Yemen's New Government Formation and Geopolitical Risk Premiums in Middle East Energy Markets

Now I have comprehensive data to provide a systematic analysis of how Yemen’s new government formation could influence geopolitical risk premiums in Middle East energy markets.

---

Yemen’s formation of a new government on February 6, 2026, under Prime Minister Shaya al-Zindani represents a potentially significant development in the country’s fragmented political landscape [1][2]. Given Yemen’s strategic position bordering the Bab el-Mandeb Strait—one of the world’s most critical energy shipping chokepoints—this political development could have substantial implications for geopolitical risk premiums in Middle East energy markets. The formation occurs against a backdrop of cautious optimism in shipping markets, with war-risk insurance premiums having declined by 60% from their peak following the Israel-Hamas ceasefire, yet traffic through the Suez Canal remains approximately 60% below 2023 levels [3][4].

---

On February 6, 2026, Yemen’s Presidential Leadership Council issued Republican Decree No. (3) of 2026, announcing the formation of a new government under Prime Minister Shaya al-Zindani, who also serves as Minister of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates [1][2]. The cabinet comprises 34 ministers, including three women—a notable development representing increased gender representation in Yemen’s government. Key security appointments include Major General Ibrahim Ali Ahmed Haidan as Interior Minister and Lieutenant General Taher Ali Aida al-Aqili as Defense Minister [2].

Despite this new government formation, Yemen remains fundamentally divided between two parallel administrations:

• Internationally-recognized government
  based in Aden, controlling southern territories
• Houthi-controlled government
  based in Sanaa, dominating the north
• Southern Transitional Council (STC)
  actively pursuing independence for Southern Yemen

The Political Analysis Institute notes that the PLC operates as a “block of forces” with divergent goals, leading to persistent internal disagreements and weak governance since its establishment in April 2022 [5]. Recent clashes in December 2025-January 2026 saw the STC seize control of Hadhramaut and Al-Mahra before counter-operations with Saudi support recaptured these territories [5]. This ongoing fragmentation significantly constrains the new government’s capacity to exercise effective control over Yemen’s entire territory—including its critical maritime approaches.

---

The Bab el-Mandeb Strait—whose name translates to “Gate of Tears” in Arabic—represents one of the world’s most strategically significant waterways [6][7]. The strait connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and Arabian Sea, serving as the critical gateway for vessels traveling between Europe and Asia via the Suez Canal.

Metric	Value
Width at narrowest point	Approximately 30 kilometers (18.6 miles)
Percentage of global seaborne trade	~10%
Oil flows (pre-crisis)	5-6 million barrels per day
Container traffic on Red Sea-Suez route	~30% of total volume
Annual trade value	Approximately US$1 trillion

The strait handles a substantial portion of Middle Eastern oil exports destined for European and American markets. Goldman Sachs analysis indicates that oil flows through Bab el-Mandeb declined by approximately 45% in 2025 compared to 2023 levels, illustrating the vulnerability of this shipping corridor to regional conflicts [8]. Any disruption to this chokepoint forces vessels to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope, adding approximately 6,000 nautical miles, 3-4 weeks transit time, and $200,000-$300,000 in additional fuel costs per voyage [9].

---

Despite periods of reduced attacks following the Israel-Hamas ceasefire, the Houthi threat to maritime security remains a primary concern for energy markets. The Eurasia Review reports that the Red Sea remains “cautiously reopening” with major carriers including Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd gradually testing transits through Bab el-Mandeb and the Suez Canal [9]. However, the threat persists:

• Attack history
  : Over 170 attacks on US warships and 145 attacks on commercial vessels since 2023 [9]
• Notable incidents
  : Seizure of Galaxy Leader (November 2023), destruction of MV Magic Seas and MV Eternity C (July 2025) [9]
• Military deterrence
  : US, EU, and allied naval patrols continue operations including Operation Prosperity Guardian and Operation Aspides
• Cost of defense
  : US forces have expended over $1 billion defending commercial shipping [9]

The financial markets have developed sophisticated mechanisms for pricing geopolitical risk through war-risk insurance premiums:

Period	Premium Rate	Cost per $100M Vessel	Change
Pre-crisis (2023)	~0.30%	$300,000	Baseline
Peak crisis (2024)	~0.70-1.0%	$700,000-$1,000,000	+133-233%
Post-ceasefire (Dec 2025)	~0.20%	$200,000	-60% from peak

For a vessel valued at $100 million, the current war-risk premium of approximately 0.70% represents roughly $700,000 per Red Sea passage, excluding additional surcharges [4]. These premiums directly impact the economics of energy shipping, with higher costs ultimately reflected in energy prices for end consumers.

