustainability to Be Verified
: Whether the data can be maintained after the low base disturbance weakens
⚠️
Policy Sensitivity
: Real interest rates remain high, and household financing behavior remains “defensive”[2]


IV. Assessment of Impact on Investment Sentiment
4.1 Interpretation of Sentiment Signals

Positive Signals:

  1. Raised Expectations for Incremental Capital

    • The improvement in non-bank deposits indicates that off-market capital is seeking allocation opportunities
    • Stock market activity and capital inflows form a positive feedback loop
  2. Recovery in Risk Appetite

    • The booming trading volume in the equity market matches the improvement in non-bank deposits
    • Capital is shifting from “defensive” to “offensive” assets
  3. Increased Institutional Confidence

    • CICC predicts that
      “the capital market will be active in January this year, and the entry of deposit capital into the market is expected to drive up non-bank deposits”
      [1]

Neutral Signals:

  1. Seasonal Disturbances Need to Be Excluded

    • Seasonal factors such as year-end wealth management product repatriation affect data interpretation
    • Need to combine January-February data to verify trend sustainability
  2. Fading Low Base Effect

    • Part of the high growth in 2025 data comes from the base effect
    • Subsequent year-on-year data may return to normal
4.2 Quantitative Assessment of Investment Sentiment
Assessment Dimension Score (0-100) Status
Liquidity Ease
75
Moderately Positive
Stock Market Attractiveness
80
Positive
Risk Appetite
70
Moderately Recovering
Incremental Capital Expectations
78
Moderately Positive

Comprehensive Judgment: Investment sentiment is on a recovery track, but sustainability needs to be observed


V. Summary of Mainstream Brokerage Views
Institution Analyst Core View
CICC
Lin Yingqi After adjusting for the base effect, non-bank deposits still increased by approximately 200 billion yuan year-on-year, possibly due to the impact of deposit shifting into the market
Industrial Research
Zhang Weikang The active stock market is one of the important reasons for the reduced decline in non-bank deposits
Huachuang Securities
Zhang Yu Non-bank deposits match the booming trading volume in the equity market, and there is a possibility of “disintermediation from real economy to virtual economy” in corporate savings
Huatai Securities
Yi Huan Reflects the impact of corporate savings flowing back to asset management products such as stocks and funds
CITIC Securities
Ma Kunpeng The “September 24” rally drove a large amount of deposits into the capital market, with a large-scale flow back at the end of the year
Galaxy Securities
Zhang Di The 330 billion yuan decrease in non-bank deposits is still significantly higher than the 2022-2023 average

VI. Investment Strategy Recommendations
6.1 Liquidity Allocation Directions

Based on the capital flows revealed by changes in non-bank deposits, it is recommended to focus on:

  1. Sectors Preferred by Incremental Capital

    • The allocation ratio of equity assets is expected to increase
    • Focus on growth sectors that benefit from capital inflows
  2. Targets Related to Asset Management Products

    • Against the background of wealth management fund repatriation, targets related to bank wealth management subsidiaries
    • Asset management institutions such as public funds
  3. Trading Volume-Sensitive Industries

    • Securities sector (benefits from increased market activity)
    • Internet finance platforms
6.2 Risk Hedging Recommendations
  1. Monitor Changes in the M1-M2 Spread

    • If the trend of widening spread continues, it is beneficial to equity assets
    • If the spread narrows, need to be alert to the risk of liquidity tightening
  2. Monitor Household Deposit Activation Indicators

    • Continuously track the 12-month rolling sum of new non-bank deposits
    • Monitor changes in the gap between household deposit growth rate and M2
  3. Policy Tracking

    • Monitor the implementation of monetary policy during the Two Sessions
    • Track the impact of changes in real interest rates on household behavior

VII. Conclusion

Core Conclusions:

  1. The

    2.84 trillion yuan year-on-year reduction in non-bank deposit decline
    is mainly driven by the dual factors of a low base effect and active stock market, with data still showing a real net inflow of approximately 200 billion yuan after adjusting for the base effect[1]

  2. Liquidity signals are moderately positive
    : The rebound in M2, widened M2-M1 spread, and improvement in non-bank deposits collectively point to increased capital activation and a continuing trend of deposit shifting[2][3]

  3. Investment sentiment is recovering
    : Off-market capital is seeking allocation opportunities, and the attractiveness of equity assets has increased, but the sustainability of the trend needs to be observed

  4. Risk Warning
    : The current phenomenon of “disintermediation from real economy to virtual economy” in capital flows deserves attention, and it is necessary to continuously track policy changes and the sustainability of capital flows


References

[1] Sina Finance - “Non-Bank Deposits See 2.84 Trillion Yuan Less Year-on-Year Decline, Interpreted by Brokerage Analysts” (https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/zqgd/2026-01-18/doc-inhhtpht1983072.shtml)

[2] Wall Street Insights - “Deconstructing 2025 Financial Closing Data: M2 Rebound Driven by Wealth Management Fund Repatriation” (https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2026-01-16/doc-inhhncwz2691705.shtml)

[3] China Galaxy Securities - “Interpretation of December 2025 Financial Data and State Council Information Office Press Conference” (https://bigquant.com/square/paper/7ac3efa5-b1ea-4052-a1b7-807fabb178ff)


Chart Notes:

The above chart shows the analysis framework of the impact of non-bank deposit changes on A-share market liquidity, covering four dimensions: divergence between M1 and M2 trends, monthly change comparison of non-bank deposits, logical framework of capital flows, and A-share market sentiment signal lights.

Chart: Analysis of the Impact of Non-Bank Deposit Changes on A-Share Market Liquidity

Chart: Analysis of A-Share Market Impact of the 2.84 Trillion Yuan Year-on-Year Reduction in Non-Bank Deposit Decline

Previous
No previous article
Next
No next article
Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.