Economic Comparative Analysis Report on Gas Heating vs. Electric Heating

#energy_cost_comparison #heating_systems #air_source_heat_pump #natural_gas_heating #electric_heating #energy_efficiency #household_energy
Neutral
A-Share
January 21, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Based on the latest 2025-2026 data I collected and in-depth analysis, here is a comprehensive economic comparative report on gas heating vs. electric heating:


Economic Comparative Analysis Report on Gas Heating vs. Electric Heating
I. Core Conclusions
Heating Method Winter Operating Cost (100 ㎡) Energy Efficiency Recommendation Rating
Air Source Heat Pump
~¥4,656 COP 3.0 (60-70% energy saving) ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Central Heating
~¥2,500 High centralized heating efficiency ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Gas Boiler
~¥7,822 ~88% ⭐⭐⭐⭐
Resistance Electric Heater
~¥14,856 ~100% ⭐⭐
Graphene Electric Heater
~¥15,168 ~98% ⭐⭐

II. Detailed Cost Analysis
1. Operating Cost Comparison (100 ㎡ Residence, 120-Day Heating Season)

According to analytical calculations [0]:

Gas Boiler Floor Heating:

  • Daily Gas Consumption: ~17.1 m³
  • Total Winter Gas Consumption: ~2,052 m³
  • Seasonal Cost:
    ¥7,822
  • Average Gas Price: ¥3.81/m³ (Tiered Gas Pricing)

Resistance Electric Heater/Baseboard Heater:

  • Daily Electricity Consumption: 150 kWh
  • Total Winter Electricity Consumption: 18,000 kWh
  • Seasonal Cost:
    ¥14,856
  • Average Electricity Price: ¥0.83/kWh (Tiered Electricity Pricing)

Air Source Heat Pump Floor Heating:

  • Daily Electricity Consumption: 50 kWh (COP=3.0)
  • Total Winter Electricity Consumption: 6,000 kWh
  • Seasonal Cost:
    ¥4,656
  • Energy Saving Effect: ~69% savings compared to resistance electric heaters

Graphene Electric Heater:

  • Daily Electricity Consumption: 153.1 kWh
  • Seasonal Cost:
    ¥15,168
  • Suitable for local heating; high cost for whole-house use
2. Cost Ratio Analysis

Taking gas heating as the baseline = 100%:

  • Gas Boiler: 100%
  • Resistance Electric Heater: 189.9% (
    90% more expensive than gas
    )
  • Air Source Heat Pump: 59.5% (
    40% cheaper than gas
    )
  • Graphene Electric Heater: 193.9% (
    94% more expensive than gas
    ) [0]

III. Analysis of Tiered Pricing Impact
Tiered Natural Gas Pricing (Taking Shijiazhuang as an Example) [1][2]
Tier Annual Gas Consumption Price
Tier 1 0-480 m³ ¥2.63-¥3.15/m³
Tier 2 480-660 m³ ¥3.09-¥3.25/m³
Tier 3 Above 660 m³ ¥3.90-¥4.06/m³
Residential Tiered Electricity Pricing (National Average) [1]
Tier Monthly Electricity Consumption Price
Tier 1 0-220 kWh ¥0.55-¥0.60/kWh
Tier 2 220-400 kWh ¥0.60/kWh
Tier 3 Above 400 kWh ¥0.85/kWh

Key Finding
: Under high electricity/gas consumption during the heating season, most households will move to Tier 2 or Tier 3, resulting in a significant increase in the actual unit price paid [1].


IV. Regional Difference Analysis
Cost Comparison Across Regions (100 ㎡) [2][3]
Region Central Heating Gas Self-Heating Air Source Heat Pump Electric Heater
North China (With Central Heating) ¥2,500 ¥7,822 ¥4,656 ¥14,856
North China (Without Central Heating) ¥7,822 ¥4,656 ¥14,856
East China ¥9,000 ¥5,200 ¥16,000
Central China ¥8,500 ¥4,900 ¥15,500

Special Situation in North China
: After the “coal-to-gas” transformation in rural areas such as Hebei, heating costs have soared from ¥2,000-¥3,000 (during the coal-burning period) to ¥5,000-¥11,340, and government subsidies have been reduced from ¥1 per cubic meter to ¥0.2 per cubic meter [2].


