Analysis of the Impact of Concentrated Purchase Restrictions on Equity Funds on A-Share Market Capital Conditions and Investor Behavior
Unlock More Features
Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
Since the start of 2026, the A-share market has recorded a strong opening, with equity funds rolling out concentrated purchase restrictions. According to statistics from Wind, nearly
This wave of purchase restrictions presents several notable characteristics:
| Fund House | Restricted Products | Purchase Limit Amount | Effective Date of Restriction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yongying Fund | Yongying High-End Equipment Smart Selection, Yongying Information Industry Smart Selection | RMB 1 million per trading day | Effective January 14 |
| China Europe Fund | China Europe Small Cap Growth Fund | Suspend large-amount subscriptions | Effective January 13 |
| E Fund | E Fund Kexiang, E Fund Strategic Growth | Suspend institutional subscriptions | Effective January 13 |
| Debang Fund | Debang Steady Growth | RMB 100,000 for Class A / RMB 10,000 for Class C | Effective January 14 |
| Xingzheng Global Fund | Xingquan Active Allocation Mixed, etc. | RMB 500,000 per trading day | Effective January 13 |
Market data shows that on January 13, the single-day turnover of the A-share market hit a new high, approaching
Fund purchase restrictions have had a significant regulatory effect on market capital conditions, mainly reflected in the following aspects:
- The inflow speed of some capital has slowed significantly, avoiding market volatility caused by concentrated capital inflows
- After the Debang Steady Growth Fund saw a single-day net value increase of 8.32% on January 12, strict purchase restrictions were implemented on January 13[3]
- The capital diversion effect is obvious, as investors have begun to pay attention to other high-performing funds without purchase restrictions
According to market data estimates, as of January 13,
| Capital Channel | Scale (in RMB 100 million) | Proportion | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Newly Launched Funds | 43.52 | 6.2% | Equity products account for over 70% of the total |
| Position Building by Recent New Funds | 453 | 64.7% | 119 equity funds launched in December 2025 |
| Net Inflow of Listed ETFs | 212.42 | 30.4% | Popular theme ETFs are the main capital attractors |
Total |
708.94 |
100% |
— |
Among them,
- In 2025, the scale of ETFs increased by RMB 254.6 billion, reaching RMB 6.27 trillion
- China Asset Management (ChinaAMC) has become the first company with ETF management scale exceeding RMB 1 trillion
- The scale of cross-border ETFs exceeded the RMB 1 trillion mark for the first time, reaching RMB 1.0008 trillion[5]
| Fund Name | Scale at end of 2025 (in RMB 100 million) | Scale as of January 13, 2026 (in RMB 100 million) | Growth Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| GF Media ETF | 26.43 | 107.67 | +307% |
| Yongying Satellite ETF | 66.6 | 155.92 | +134% |
| Harvest Software ETF | 60.25 | 101.67 | +69% |
From January 9 to 13, capital was highly concentrated in popular themes:
- Net subscription amount of GF Media ETF: RMB 7.064 billion
- Net subscription amount of Yongying Satellite ETF: RMB 4.901 billion
- Net subscription amount of Southern CSI 1000 ETF: RMB 4.193 billion
- Avoided the risk of bubbles caused by excessive concentrated capital in the short term
- Provided fund managers with more time for unhurried position building and adjustment
- Helped maintain stable market operation, preventing a "fast bull market" from turning into a "frenzied bull market"
- Tracking errors of some ETF link funds have increased significantly
- For example, on January 13, the Yongying SZSE Commercial Satellite Communication Industry ETF Link Fund fell 1.99% in a single day, a large deviation from the ETF’s 4.5% drop on the same day[4]
- Rapid short-term capital inflows have left funds insufficient time to build positions
The core purpose of fund purchase restrictions is to
| Behavioral Change | Degree of Impact | Manifestation Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Increased Risk Awareness | 80% | Investors pay more attention to fund risk levels |
| Enhanced Rational Investment Awareness | 75% | Reduced blind chasing of hot sectors |
| Increased Demand for Diversified Investment | 68% | Investors begin to focus on diversified allocation |
| Increased Willingness for Long-Term Holding | 55% | Focus on the long-term performance of funds |
| Reduced Chasing-Up Behavior | 42% | Avoid concentrated entry at high points |
Yang Delong, Chief Economist of Qianhai Kaiyuan Fund, pointed out that purchase restrictions can create a sense of tight supply of shares, and the "scarcity effect" will attract more investors to subscribe within the limit[3]. This psychological effect may intensify investors’ pursuit of high-performing funds in the short term, but it will help cultivate rational investment habits in the long run.
