Analysis of the Impact of Space Computing Infrastructure Construction on Investment in the Satellite Internet and Computing Network Industry Chains

#space_computing #satellite_internet #computing_network #investment_analysis #industry_chain #satellite_communication #beidou #a_shares_tech
Positive
A-Share
January 23, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

002151.SZ
--
002151.SZ
--
002465.SZ
--
002465.SZ
--
300045.SZ
--
300045.SZ
--
300383.SZ
--
300383.SZ
--
300036.SZ
--
300036.SZ
--

Based on collected data and market information, I have prepared this in-depth investment analysis report.


Analysis of the Impact of Space Computing Infrastructure Construction on Investment in the Satellite Internet and Computing Network Industry Chains
I. Industry Background and Strategic Significance
1.1 Strategic Positioning of Space Computing Infrastructure

According to the information provided, the China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (CAICT) will hold the “Star Computing · Smart Connect” Space Computing Symposium on January 26, 2026, and release the “Computing Star Network” Joint Promotion Initiative and Forward-looking Research Report on Space Computing Development (2026). This initiative marks the accelerated advancement phase of China’s strategic layout for the integrated development of space-air information and intelligent computing [0].

The construction of space computing infrastructure represents the core direction of next-generation information infrastructure, and its strategic significance is reflected in the following three dimensions:

Technology Integration Dimension
: Space computing extends ground-based computing networks to the space domain, achieving full coverage of the “space-air-ground integrated” computing network. Guoxing Aerospace’s “Star Computing Program” and Zhijiang Laboratory’s “Three-Body Computing Constellation” are concrete practices of this technical path [0].

Industrial Restructuring Dimension
: Traditional satellite internet mainly provides communication connection services, while space computing infrastructure will endow satellite networks with computing capabilities, realizing a qualitative change from “information transmission” to “information processing”, significantly improving data processing efficiency and reducing latency.

Security and Independence Dimension
: The participation of the Beijing Institute of Spacecraft System Engineering in the development outlook of space digital intelligence infrastructure indicates national-level strategic emphasis on space computing, which is conducive to building an independent and controllable space-air information system [0].

1.2 Paradigm Shift in Industry Chain Investment Logic

The construction of space computing infrastructure will reshape the investment logic of the satellite internet and computing network industry chains, mainly reflected in the following aspects:

Valuation System Restructuring
: Traditional satellite concept stock valuations are mainly based on “quantitative” indicators such as user numbers and satellite launch quantities. With the introduction of space computing, new “qualitative” evaluation dimensions such as “computing scale”, “computing efficiency”, and “edge processing capabilities” will be added [0].

Expansion of Investment Targets
: In addition to traditional satellite manufacturing and communication operation enterprises, new investment opportunities will emerge in segmented fields such as space computing chips, space edge servers, and inter-satellite laser communications.

Industry Chain Value Migration
: The value chain will shift from the current “constellation construction → terminal equipment → operation services” to the new value chain of “computing satellites → space computing → intelligent applications” [0].


II. Core Content of the “Computing Star Network” Program and Analysis of Participating Institutions
2.1 Technical Positioning of the Three Key Participating Institutions

According to the information provided, the core participating institutions of the “Computing Star Network” program and their technical positioning are as follows:

Institution Technical Direction Core Capabilities Industrial Impact
Guoxing Aerospace
“Star Computing Program” Satellite payload integration, on-satellite computing Promotes the evolution of satellites from communication payloads to computing payloads
Zhijiang Laboratory
“Three-Body Computing Constellation” Distributed space computing architecture Constructs a space-based distributed computing network system
Beijing Institute of Spacecraft System Engineering
Space Digital Intelligence Infrastructure Overall design and system integration Ensures technical route coordination and standard formulation
2.2 Technical Architecture and Development Path

Guoxing Aerospace’s “Star Computing Program”
: This program focuses on integrating artificial intelligence computing capabilities into low-Earth orbit satellite payloads to realize real-time on-satellite data processing. According to industry technological evolution rules, computing satellites need to address three core technical challenges: space environment adaptation, power consumption control, and thermal management [0].

Zhijiang Laboratory’s “Three-Body Computing Constellation”
: The name “Three-Body” suggests that its architectural design draws on the distributed collaboration idea of the three-body problem, realizing computing resource sharing and task scheduling optimization through multi-satellite collaboration. This technical path is expected to break through the computing ceiling of single satellites [0].

Participation of the Beijing Institute of Spacecraft System Engineering
: Indicates that the “Computing Star Network” program has been incorporated into the national aerospace engineering system, which is conducive to accelerating technology verification and industrialization processes [0].


