In-depth Analysis of Financial Sustainability of China Online (300364.SZ)'s Overseas Short Drama Business
Unlock More Features
Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
Related Stocks
I have now collected sufficient data, and I will provide you with a systematic and comprehensive analysis report.
According to China Online’s 2025 annual performance forecast, the company expects a net loss attributable to shareholders of listed companies of
Notably, the loss in the fourth quarter showed a
| Financial Indicators | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 (E) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Profit Attributable to Parent (RMB 100 million) | -3.01 | -2.43 | -5.8~-7.0 |
| Net Profit After Deducting Non-recurring Gains and Losses (RMB 100 million) | -3.50 | -2.71 | -5.79~-6.99 |
| Operating Revenue (RMB 100 million) | ~14 | ~15 | ~12-14 |
| Sales Expense Ratio | ~45% | ~65% | 87% |
Data source: Compiled from company announcements and brokerage research reports[1][2][3]
China Online’s sales expenses in the first three quarters of 2025 reached as high as
For every RMB 100 of operating revenue, RMB 87 is spent on marketing and promotion
This high sales expense ratio mainly stems from the following cost structure:
| Cost Item | Amount/Rate | Industry Comparison |
|---|---|---|
| User Acquisition Cost via Paid Traffic | 12-14 USD/user | Industry average: 15-20 USD/user |
| Production Cost per Short Drama | 150,000-180,000 USD/title | Year-on-year increase of over 20% |
| Traffic Acquisition Cost per Short Drama | Approx. 1.5 million USD/title | 10 times the production cost |
| Payback Period | 60-90 days | High pressure on capital occupation |
Industry data shows that there is a harsh formula for overseas short dramas:
| Company | Sales Expense Ratio | Profit Status | Business Model |
|---|---|---|---|
China Online |
87% | Loss-making | ReelShort(IAP) |
Kunlun Tech (DramaWave) |
Approx. 70% | Loss-making | IAA+IAP Hybrid |
Dianzhong Tech (DramaBox) |
Approx. 60% | Loss-making | IAA-oriented |
Netflix |
Approx. 15% | Profitable | Mature Subscription Model |
It can be seen that
Despite pressure on financial data, China Online’s strategic layout in the overseas short drama market has achieved remarkable results:
| Business/Indicator | Data | Industry Position |
|---|---|---|
ReelShort’s U.S. Market Share |
29.13% | Ranked 1st |
FlareFlow’s Cumulative Downloads |
19 million (7 months after launch) | 3rd among global short drama apps |
Countries/Regions Covered |
177 | Leading in globalization |
Supported Languages |
11 types | - |
ReelShort’s H1 2025 Revenue |
USD 130 million | 1st in the industry |
Monthly Active Users (MAUs) of the Platform |
600,000 | - |
2024 Revenue of CMS Subsidiary |
RMB 2.9 billion | - |
Data source: SensorTower, various company announcements and brokerage research reports[1][3][4]
The overseas short drama market is in a period of explosive growth:
- First 8 months of 2025: The total revenue of the overseas micro-short drama market reachedUSD 1.525 billion, a year-on-year increase of194.9%
- Total downloads are approximately 730 million, a year-on-year increase of370.4%
- Among 431 short drama apps worldwide, 40 originate from Chinese enterprises
- The top 50 apps monopolize 98.45%of the market share[1]
| Platform | Parent Company | Market Share | Strategic Features |
|---|---|---|---|
ReelShort |
China Online (49.2%) | Approx. 29% | North American market + local original content + IAP model |
DramaBox |
Dianzhong Tech | Approx. 25% | Emerging markets + translated dramas + IAA model |
ShortMax |
Maple Leaf Interactive | Approx. 10% | Follower |
DramaWave |
Kunlun Tech | Approx. 8% | New Entrant |
Data source: SensorTower and industry reports[3][4][5]
Based on API data and results of financial analysis tools[0]:
| Risk Indicator | China Online | Industry Benchmark | Risk Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
Asset-Liability Ratio |
66.56% | 32.11% | ⚠️ High Risk |
Current Ratio |
0.83 | 1.5 (Safety Value) | 🔴 Short-term Solvency Risk |
Quick Ratio |
0.54 | 1.0 (Safety Value) | 🔴 Tight Liquidity |
ROE(TTM) |
-73.65% | 8% | 🔴 Severe Loss |
Net Profit Margin (TTM) |
-42.23% | - | 🔴 Continuous Cash Burn |
Operating Cash Flow |
-RMB 173 million | - | 🔴 Severe Mismatch |
As of the end of Q3 2025, the company’s asset-liability ratio soared from
- Insufficient short-term solvency: The company may face pressure from tight capital chains
- Weak asset liquidity: Quick assets are difficult to cover short-term debts
- Excessive financial leverage: Increased debt burden and greater pressure from interest expenses
The company’s accumulated losses since its listing have exceeded
- Per share net assets continue to be diluted
- Ability to withstand external economic fluctuations is weakened
- Shareholders’ equity continues to be diluted
China Online’s overseas short drama model is based on the following logic:
[Logic in the Investment Phase]
High user acquisition cost via paid traffic → Growth in user scale → Formation of brand effect → Reduction in reliance on paid traffic → Achievement of profitability
However, the
- The market space is large enough to accommodate initial investments
- User retention and brand effect can reduce user acquisition costs in the later stage
- The competitive pattern will eventually stabilize
| Dimension of Challenge | Specific Performance |
|---|---|
User Acquisition Cost Pressure |
12-14 USD/user, which erodes profits despite being lower than the industry average |
Rising Content Costs |
Cost per short drama increased from 120,000-150,000 USD to 150,000-180,000 USD (+20%) |
Long Payback Period |
60-90 day payback period, with severe capital occupation |