Risk assessments of popular funds by different sales platforms have diverged:
- Some platforms have upgraded the risk level of Debang Steady Growth to "High Risk"
- Removed and optimized the position increase ranking function
- The weekly page views of this product exceeded 2.1 million[2]
- Investors have begun to pay more attention to the strategy capacity and investment boundaries of funds
- Emphasize the matching degree between fund managers’ investment styles and the market environment
- Focus on fund scale management and performance stability
- Purchase restrictions have prompted investors to diversify their investments into different products
- Pay attention to diversified options such as index funds and "Fixed Income Plus" products
- Emphasize the rationality of asset allocation
Industry insiders generally believe that purchase restrictions on high-performing funds are mainly to
- High-performing funds continue to receive capital favor, and timely purchase restrictions can prevent the risk of strategy failure caused by surging scale
- Effectively protect the investment returns of existing holders
- Some products are constrained by the capacity limits of specific investment strategies
- Return Dilution: A large influx of capital in the short term will dilute the returns of existing fund holders
- Increased Operational Difficulty: Excessive fund scale leads to higher costs for position adjustment and stock replacement
- Strategy Failure: Some quantitative strategies are highly sensitive to scale
- Increased Net Value Volatility: Forced frequent position adjustments lead to net value fluctuations
Different from the industry’s pursuit of scale expansion in previous bull markets,
Recently, hot thematic market trends have mainly concentrated on
- Since the start of 2026 up to January 13, the return rate of Yongying Information Industry Smart Selection has reached 35.00%
- Boosted by the listing expectations of domestic large model enterprises
- Institutions predict that AI applications are expected to achieve dual breakthroughs in the C-end and B-end in 2026
- Since the start of 2026, the return rate of Ping An CSI Satellite Industry Index Fund has reached 18.53%
- Guolian Minsheng Securities predicts that 2026 will be the first year of commercial aerospace industrialization
- A trillion-level blue ocean market has already opened
| Capital Source | Scale Expectation | Driving Factors |
|---|---|---|
| Household Deposit Migration | RMB 2-4 trillion | Low interest rate environment, maturity of time deposits |
| Increased Allocation by Insurance Capital | Continuous Inflow | "Start-of-Year Surge" effect, increased preference for equities |
| Private Equity Quantitative Capital | High Activity | Trading opportunities brought by thematic rotation |
| Household Savings Transfer | Marginal Increase | Profit-making effect of funds becomes evident |
- Reasonably control scale to maintain strategy effectiveness
- Dynamically adjust purchase restriction policies to optimize capital inflow rhythm
- Strengthen investor education and guide long-term investment
- View purchase restrictions rationally, and do not blindly chase "one-day sold-out funds"
- Focus on the long-term performance and risk control of funds
- Adopt a "barbell strategy" to balance technology and dividend assets
- Emphasize diversification of asset allocation
- Overheated market sentiment may lead to short-term corrections
- Thematic sectors have large volatility
- Be vigilant against the risk of chasing high prices
- The technology market is expected to expand from computing infrastructure to applications
- The first year of commercial aerospace industrialization has begun
- The valuation center of the Hong Kong stock technology sector is expected to move upward
Concentrated purchase restrictions on equity funds have had a far-reaching impact on A-share market capital conditions and investor behavior:
-
Impact on Capital Conditions: Effectively adjusted the rhythm of capital inflows, avoided volatility risks caused by excessive concentrated capital in the short term, and promoted the stable entry of capital and optimized structural allocation.
-
Impact on Investor Behavior: Guided investors to shift from chasing short-term returns to focusing on long-term value, enhanced awareness of rational investment, and promoted the maturation of investment behavior.
-
Impact on Industry Development: Promoted the transformation of the fund industry from scale expansion to high-quality development, forming a new industry consensus of "protecting the interests of holders".
Looking ahead, with the continuous entry of incremental capital such as household deposit migration and increased allocation by insurance capital, the liquidity of the A-share market is expected to remain abundant. Against the background of regulators advocating "long-term capital entry and a slow bull market pattern", fund purchase restriction measures will help the market develop steadily and achieve sustainable and healthy development.
[1] Sina Finance - "7 Billion Funds Suddenly Hit by ‘Capital Torrent’, Spring Market and Purchase Restriction Wave Unfold Simultaneously" (https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2026-01-13/doc-inhhecrv4900996.shtml)
[2] Securities Times Network - "High-Performing Equity Funds Implement Concentrated ‘Flow Restrictions’" (https://www.stcn.com/article/detail/3593768.html)
[3] Southern Plus - "Purchase Restrictions Right at the Start of the Year? Debang Fund Adjusts Caps Twice in 24 Hours" (https://www.nfnews.com/content/Kyll8XMGyD.html)
[4] Shanghai Securities News - "Over RMB 10 Billion in Capital Enters the Market via ETFs, Off-Fund Popularity Also Rises Significantly" (http://fund.eastmoney.com/news/11794,202601143619353327.html)
[5] Phoenix Net Finance - "Trillion-Yuan ‘Milestone’, Scale Doubled in a Year, ‘Purchase Restrictions’ and ‘Premium’ Become Key Words" (https://finance.ifeng.com/c/8pu357ji70k)
Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