---

Energy economists utilize sophisticated probabilistic models to quantify geopolitical risk premiums embedded within petroleum pricing [10]. These frameworks combine multiple data inputs:

1. Risk Matrix Analysis
   : Assigns supply-impact weights (e.g., million barrels per day at risk) and economic-consequence scores (e.g., emergency reserve deployment potential)
2. Forward-Curve Embedding
   : Market prices incorporate risk premiums when futures markets rise ahead of physical supply disruptions
3. Insurance and Derivatives Signals
   : Rising shipping-route insurance costs and widening derivative spreads indicate heightened perceived risk

According to Goldman Sachs analysis, geopolitical risk premiums in oil markets typically range from 10-30% of baseline prices during periods of heightened tension [8][10]. Specific observations include:

• Current estimate
  : Approximately $10 per barrel geopolitical risk premium for Brent crude [8]
• Base case scenario
  : Brent declining to around $60/barrel assuming no supply disruptions
• Tail risk scenarios
  : Brent potentially spiking above $90/barrel with Iranian supply disruptions
• Worst-case scenarios
  : Prices could exceed $100/barrel with broader regional conflict affecting oil production or shipping

The timing of Brent crude rising above $70 per barrel coincided with escalating Iran-U.S. tensions rather than fundamental supply-demand rebalancing, demonstrating how risk premiums become embedded in forward pricing structures before any physical disruption occurs [10].

---

: A stable, internationally-recognized Yemeni government could:

• Improve coordination with Saudi Arabia and Gulf partners
• Enhance maritime security cooperation
• Potentially reduce Houthi influence or negotiate de-escalation
• Demonstrate commitment to GCC frameworks and regional stability

:

• War-risk insurance premiums could decline further from current ~0.70% toward pre-crisis levels of 0.30%
• Reduced uncertainty could narrow oil futures spreads
• Lower shipping costs could translate to modest decreases in energy prices
• Improved sentiment could attract investment in regional energy infrastructure

: – The new government’s composition suggests GCC alignment, but persistent fragmentation with the Houthi-controlled north limits effective control over maritime approaches.

: Yemen’s political fragmentation continues without significant change to the security environment:

• Houthi forces maintain control of northern territories and maritime access points
• Parallel government structure persists
• Naval deterrence continues to manage but not eliminate risk
• Commercial shipping gradually returns based on security conditions

:

• War-risk insurance premiums remain within a narrow band of 0.50-0.70%
• Oil risk premiums stabilize around $8-12 per barrel
• Shipping traffic slowly normalizes toward 70-80% of 2023 levels
• Energy markets price in continued but manageable geopolitical risk

: – Historical patterns suggest incremental improvement rather than transformational change in Yemen’s security situation.

: Political instability in Yemen escalates:

• STC independence movement gains momentum, creating additional conflict zones
• Houthi attacks resume or intensify
• Government fragmentation prevents effective security coordination
• Regional actors become more directly involved

:

• War-risk insurance premiums could spike back toward 1.0% or higher
• Oil risk premiums could increase by $5-15 per barrel
• Shipping companies may pause return to Red Sea routes
• Energy prices could rise reflecting supply chain disruption risks
• Capital expenditure for security measures increases breakeven thresholds for regional barrels

: – Recent clashes (December 2025-January 2026) demonstrate the potential for rapid escalation, but international attention and naval presence provide some stabilization pressure.

The influence of Yemen’s political development on energy risk premiums operates through several key channels:

1. Physical Supply Disruption Risk
   : Yemen’s proximity to Bab el-Mandeb means any conflict escalation directly threatens ~10% of global seaborne trade and 5-6 million barrels per day of oil flows [6][7]

2. Insurance Market Pricing
   : War-risk premiums react rapidly to political developments, with the 60% decline from peak levels directly attributable to ceasefire-related risk reduction [3][4]

3. Derivatives and Futures Markets
   : Risk premiums embedded in oil futures respond to perceived changes in geopolitical stability, often before physical disruptions occur [8][10]

4. Shipping Economics
   : The additional $200,000-$300,000 cost of Cape of Good Hope rerouting affects the economics of energy trade, with changes in political risk altering the risk-reward calculus for shipping companies [9]

5. Market Sentiment and Positioning
   : Energy traders adjust positions based on perceived changes in geopolitical risk, with fund flows into oil derivatives increasing during periods of heightened uncertainty

---

Market participants should watch the following indicators to assess how Yemen’s political development influences risk premiums:

Indicator	Direction of Risk Premium Impact
Houthi attack frequency	↑ Attacks = ↑ Premiums
War-risk insurance rates	↑ Rates = ↑ Premiums
Suez Canal traffic volume	↑ Volume = ↓ Premiums
Brent-WTI spread widening	↑ Spread = ↑ Premiums
Naval deployment changes	↓ Deterrence = ↑ Premiums
STC-government relations	↓ Stability = ↑ Premiums
GCC diplomatic activity	↑ Engagement = ↓ Premiums

---

Yemen’s new government formation on February 6, 2026, represents a potentially significant but uncertain development for geopolitical risk premiums in Middle East energy markets. While the new cabinet’s alignment with GCC frameworks and improved gender representation may signal positive intent toward regional stability, the fundamental political fragmentation persisting in Yemen—with parallel governments and active separatist movements—limits the capacity for immediate risk premium reduction.

:

1. Structural Constraints Remain
   : The new government faces substantial limitations in exercising control over Yemen’s maritime approaches, where Houthi forces maintain de facto control of northern territories adjacent to Bab el-Mandeb [5]

2. Risk Premiums Remain Elevated
   : Despite recent improvements in security conditions, war-risk insurance premiums of approximately 0.70% of vessel value remain more than double pre-crisis levels, and oil market geopolitical risk premiums of roughly $10 per barrel persist [3][4][8]

3. Cautious Market Response
   : The shipping industry’s gradual, measured return to Red Sea routes—with traffic remaining 60% below 2023 levels—reflects persistent uncertainty rather than confidence in fundamental risk reduction [3]

4. Multiple Transmission Mechanisms
   : Yemen’s political stability influences energy markets through physical supply disruption risk, insurance pricing, derivatives markets, shipping economics, and market sentiment

5. Scenario-Dependent Outcomes
   : Risk premium trajectories will depend heavily on whether the new government successfully coordinates with regional partners to enhance maritime security, maintains current conditions, or faces escalation of political-military conflict

: Energy market participants should maintain vigilance regarding Yemen’s political trajectory while recognizing that risk premiums in the Bab el-Mandeb corridor reflect a complex interplay of factors extending well beyond any single government formation. The current window of reduced hostilities provides an opportunity for normalization, but historical patterns suggest that structural risk premiums will likely persist until comprehensive political resolution is achieved.

---

[1] Anadolu Agency - “New Yemeni government formed under Shaya al-Zindani with 34 ministers” (https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/new-yemeni-government-formed-under-shaya-al-zindani-with-34-ministers/3822958)

[2] Yemen Online - “Republican Decree Announces Formation of the New Yemeni Government” (https://www.yemenonline.info/politics/11619)

[3] LinkedIn/Prosperity for People - “Suez Canal Traffic Still 60% Down Despite 100 Days Without Houthi Attacks” (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/suez-canal-traffic-still-60-down-despite-100-days-pplvf)

[4] USM Media - “The Suez Canal after the crisis: what carriers are preparing for in 2026” (https://en.usm.media/the-suez-canal-after-the-crisis-what-carriers-are-preparing-for-in-2026/)

[5] Journal of Neo-Colonial Studies - “The most important variables affecting the disintegration or unification of Yemen” (https://journal-neo.su/2026/02/04/the-most-important-variables-affecting-the-disintegration-or-unification-of-yemen/)

[6] GIZE PLC Facebook - “The Bab-el-Mandeb Strait—whose name means ‘Gate of Tears’” (https://www.facebook.com/GIZEPLCLikePage/videos/the-bab-el-mandeb-straitwhose-name-means-gate-of-tears-in-arabicis-one-of-the-mo/1403875014243456)

[7] Eurasia Review - “Red Sea Chokepoint: Geopolitics, Military Deterrence, And The Fragile Reopening Of A Global Trade Artery” (https://www.eurasiareview.com/25012026-red-sea-chokepoint-geopolitics-military-deterrence-and-the-fragile-reopening-of-a-global-trade-artery-analysis/)

[8] Oil & Gas 360 - “Goldman estimates geopolitical risk premium of around $10 per barrel for Brent after prices rise” (https://www.oilandgas360.com/goldman-estimates-geopolitical-risk-premium-of-around-10-per-barrel-for-brent-after-prices-rise/)

[9] Eurasia Review - “Red Sea Chokepoint: Geopolitics, Military Deterrence, And The Fragile Reopening Of A Global Trade Artery - Analysis” (https://www.eurasiareview.com/25012026-red-sea-chokepoint-geopolitics-military-deterrence-and-the-fragile-reopening-of-a-global-trade-artery-analysis/)

[10] Discovery Alert - “OPEC+ Production Plan Shapes Global Energy Markets” (https://discoveryalert.com.au/opec-production-plan-global-energy-market-2026/)