V. Equipment Thermal Efficiency Comparison
Equipment Type Thermal Efficiency Principle Explanation
Gas Boiler 85-90% Direct combustion heating with heat loss
Resistance Electric Heater ~100% Direct conversion of electricity to heat
Air Source Heat Pump
COP 2.5-4.0
“Moves” heat from air; 1 kWh of electricity produces 3 kWh of heat
Graphene Electric Heater ~98% High graphene electrothermal conversion efficiency, fast heating [3]

VI. Initial Installation Cost Comparison
Heating Method Initial Installation Cost
Gas Boiler + Floor Heating ¥15,000-¥25,000
Air Source Heat Pump Floor Heating ¥15,000-¥25,000
Baseboard Radiator ¥3,000-¥8,000
Mobile Graphene Electric Heater ¥500-¥3,000
Central Heating Connection Fee ¥5,000-¥15,000 [3]

VII. Investment Payback Period Analysis

Calculated based on a 15-year service life [0][3]:

  • Air Source Heat Pump vs. Gas Boiler
    : The air source heat pump saves approximately ¥3,166 annually; with similar initial investment, the cost difference can be recovered in about 6-7 years
  • Air Source Heat Pump vs. Resistance Electric Heater
    : Although the initial investment is ¥10,000 higher, it saves approximately ¥10,200 annually, and the investment can be recovered in 2 years

VIII. Practical Recommendations
1. Regional Selection Recommendations
  • Northern Regions with Central Heating
    : Prioritize central heating (lowest cost, good stability)
  • Self-Heating Households in North China
    : It is recommended to switch to air source heat pumps, which are more economical in the long run
  • Yangtze River Basin
    : Air source heat pumps are highly recommended due to high COP efficiency
  • Southern China (Short Winter Heating)
    : Local electric heaters or air conditioners can meet the demand
2. Equipment Selection Recommendations
Scenario Recommended Solution
Newly Renovated Households Air Source Heat Pump Floor Heating (most cost-effective in the long run)
Already Renovated Households Baseboard Radiators (low renovation cost)
Renting/Short-Term Use Mobile Electric Heaters (flexible and convenient)
Households with Elderly/Children Long-Term Hybrid Floor Heating + Radiator System
3. Energy Saving Tips
  • Utilize time-of-use electricity pricing: run at low temperature at night, maintain insulation during the day
  • Implement intelligent room-by-room temperature control; turn off heating in unoccupied rooms
  • Strengthen house insulation (double-glazed windows, weatherstripping)
  • Set a reasonable indoor temperature (18-20℃ is sufficient) [3]

IX. Conclusion

Economics Ranking
(From Highest to Lowest):

  1. Central Heating (Northern China) — Lowest Cost
  2. Air Source Heat Pump — Most cost-effective for long-term operation, 60-70% energy saving
  3. Gas Boiler — Moderate initial cost, but high operating cost
  4. Electric Heater Series — Low initial cost, but high operating cost

Core Conclusions
:

  • From a purely economic perspective,
    air source heat pumps
    are the current optimal choice; with a COP of 3.0, their operating cost is approximately
    69% lower
    than that of resistance electric heaters
  • In northern regions with central heating access, central heating remains the most economical option
  • Gas heating is still competitive in some regions, but it is greatly affected by tiered gas pricing, and its long-term cost is approximately
    40% higher
    than that of air source heat pumps
  • When choosing a heating method, comprehensive consideration should be given to regional climate, house insulation performance, usage habits, and initial investment capacity

References

[0] Calculation Results from Jinling AI Financial Analysis Tool (Based on 2025-2026 energy price data)

[1] Zunyi Development and Reform Commission Residential Electricity and Gas Pricing Standards (https://www.zunyi.gov.cn/)

[2] Field Survey “Residential Heating Difficulties in Rural Areas of North China” - Sohu News (https://m.sohu.com/a/973646214_121478296)

[3] Is Floor Heating Falling Out of Favor? Neighbor’s Solution: Fast Heating and Space-Saving - Tencent News (https://news.qq.com/rain/a/20260113A03QAN00)

[4] 2026 National Energy Work Conference Report (https://pdf.dfcfw.com/pdf/H3_AP202512221805625280_1.pdf)

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.