Impact of Sovereign Credit Rating Upgrade on Emerging Market Debt Investment Value and Geopolitical Risk Assessment

I will now compile a complete professional analysis report for you.

---

S&P Global upgraded Ukraine’s foreign currency credit rating from “CC” to “CCC+”, marking a marginal improvement in the country’s credit profile. However,

, with a 6-notch gap remaining from investment grade (BBB-). This rating adjustment is of important reference significance for emerging market debt investments, and investors need to establish a systematic analytical framework when evaluating such high-risk sovereign bonds.

---

includes ratings of BBB- and above across the three major rating agencies, specifically:

• Moody’s Rating System: Baa1, Baa2, Baa3 and above
• S&P/Fitch Rating System: BBB-, BBB, BBB+, A, AA, AAA

includes ratings of BB+ and below, with the following definitions:

• CCC: “Able to meet debt obligations currently, but highly dependent on sustained favorable business, economic, and financial conditions”
• CC: “Extremely high probability of default”
• C: “Default or a similar default process is imminent”
• D: “Default has occurred”

Rating Stage	Meaning	Upgrade Timing
D	Full default status	Early stage of the 2022 conflict outbreak
CC	One step away from default	Initial rating recovery phase
CCC+	Initial signs of improvement	Latest rating adjustment

This upgrade from CC to CCC+ indicates that rating agencies recognize the

in Ukraine’s debt profile, but it is crucial to clearly understand that , and default risk is still significant.

---

Sovereign credit rating upgrades typically have the following direct impacts on debt investment value:

: Rating upgrades tend to drive up bond prices and narrow yield spreads. Based on historical experience, major rating upgrades can lead to a 20-50 basis point narrowing of emerging market sovereign bond yields, but this magnitude may be more limited for CCC-rated bonds.

: As ratings improve, bonds become eligible for investment by a broader range of institutional investors. Investment-grade emerging market funds typically have clear rating threshold requirements; while CCC+ still does not meet their minimum standards, it has begun to fall within the investment scope of some high-yield funds.

: Improvements in sovereign ratings will be transmitted to the external financing costs of the country’s enterprises and financial institutions, reducing the overall debt burden of the economy.

:

• Dominated by hedge funds specializing in high-yield/distressed bonds
• Investors have high risk appetite, short investment horizons, and high tolerance for volatility
• Accounts for 60%-80% of outstanding bonds

:

• Begins to attract traditional high-yield funds with lower risk appetites
• Some balanced emerging market funds may add the bonds to their watchlists
• Institutional investors gradually develop allocation intentions but remain cautious

---

For sovereign bonds with high geopolitical risks, it is recommended to adopt the following systematic assessment framework:

Risk Dimension	Core Assessment Indicators	Recommended Weight
Geopolitical Conflict Risk	Border tensions, likelihood of military actions, sanction risks	20%
Political Stability	Frequency of government turnover, policy continuity, social unrest index	15%
External Support	Progress of IMF programs, multilateral institution assistance, bilateral loan commitments	15%
Economic Resilience	GDP growth outlook, adequacy of foreign exchange reserves, inflation level	15%
Debt Sustainability	Debt-to-GDP ratio, refinancing needs, fiscal balance	15%
Legal and Institutional Framework	Creditor rights protection, default history, restructuring experience	10%
Market Liquidity	Average daily trading volume, bid-ask spread, bond maturity distribution	10%

:

• Developments in UN and multilateral institution resolutions
• Changes in foreign policy positions of major countries
• Military deployment and exercise schedules
• Updates and implementation of sanction lists

:

• Implementation progress of IMF/World Bank programs
• Trend of changes in foreign exchange reserves
• Exchange rate volatility and capital flows
• Debt refinancing schedule and market sentiment

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                High-Risk Sovereign Bond Investment Decision Process                │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  Step 1: Assess Geopolitical Risk ──→ Is assessed conflict probability < 30%?        │
│         ↓ If No → Recommend avoidance                                  │
│  Step 2: Check Multilateral Support ──→ Is there an IMF/World Bank supported program?       │
│         ↓ If No → Recommend avoidance                                  │
│  Step 3: Analyze Debt Sustainability ──→ Is Debt-to-GDP Ratio < 150%?          │
│         ↓ If No → Exercise cautious assessment                                  │
│  Step 4: Evaluate Market Liquidity ──→ Is average daily trading volume > USD 50 million?     │
│         ↓ If too low → Reduce allocation ratio                                │
│  Step 5: Determine Final Allocation ──→ Decide investment ratio based on risk preference           │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

---

• Upside Path
  : End of conflict → Implementation of reforms → Enhanced IMF support → Gradual rating upgrades
• Downside Risks
  : Escalation of conflict → Interruption of aid → Difficulties in debt restructuring → Rating downgrade

: Moving from CCC+ to BBB- requires crossing 6 notches. Based on historical experience, each upgrade typically covers 1-2 notches, meaning at least 2-4 positive rating actions are required to reach the investment grade threshold.

