Analysis of the Effectiveness of Abnormal Volatility and Trading Suspension Verification Mechanisms for A-Share Small and Mid-Cap Stocks
Unlock More Features
Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
Related Stocks
Based on collected market data, company announcements, and regulatory information, I will provide you with a systematic analysis of abnormal volatility and the trading suspension verification mechanism for A-Share small and mid-cap stocks.
Fenglong Co., Ltd. (002931.SZ) experienced one of the most extreme consecutive daily price limit-up rallies in the A-Share market in recent years between December 25, 2025, and January 13, 2026. Its specific performance is as follows:
| Statistical Indicator | Data Performance |
|---|---|
| Consecutive Price Limit-Up Trading Days | 12 trading days |
| Cumulative Increase in the Period | 213.97% |
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 655.45x |
| Price-to-Book Ratio | 17.19x |
| Average Daily Turnover Rate | Significantly above normal levels |
From the company’s financial data, there were no major changes in its fundamentals in the first three quarters of 2025. The latest quarterly EPS was only $0.04, ROE was only 2.76%, and net profit margin was less than 5%, which stands in stark contrast to the stock price increase [0]. This is a typical reflection of price fluctuations driven by market sentiment rather than supported by fundamentals.
On the evening of January 13, 2026, Fenglong Co., Ltd. voluntarily issued a trading suspension verification announcement, whose key points include:
- The company’s main business has not changed, and daily operations are normal
- Clearly clarified that there are no restructuring plans with UBTECH, and there are no backdoor listing arrangements within the next 36 months
- Performance growth cannot support the current valuation level
- Risk of overheated market sentiment
- Risk of irrational speculation
- Risk of changes in the market competitive environment
- International trade risk
- Risk of substitution from the electrification transformation of garden machinery
The company warned that its latest price-to-book ratio is significantly higher than the industry average, and the stock price has obvious bubble characteristics.
According to data disclosed by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, between January 12 and 16, 2026, regulators adopted multi-level regulatory measures:
| Type of Regulatory Measure | Quantity | Main Targeted Behaviors |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Regulatory Oversight Measures | 387 cases |
Abnormal transactions such as intraday price manipulation and false declarations |
| Major Matter Verification | 15 cases |
Verification of information disclosure and transactions of listed companies |
| Reporting of Suspected Illegal and Irregular Clues | 5 cases |
Cases involving suspected market manipulation, etc. |
| Disciplinary Actions | 3 cases |
Violations of information disclosure and standardized operation |
| Regulatory Letters | 6 cases |
Violations of information disclosure and standardized operation |
The trading suspension verification mechanism has indeed produced an obvious “forced cooling” effect in the short term. Taking Fenglong Co., Ltd. as an example, the consecutive price limit-up trend was forcibly suspended during the trading suspension period, providing the market with a time window for information digestion and risk assessment.
However, the effectiveness of the mechanism has obvious limitations. Data shows:
- Guosheng Technology: Continued to hit price limit-ups after resumption of trading
- ST Chengchang: Continued to hit price limit-ups after resumption of trading, and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange had to take self-regulatory oversight measures to suspend investors’ trading
- China Satellite Communications Group: Still rose after risk warnings, and closed at the daily price limit-down on January 13
This phenomenon of “the more inspections, the more the price rises” shows that a single trading suspension verification is difficult to fundamentally curb speculative trading.
At the 2026 system work conference, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) clearly emphasized “firmly preventing sharp fluctuations in the market” and adopted comprehensive measures:
- The Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Beijing Stock Exchanges simultaneously raised the margin ratio for margin trading to 100%to reduce leverage
- Multiple companies simultaneously issued risk warnings to guide public opinion
- Adopted trading suspensionmeasures for abnormal trading accounts
The market at the start of 2026 showed obvious structural characteristics:
| Characteristic | Performance |
|---|---|
| Price Limit-Up Echelon | 2 stocks with 7 consecutive price limit-ups, 5 stocks with 6 consecutive price limit-ups |
| Hot Concepts | Commercial aerospace, AI applications, brain-computer interfaces, GEO |
| Involved Sectors | ChiNext Board, STAR Market, Small and Medium Enterprise Board |
| Nature of Capital | Driven by high-leverage margin trading funds |
Combined with the case of Fenglong Co., Ltd. and other cases in the same period, the systemic risks exposed by the abnormal volatility of small and mid-cap stocks include:
- Small floating share capital, large-scale trading can easily trigger sharp price fluctuations
- Relatively low participation of institutional investors, insufficient market pricing efficiency
- Traditional valuation indicators such as PE and PB are seriously distorted
