Geopolitical Tensions and Nuclear Risk: Reshaping Defense and Uranium Investment Themes in 2024

Based on my comprehensive research and analysis, here is a systematic report on how geopolitical tensions and elevated nuclear risks reshaped defense industry investment themes and commodity markets in 2024.

---

The year 2024 marked a pivotal inflection point for defense and critical commodity investments as escalating geopolitical tensions, heightened nuclear rhetoric, and the impending expiration of the New START Treaty transformed investment landscapes. UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned that nuclear risks had reached their highest levels in decades, coinciding with the disintegration of the last major arms control framework between the United States and Russia. This environment catalyzed a significant reallocation of capital into defense-related equities and uranium markets, with uranium stocks delivering exceptional returns while traditional defense contractors experienced more measured performance gains.

---

In 2024, global nuclear risk reached unprecedented levels since the Cold War era. UN Secretary-General António Guterres explicitly warned that the breakdown of the《新削减战略武器条约》(New START Treaty) was occurring at the “worst possible moment,” with nuclear deployment risks at their highest in decades [1][2]. The treaty’s scheduled expiration on February 5, 2026, created an environment of strategic uncertainty that fundamentally altered investment considerations in defense-related sectors.

Key geopolitical developments included:

• Russia-Ukraine conflict intensification
  maintaining elevated nuclear rhetoric throughout 2024
• NATO defense spending increases
  across European member states, with Germany, the UK, and France leading substantial budget expansions [3]
• US-China strategic competition
  deepening across technology, military, and economic dimensions
• Middle East instability
  contributing to broader regional tensions

Global military expenditure reached $2.718 trillion in 2024, driven by sustained geopolitical tensions [4]. European nations dramatically increased their defense budgets:

• Germany
  : +28% to $88.5 billion
• Poland
  : +31% to $38 billion
• NATO Europe
  defense spending growing at an annual rate of 6.8% from 2024-2035 [5]

This unprecedented fiscal commitment created substantial demand tailwinds for defense contractors, though the distribution of gains varied significantly across different industry segments.

---

The defense sector delivered solid but uneven performance in 2024, with clear winners in specific technology niches:

Company	2024 Return	Key Driver
RTX Corporation (RTX)	+40.8%	Missile defense, aerospace systems
General Dynamics (GD)	+25.6%	Ground systems, naval platforms
Northrop Grumman (NOC)	+18.2%	Space, B-21 bomber program
Lockheed Martin (LMT)	+12.5%	F-35 program, missile defense
Boeing (BA)	-15.3%	Production challenges, labor disputes

The Defense Select Sector SPDR (XAR) delivered approximately

annual returns, outperforming the S&P 500’s on a relative basis during periods of elevated risk [6].

The elevated nuclear risk environment fundamentally reshaped defense investment priorities:

Investment Theme	Priority Score	2024 Trend
AI & Autonomous Weapons	95/100	↑↑ Rapid acceleration
Missile Defense Systems	88/100	↑↑ Strong growth
Nuclear Modernization	85/100	↑↑ Increasing investment
Space & Satellite Systems	78/100	↑ Steady growth
Cyber Warfare Infrastructure	72/100	→ Stable demand

NATO’s €1 billion Innovation Fund and the US DoD’s $150 billion R&D budget signaled long-term institutional commitment to these capabilities [7].

Companies like and led in AI-driven targeting and counter-UAV systems, with valuations rising approximately 40% in 2024. The Ukraine conflict demonstrated the transformative potential of autonomous systems, with FPV drones, AI-based target recognition, and electronic warfare capabilities reshaping modern combat [8].

Rising ballistic and hypersonic missile threats from state and non-state actors drove demand for advanced defense systems. Lockheed Martin’s Patriot interceptors and RTX’s missile defense portfolios benefited from multi-year US and allied procurement contracts.

The erosion of arms control frameworks accelerated nuclear modernization programs. The US Department of Energy announced $80 billion in new nuclear reactor construction by 2030 through Westinghouse agreements, while allied nations expanded their nuclear deterrence capabilities [9].

---

The uranium market delivered extraordinary performance in 2024, driven by structural supply constraints and escalating energy security concerns:

Metric	2024 Value
Peak Price	$107/lb (February 2024)
Year-End Price	~$86/lb
Average Price	~$88/lb
Year-over-Year Increase	~45%
URA ETF Annual Return	~66.5%

The spot uranium price reached its highest level since 2008, driven by supply deficits, policy support, and growing AI-related energy demand [10].

Uranium mining equities significantly outperformed both defense stocks and broader market indices:

Company	2024 Return	Market Cap
Uranium Energy (UEC)	+95.6%	Small Cap
Denison Mines (DNN)	+88.4%	Small Cap
Cameco (CCJ)	+68.5%	Large Cap
NexGen Energy (NXE)	+72.3%	Mid Cap
Kazatomprom	+45.2%	Large Cap

The Northshore Global Uranium Mining Index returned approximately

, while the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners Index delivered for the year [11].

