Geopolitical Risk Analysis: US-Iran Tensions and Global Oil Markets

---

Escalating tensions between the United States and Iran present a significant geopolitical risk factor for global oil markets and energy sector investments. President Trump’s recent warnings of “very painful” consequences if nuclear negotiations fail, combined with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s skepticism about potential agreements, have created an environment of heightened uncertainty [1][2]. This analysis examines the potential market impacts and investment implications across multiple scenarios.

---

The diplomatic situation between the United States and Iran remains tense, with negotiations conducted through Omani mediators having produced limited progress as of February 2026. Key developments include:

• February 2026
  : Fifth round of US-Iran negotiations held in Oman, with both sides maintaining hardline positions [2]
• February 5, 2026
  : President Trump warned Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that he “should be very worried” regarding nuclear program developments [2]
• February 11, 2026
  : President Trump met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House for approximately 2.5 hours, focusing specifically on Iran’s nuclear capabilities and regional threats [1]
• Israeli Concerns
  : Intelligence reports indicate Iran could possess 1,800-2,000 ballistic missiles “within weeks or months,” potentially overwhelming Israeli air defenses [3]

The United States has reinforced its military presence in the Middle East:

• Multiple naval assets positioned in the Persian Gulf region
• Enhanced air defense capabilities in regional allies
• Deployment considerations including potential second aircraft carrier group [4]

---

Oil markets have already begun incorporating geopolitical risk premiums into pricing structures:

Indicator	Current Level	Change (YTD)
WTI Crude	~$65-66/bbl	+3-4%
Brent Crude	~$69-70/bbl	+3-4%
XLE ETF	~$53-54	+24% (over 12 months)

According to UBS oil analyst Giovanni Staunovo, “ongoing tensions in the Middle East continue to support prices, although so far there has been no supply disruption” [4].

The Strait of Hormuz represents the most significant supply risk factor:

• Volume at Risk
  : Approximately 20% of global oil consumption passes through this waterway [5][6]
• Daily Transit
  : Historically 16-20 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil and condensate
• 2022-2024 Decline
  : Volumes declined by 1.6 million b/d during this period due to various factors [6]

Any disruption to Hormuz shipments would immediately tighten global supply balances and trigger significant price spikes.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) Oil Market Report for February 2026 provides context:

• Global Supply Growth
  : Projected to rise by 2.4 million b/d in 2026
• Inventory Build
  : Global stocks increased by 477 million barrels in 2025 (1.3 million b/d average) [7]
• OPEC+ Production
  : The group maintains current production agreement, with Russian output down ~0.6% in January [4]

The current oversupply environment provides a buffer against immediate disruptions, but escalating tensions could quickly reverse inventory builds.

---

: 30-40%
: $60-70/bbl (WTI)

Under this scenario, negotiations produce a framework agreement limiting Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. Markets would likely:

• Reduce geopolitical risk premium
• Maintain current supply-demand equilibrium
• Energy equities trade in line with broader market

: 35-45%
: $75-85/bbl (WTI)

If negotiations fail and military posturing intensifies:

• Iran threatens Hormuz disruption
• Insurance premiums for tankers increase
• Physical crude markets tighten immediately
• Strategic Petroleum Reserve releases may be considered
• Energy sector outperforms by 15-25%

: 15-20%
: $90-110+/bbl (WTI)

Direct military conflict would cause:

• Immediate Hormuz closure or severe disruption
• Iranian oil exports cease (currently ~2.5 million bpd)
• Global supply deficit of 3-4 million b/d
• Massive flight to safety into energy assets
• Severe economic slowdown implications

---

The Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) has demonstrated resilience:

Metric	Value
50-Day Moving Average	$50.82
200-Day Moving Average	$44.45
Period Change (Sept 2024-Feb 2026)	+24.03%
Correlation with WTI	Strong positive

• Integrated Majors
  : Exxon Mobil (XOM), Chevron (CVX) – balance sheet strength to weather volatility
• Independent Producers
  : ConocoPhillips (COP), EOG Resources (EOG) – production growth optionality
• Services Exposure
  : Halliburton (HAL), Schlumberger (SLB) – demand leverage if activity increases

1. Position Sizing
   : Energy allocation should reflect risk tolerance (5-15% typical)
2. Options Strategies
   : Consider protective puts on energy equity positions
3. Geographic Diversification
   : Balance US-focused names with international exposure

Risk Factor	Impact Level	Mitigation
Supply disruption	High	Long oil/energy positions
Demand destruction (recession)	Medium	Diversify across sectors
Regulatory changes	Medium	Focus on low-cost producers
Currency exposure (strong USD)	Low-Medium	Hedging strategies

---

:

• Status of US-Iran nuclear negotiations in Oman
• Iranian ballistic missile program developments
• Any military movements or incidents in Persian Gulf

:

• OPEC+ production policy decisions
• Summer driving season demand patterns
• Strategic Petroleum Reserve levels and potential releases

:

• Iran sanctions regime evolution
• Global energy transition investments
• Alternative supply developments (e.g., Guyana, LNG)

---

US-Iran tensions represent a material risk factor for global oil markets with significant implications for energy sector investments. While current oversupply conditions provide a buffer against immediate price spikes, the Strait of Hormuz’s critical role in global oil transport means that escalating tensions could quickly translate into higher prices and increased market volatility.

Investors should consider:

1. Maintaining moderate energy exposure
   (8-12% of portfolio) to benefit from potential upside
2. Diversifying within the sector
   across integrated majors, producers, and services
3. Implementing risk management
   through options strategies or stop-losses
4. Monitoring developments closely
   for rapid portfolio adjustments

The geopolitical risk premium currently embedded in oil prices ($3-5/bbl) may expand significantly if diplomatic efforts fail, making energy assets a potential hedge against broader portfolio volatility.

---

[1] Politico - “Trump continues to threaten Iran to come to deal after meeting with Netanyahu” (https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/11/trump-iran-threat-deal-netanyahu-00776718)

[2] CNN - “Iran: Trump confirms more talks as Tehran stands firm on nuclear…” (https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/06/middleeast/us-iran-oman-talks-explained-intl)

[3] Institute for the Study of War - “Iran Update, February 11, 2026” (https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-february-11-2026/)

[4] CNBC - “Oil rises more than 1% on US–Iran tensions, improved demand” (https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/11/oil-rises-2percent-on-usiran-tensions-improved-demand.html)

[5] Reuters - “Oil prices steady as Iran-US tensions and US data eyed” (https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/oil-drifts-lower-traders-weigh-supply-risks-amid-usiran-tensions-2026-02-10/)

[6] EIA - “Amid regional conflict, the Strait of Hormuz remains critical oil chokepoint” (https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=65504)

[7] IEA - “Oil Market Report - February 2026” (https://www.iea.org/reports/oil-market-report-february-2026)

[8] MarketWatch - “20 oil stocks passing a quality screen as investors wonder what Iran will do next” (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/20-oil-stocks-passing-a-quality-screen-as-investors-wonder-what-iran-will-do-next-71bf037e)