- The “imagination premium” endowed by hot concepts lacks performance support
- Individual investors obtain information later than market main forces
- The cycle of theme speculation is short, and ordinary investors are easy to become “bag holders”
- ST Aowei has been locked in as the first stock delisted due to market capitalization in 2026
- A stock price below RMB 1 or a market capitalization below RMB 500 million for 20 consecutive days will trigger delisting
| Risk Level | Risk Type | Typical Performance | Response Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
Extremely High |
Risk of Being Trapped by Chasing High Prices | Buying at high prices after consecutive price limit-ups | Avoid chasing price limit-ups |
High |
Risk of Margin Call | Consecutive price limit-downs after buying on margin | Reduce leverage ratio |
High |
Delisting Risk | ST/*ST, stock price below RMB 1 | Stay away from problematic companies |
Medium |
Liquidity Risk | Unable to sell in a timely manner | Build positions in batches, diversify investments |
Medium |
Regulatory Risk | Account is suspended from trading | Standardize trading behaviors |
-
Be Alert to the “Price Limit-Up Effect”
- Consecutive price limit-ups are a warning signal of overheated market sentiment
- Statistically, chasing high prices results in negative returns in the long term
-
Verify Fundamental Matching Degree
- Whether the stock price increase matches the growth rate of revenue and profits
- Whether PE/PB seriously deviates from the industry average
-
Pay Attention to Regulatory Signals
- A company’s announcement of abnormal fluctuations = risk warning
- Focus on exchange inquiry letters and regulatory letters
| Recommended Item | Specific Operation |
|---|---|
| Position Management | No single stock accounts for more than 20% of the total position |
| Leverage Control | Margin trading ratio does not exceed 30% |
| Take-Profit and Stop-Loss | Set clear profit and loss target levels |
| Information Screening | Distinguish between facts and market rumors |
Fu Yifu, a special researcher at Suzhou Commercial Bank, pointed out that investors should “view theme concepts rationally and focus on the core value of the company”. Against the background that current regulation emphasizes “stability first”, the market style is expected to shift from a “frenzied bull market” to a “long-term bull market”, and performance certainty will become the main source of excess returns.
- Trigger Threshold May Be Too Low: Abnormal volatility is triggered by consecutive price limit-ups, but there may be reasonable factors for price increases in the market
- Limited Verification Depth: A 3-working-day verification period is difficult to complete a comprehensive investigation
- Lack of Supporting Measures After Resumption of Trading: A single trading suspension is difficult to form continuous constraints
| Optimization Direction | Specific Recommendations |
|---|---|
| Differentiated Regulation | Treat abnormal rises of high-quality stocks and speculation of poor-performance stocks differently |
| Investor Education | Strengthen the coverage and frequency of risk warnings |
| Trading Restrictions | Implement tiered restrictions on seriously abnormal accounts |
| Information Disclosure | Require companies to disclose the reasons for performance changes in more detail |
For investors,
- Respect the Market: Do not chase high prices after consecutive price limit-ups, and be alert to abnormal volume surges
- Focus on Value: Stock prices may deviate from fundamentals in the short term, but will inevitably return to them in the long term
- Risk Control: Set stop-loss levels, control positions, and stay away from leverage
- Compliant Trading: Avoid abnormal trading behaviors to prevent account regulation

[0] Jinling AI Financial Database - Fenglong Co., Ltd. (002931.SZ) Company Profile, Stock Price Data, Financial Analysis
[1] Beijing News - “First Seven Days of A-Shares: From "Consecutive Price Limit-Up" Frenzy to Trading Suspension Self-Inspection, Who is "Speculating Hot" and Who is "Cooling Down"?” (https://m.bjnews.com.cn/detail/1768314123129734.html)
[2] Sina Finance - “AI Blue-Chip Stock, Trading Suspension Verification! Multiple A-Shares, Urgent Risk Warnings!” (https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2026-01-15/doc-inhhiusf6551824.shtml)
[3] Securities Times - “Yidian Tianxia: Will Verify Stock Trading Fluctuations, Trading Suspension from the 15th” (https://www.stcn.com/article/detail/3593498.html)
[4] Eastmoney - “Shenzhen Stock Exchange: Took Self-Regulatory Oversight Measures for 387 Abnormal Securities Trading Behaviors This Week” (https://finance.eastmoney.com/a/202601163622098514.html)
[5] CNR Online - “Shenzhen Stock Exchange: Took Self-Regulatory Oversight Measures for 387 Abnormal Securities Trading Behaviors This Week” (https://finance.cnr.cn/ycbd/20260117/t20260117_527496485.shtml)
[6] Shanghai Stock Exchange - “China Securities Regulatory Commission Holds 2026 System Work Conference” (https://www.sse.com.cn/home/component/news/c/c_20260116_10805368.shtml)
[7] Xinhua Finance - “CNR Financial Review | Adhere to Stability First, A-Shares Need a "Long-Term Bull Market" Not a "Frenzied Bull Market"” (https://www.xincai.com/article/nhhqxtv4612371)
[8] Sohu - “New Trend of A-Shares! Regulators Take Frequent Actions, and the Number of Companies Prompting Trading Risks is Increasing” (https://m.sohu.com/a/978070862_121118712)
Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.