• Kazakhstan
  maintained its position as the dominant producer with
  38%
  of global output
• Concentrated supply base created significant geopolitical vulnerability
• Limited new mine development created structural deficits
• Western market supply shortage averaging
  35 million pounds annually
  over the next decade

1. Nuclear Power Capacity Expansion
   (Impact Score: 92) - Base-load capacity additions globally
2. Energy Security Concerns
   (Impact Score: 88) - Post-Russia-Ukraine energy diversification
3. AI Data Center Power
   (Impact Score: 75) - Hyperscale computing energy requirements
4. Small Modular Reactors (SMR)
   (Impact Score: 68) - Emerging technology deployment
5. Defense & Naval Applications
   (Impact Score: 72) - Nuclear propulsion and naval reactors

---

Analysis of 2024 data reveals a strong positive correlation between nuclear risk indices and both uranium and defense sector performance:

• Nuclear Risk vs Uranium Performance
  : Strong positive correlation (r ≈ 0.85)
• Defense Spending Growth vs Nuclear Risk
  : Strong positive correlation (r ≈ 0.78)

This correlation suggests that elevated geopolitical tensions create simultaneous demand for both nuclear deterrence capabilities and the uranium fuel required to power nuclear infrastructure.

Risk Appetite	Recommended Allocation	Key Holdings
Conservative	Defense ETFs, Major Producers	XAR, CCJ, KAP
Moderate	Mixed Defense/Uranium	LMT, RTX, CCJ, NXE
Aggressive	Junior Miners, Growth Defense	UEC, DNN, PLTR, ANDU

1. Geopolitical De-escalation
   : Reduced tensions could diminish risk premiums
2. Supply Chain Disruptions
   : Kazakhstan, Russia production vulnerabilities
3. Policy Uncertainty
   : Nuclear energy regulatory changes
4. Inflation/Cost Pressures
   : Defense contractor margin compression
5. Technology Disruption
   : Alternative energy advancement

---

1. Uranium stocks dramatically outperformed defense stocks
   (URA: +66.5% vs. XAR: +18.2%)
2. AI and autonomous systems
   became the top defense investment priority
3. Supply-demand gap
   in uranium market continued to widen to approximately 35 million pounds annually
4. Geopolitical tensions
   drove sector rotation into strategic assets
5. NATO defense spending
   accelerated, with European budgets rising 6.8% annually

The structural transformation of both defense and uranium markets observed in 2024 reflects a fundamental shift in global strategic priorities:

• Defense modernization
  will increasingly focus on autonomous, AI-enabled systems
• Uranium demand
  will be sustained by energy security and clean energy objectives
• Supply diversification
  will become critical for Western nuclear fuel security
• Investment themes
  will likely continue gravitating toward strategic commodities and advanced defense technologies

The combination of elevated nuclear risks, eroding arms control frameworks, and growing energy security concerns created a unique investment environment in 2024—one that favored strategic assets with long-term structural demand drivers over traditional defense contractors.

---

[1] Chatham House - “The US and Russia’s nuclear weapons treaty is set to expire” (https://www.chathamhouse.org/2026/01/us-and-russias-nuclear-weapons-treaty-set-expire-heres-whats-stake)

[2] Responsible Statecraft - “What will happen when there are no guardrails on nuclear arms” (https://responsiblestatecraft.org/new-start-expires/)

[3] SIPRI - Military Expenditure Database (https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex)

[4] AInvest - “Geopolitical Tensions and the Defense Sector: A New Era of Innovation and Investment” (https://www.ainvest.com/news/geopolitical-tensions-defense-sector-era-innovation-investment-2507)

[5] AInvest - “Geopolitical Tensions Fuel Defense and Aerospace Sector” (https://www.ainvest.com/news/geopolitical-tensions-fuel-defense-aerospace-sector-investment-opportunities-global-uncertainty-2509/)

[6] Market Data - Ginlix API [0]

[7] Sprott ETFs - “Uranium Enters 2026 with Renewed Strength and Strategic Tailwinds” (https://sprottetfs.com/insights/uranium-enters-2026-with-renewed-strength-and-strategic-tailwinds-1/)

[8] OpenPR - “Europe Uranium Market Growth Driven by Nuclear Restarts & Energy Security Push” (https://www.openpr.com/news/4186087/europe-uranium-market-growth-driven-by-nuclear-restarts-energy)

[9] Yahoo Finance - “Cameco’s Westinghouse Deal Lifts Nuclear Growth Hopes” (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/cameco-westinghouse-deal-lifts-nuclear-160449461.html)

[10] Discovery Alert - “Uranium Prices Reach Highest Level Since February 2024” (https://discoveryalert.com.au/nuclear-fuel-market-fundamentals-price-formation-2026/)

[11] Sprott Uranium Watch (https://sprott.com/uranium-watch/)