Assessment Dimension	Score (1-5 Scale)	Explanation
Yield Attractiveness	5	Current yield is significantly higher than the emerging market average
Rating Upgrade Potential	4	Clear improvement path exists, dependent on key variables
Geopolitical Risk	1	Armed conflict persists, with extremely high uncertainty
Liquidity Risk	2	Limited trading volume, wide bid-ask spread
Exchange Rate Risk	3	Significant volatility in the Ukrainian hryvnia, currency exposure needs to be considered
Legal Risk	3	Uncertainty exists in debt restructuring negotiations
Overall Score	3/5	Classified as a high-risk, high-return opportunity

:

• Professional high-yield bond funds with high risk appetites
• Investors with long-term strategic interest in Ukraine
• Qualified investors capable of tolerating 30%-50% principal volatility
• Long-term capital with an investment horizon of 3 years or more

:

• Risk-averse individual investors
• Investors with short capital horizons (less than 2 years)
• Institutional investors with high liquidity requirements
• Investors unable to continuously track geopolitical developments

Portfolio Type	Recommended Allocation Cap	Investment Horizon	Notes
Conservative Portfolio	0%	Not applicable	Recommend avoidance
Balanced Portfolio	≤2%	3-5 years	Continuous monitoring required
Aggressive Portfolio	≤5%	5+ years	Stop-loss level must be set

---

1. Strict Position Control Principle
   : Exposure to a single high-risk country should not exceed 5% of the investment portfolio
2. Liquidity Priority Principle
   : Only invest in securities that can be held to maturity
3. Information Advantage Principle
   : Ensure continuous tracking capability for geopolitical developments
4. Stop-Loss Discipline Principle
   : Set a clear stop-loss level (e.g., 20% principal loss) and strictly enforce it
5. Diversification and Hedging Principle
   : Hedge geopolitical risk exposure through low-correlation assets

:

• Explicit support from international multilateral institutions (IMF, World Bank, regional development banks)
• Clear reform roadmap and timeline
• Diversified creditor base including official and private sectors
• Collective Action Clauses (CACs) included in bond terms
• Track record of successful restructuring after default

:

• Debt-to-GDP ratio exceeding 150% without a clear debt reduction plan
• Large-scale refinancing needs in the next 12 months
• Highly unstable political system
• Included in negative watchlists by major rating agencies
• Subject to significant international sanctions or asset freeze risks

:

• Conflict remains in a low-intensity stalemate
• International aid continues but is limited in scale
• Bond prices fluctuate within a range
• Expected annualized return: 5%-10%

:

• Ceasefire agreement or peace settlement reached for the conflict
• IMF expands aid scale
• Rating upgraded to B or BB
• Expected annualized return: 15%-30%

:

• Conflict escalates or becomes prolonged
• Western aid is reduced or interrupted
• Debt default or restructuring deadlock occurs
• Expected annualized return: -30% to -50%

---

• Geopolitical Breakthrough
  : Ceasefire agreement or peace settlement reached by conflicting parties
• Enhanced International Support
  : IMF approves a larger-scale aid program or additional fiscal commitments from G7 countries are secured
• Sequential Rating Upgrades
  : Fitch or Moody’s follows with an upgrade, or S&P further upgrades to B
• Successful Debt Restructuring
  : Restructuring agreement reached with private creditors, restoring normal debt servicing arrangements
• Reform Progress
  : Substantial breakthrough achieved in Ukraine’s EU accession process

• Geopolitical Deterioration
  : Conflict significantly escalates or spreads to a wider region
• Aid Interruption
  : The U.S. or EU reduces or suspends fiscal support for Ukraine
• Debt Default
  : Failure to make timely payments or breakdown of debt restructuring negotiations
• Economic Deterioration
  : Sharp GDP decline, runaway inflation, or currency crisis
• Sanctions Backlash
  : Sanctions against Russia have spillover negative impacts on Ukraine’s economy

---

S&P Global’s upgrade of Ukraine’s credit rating from CC to CCC+ is a

signal. Investors should:

1. Recognize the limitations of the rating upgrade
   : CCC+ remains in the lowest tier of speculative grade, with a significant gap to investment grade, and credit risk is still substantial.

2. Establish a systematic assessment framework
   : Adopt a multi-dimensional risk assessment approach that comprehensively considers geopolitics, economic fundamentals, debt sustainability, and external support.

3. Adhere to strict position management
   : Even under optimistic scenarios, exposure to a single country should not exceed 5% of the investment portfolio.

4. Maintain dynamic monitoring and flexible adjustments
   : Geopolitical risks are highly uncertain, and investors need to establish a rapid response mechanism.

5. Set a clear exit strategy
   : Predefine trigger points based on different scenarios, including target returns, key events, and stop-loss levels.

The chart above displays a six-dimensional risk assessment radar chart for Ukrainian sovereign bonds and the investment decision-making process for high-risk sovereign bonds, for reference in investment decisions.

---

: Jinling AI Financial Analysis System
: January 23, 2026
: This report is for investment reference only and does not constitute specific investment advice. Investors should make independent investment decisions based on their own risk tolerance.