Intensified Competition |
309 new apps launched in H1 2025 (+110% year-on-year) |
Rise of Local Players |
Local players such as Ukraine’s MyDrama and India’s KukuTV are accelerating their entry |
Competition from Giants |
Global giants such as Disney and TikTok are also laying out in the short drama track |
According to industry research data:
80%-90% of overseas short dramas fail to recoup costs[5]
Leading platforms are also facing losses:
- ReelShort’s H1 2025 loss was RMB 46.5115 million
- Kunlun Tech (DramaWave)'s net loss in the first three quarters was RMB 665 million
This indicates that
| Valuation Indicator | China Online | Interpretation of Abnormality |
|---|---|---|
| P/E (TTM) | -39.47x | No practical significance in a loss-making state |
| P/B | 48.02x | Far exceeding the industry average (5x), reflecting market expectations for growth |
| Market Capitalization | USD 2.27 billion | Up 29.29% year-to-date, stock price performance deviates from fundamentals |
The company’s P/B ratio is as high as 48 times, far exceeding the average level of the media industry (approx. 5 times), indicating that
Despite pressure on fundamentals, China Online’s stock price performance is strong:
| Period | Increase |
|---|---|
| 1 Month | +30.76% |
| 3 Months | +25.49% |
| 6 Months | +15.75% |
| 1 Year | +29.29% |
| 3 Years | +232.91% |
This deviation may stem from:
- Overall valuation increase of the AI application sector
- Market expectations for the company’s “globalization + AI” strategy
- Speculation by short-term funds on concepts
- Q4 loss narrowing trend: The loss narrowed by 39%-80% month-on-month, indicating marginal improvement
- Stable market share: ReelShort ranks first in the U.S. market, and FlareFlow is growing rapidly
- Policy support: The 15th Five-Year Plan for Cultural Power Strategy encourages the export of cultural products
- AI empowerment: The self-developed “COL XiaoYao” large model and AI content tool chain can reduce costs
- First-mover advantage in globalization: Covers 177 countries and regions, forming channel barriers
- Cash flow pressure: Negative operating cash flow and increased debt burden
- Intensified industry competition: New players continue to enter, and traffic costs keep rising
- Unverified profit model: No successful profit precedent in the industry
- Doubts about user retention: Whether high user acquisition costs can be converted into long-term user value
- Macroeconomic risks: Exchange rate fluctuations and geopolitics may affect overseas business
| Indicator | Focus Direction | Turnaround Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Sales Expense Ratio | Whether it can drop from 87% to below 50% | Improvement in paid traffic efficiency |
| Asset-Liability Ratio | Whether it can stabilize below 50% | Controllable financial risks |
| Quarterly Net Profit | When to achieve single-quarter break-even | Business model verification |
| User Retention Rate | Whether 1-day/7-day/30-day retention improves | Product competitiveness |
| Market Share | Whether it can be maintained above 25% | Competitive barriers |
| Dimension | Rating | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Health | 🔴 Poor | High leverage, tight liquidity, continuous losses |
| Business Growth | 🟡 Moderate | Rapid user growth, but profitability not verified |
| Competitive Position | 🟢 Strong | Leading platform with top market share |
| Valuation Rationality | 🔴 Overvalued | P/B ratio of 48x, overdrawn future expectations |
Comprehensive Rating |
🟡 Hold |
Risks and opportunities coexist |
- Industry reshuffling speed: If 80% of small and medium players exit, after the competitive pattern stabilizes, user acquisition costs via paid traffic are expected to decrease
- User value conversion: Whether current user acquisition investments can be converted into long-term paying users and brand loyalty
- AI cost reduction effect: Whether technology investments can substantially reduce content production and user acquisition costs
- Cash flow management: Whether the company can maintain sufficient liquidity to support itself until the profit inflection point amid continuous losses
- The company is in a strategic investment period, and losses may further expand in the short term
- The asset-liability ratio has risen to 66.56%, so attention should be paid to debt repayment risks
- The sales expense ratio of 87% is significantly high, and the profit model has not been proven viable
- Intensified industry competition may lead to further deterioration of the input-output ratio
[1] Securities Times - “China Online: Losses Narrowed Significantly in Q4 2025, AI + Globalization Strategy Lays Foundation for Growth” (https://www.stcn.com/article/detail/3591758.html)
[2] The Paper - “China Online Increases Promotion Investment in Overseas Short Drama Business, Expects Net Loss to Expand by at Least 139% Last Year” (https://m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_32376468)
[3] Tide News - “China Online Loses RMB 700 Million in a Year, All Spent on Overseas Paid Traffic Acquisition” (https://tidenews.com.cn/tmh_news.html?id=6968f8d64ab6530001e882ce)
[4] Soochow Securities - “In-depth Report on the Media Industry: Overseas Short Dramas, More Than Just “Netflix Alternatives”” (https://pdf.dfcfw.com/pdf/H3_AP202507161709998001_1.pdf)
[5] ChinaVenture - “Overseas Short Dramas Change Landscape in 3 Years: 80% Losses, Players Lose Money for Exposure?” (https://m.chinaventure.com.cn/news/78-20251111-388805.html)
[0] Jinling AI Financial Database - Real-time Market and Financial Analysis of China Online (300364.SZ)
飞猪与阿里生态协同成效评估报告
中国社区生鲜行业竞争格局深度分析
Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.