Proprietary Trading Firms: Insights on Multiple Accounts, Rules, and Industry Dynamics

Reddit Factors

Users split on prop firms: some label them predatory scams (e.g., ‘glorified paper trading with deception’) while others cite low-cost practice benefits.
Multiple accounts are used to avoid large drawdowns (3x50k accounts offer higher combined drawdown than one 150k) and scale profits via copy trading.
Concerns raised about unfair payout denials (e.g., Apex users reporting refusals) and rules designed to cause failure [12].

Research Findings

2025 prop firms expand retail funding: traders pass challenges for capital up to $1M+ with 80-85% profit splits [1].
Multiple accounts diversify risk, access more capital, and mitigate single-firm failure [6].
Rules (5-12% drawdown limits, profit targets) protect firm capital—high failure rates stem from strict requirements and challenge fee reliance [3].
Industry issues: fraud, firms failing within a year, technical risks from trade copiers [9, 10].

Synthesis

Reddit’s negative views align with research on fraud and payout risks, but research clarifies rules are not predatory.
Both agree multiple accounts enable scaling—Reddit examples match research’s diversification benefits.
Implications: Vet firms carefully (per [4]) and use trade copiers cautiously (per [10]).

Risks & Opportunities

Risks: Unfair payouts [12], fraud [9], technical failures [10].
Opportunities: Access to large capital without personal risk [1], low-cost practice [12], scaling profits [6].

Related Stocks