III. Industry Chain Investment Opportunities and Analysis of Concept Stock Performance
3.1 Sorting of Industry Chain Segments

The construction of space computing infrastructure will drive investment in the following industry chain segments:

Space Computing Infrastructure Industry Chain
├── Upper Stream: Satellite Manufacturing and Launch
│   ├── Satellite Platforms (Aerospace Power, Aerospace Electronics, etc.)
│   └── Launch Services (Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation, Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation, etc.)
├── Mid Stream: Core Space Computing Hardware
│   ├── Space-Grade Chips (Computing Chips, Memory Chips)
│   ├── On-Satellite Computing Equipment (Edge Servers, FPGAs)
│   └── Energy Systems (Solar Cells, Energy Storage Devices)
├── Lower Stream: Applications and Services
│   ├── Real-Time Remote Sensing Processing
│   ├── Space AI Inference
│   └── Space-Air-Ground Integrated Communications
└ Supporting Links
    ├── Ground Station Network
    ├── Frequency and Orbit Resources
    └── Operation Management Platform
3.2 Analysis of Core Concept Stock Market Performance

Based on market data from December 2025 to January 2026, I have conducted a quantitative analysis of major concept stocks [0]:

Stock Code Company Name Industry Initial Price End Price Interval Increase Daily Volatility Market Capitalization (USD Million)
002151.SZ BDStar Satellite Navigation $30.82 $47.54
+54.25%
5.16% 27,000
002465.SZ Haige Communication Satellite Communication $12.12 $18.29
+50.91%
5.30% 48,620
300045.SZ Huali Chuangtong Satellite Applications $22.90 $29.00
+26.64%
4.95% 20,520
300383.SZ Halo New Network Computing Network $12.75 $14.38
+12.78%
2.59% 26,030
300036.SZ Supermap Software Geographic Information $18.57 $19.09
+2.80%
2.40% 9,970

Key Findings:

  1. Satellite Navigation and Communication Sectors Perform Strongest
    : BDStar (+54.25%) and Haige Communication (+50.91%) lead in gains, reflecting positive market expectations for satellite infrastructure construction [0].

  2. High Volatility Accompanies High Returns
    : The daily volatility of the satellite sector ranges from 4.95% to 5.30%, significantly higher than the market average, reflecting thematic investment characteristics [0].

  3. Computing Network Sector is Relatively Stable
    : As a representative of the computing network sector, Halo New Network has a 12.78% increase, which is lower than that of the satellite sector, but its volatility is only 2.59%, reflecting stronger defensive attributes [0].

  4. Valuation Differentiation is Obvious
    : The satellite sector is generally loss-making (negative price-to-earnings ratio), while Halo New Network enjoys a price-to-earnings ratio of 160.89 due to its profitability [0].

3.3 Analysis of Yield and Risk Characteristics

Return and Volatility Comparative Analysis

The above chart shows the core investment characteristics of space computing infrastructure concept stocks:

Return Dimension
: The interval returns of the satellite navigation and communication sectors significantly outperform the market benchmark. The excess returns of Haige Communication and BDStar are particularly prominent, with cumulative increases of 50.91% and 54.25% respectively from December 2025 to January 2026 [0].

Risk Dimension
: The daily volatilities of these two high-return stocks are 5.30% and 5.16% respectively, making them high-beta targets. In contrast, Halo New Network and Supermap Software have volatilities controlled within the 2.4%-2.6% range, suitable for investors with lower risk appetites [0].

Valuation Differentiation
: The satellite sector is generally in a loss-making state due to its early-stage investment phase (negative price-to-earnings ratio). Halo New Network enjoys a relatively high valuation premium due to its profitability [0].


IV. Valuation Logic Reshaping and Investment Framework Reconstruction
4.1 Limitations of Traditional Valuation Frameworks

Traditional satellite internet concept stock valuations mainly rely on the following indicators:

  • User Scale and Growth
    : Benchmarked against Starlink, valuation is positively correlated with potential user numbers
  • Satellite Launch Quantity
    : Constellation scale as a core growth indicator
  • ARPU Value
    : Revenue contribution per user

However, the introduction of space computing infrastructure will break through the limitations of the above framework:

  1. Reassessment of Computing Value
    : In addition to providing communication connections, satellites will also provide computing services, requiring the introduction of new indicators such as “computing power - GOPS” and “energy efficiency - TOPS/W” [0].

  2. Expansion of Application Scenarios
    : Extending from broadband access to high-value scenarios such as real-time remote sensing processing, space AI inference, and space scientific computing [0].

  3. Business Model Innovation
    : Shifting from traffic-based charging to computing service-based charging, which may generate new models such as subscription and on-demand payment.

4.2 Construction of a New Valuation Framework

It is recommended to adopt a new “three-dimension, six-indicator” valuation framework:

Dimension Core Indicator Evaluation Content Suggested Weight
Computing Scale
In-orbit Computing Power (GOPS) Total computing power scale of satellite clusters 25%
Computing Density (GOPS/kg) Computing power density per unit mass 15%
Technological Leadership
On-Satellite Processing Capability Real-time processing latency, throughput rate 20%
Energy Efficiency Ratio TOPS/W, GOPS/W 15%
Commercial Implementation
Customer Expansion Number of industry customers, contract amount 15%
Revenue Growth Growth rate of computing service revenue 10%
4.3 Investment Implications of Valuation Logic Shift

Short-term (1-2 quarters)
: The market mainly reflects thematic expectations, and satellite manufacturing and launch enterprises will benefit first from the growth in constellation construction orders. It is recommended to focus on core targets such as Haige Communication (satellite communication) and BDStar (satellite navigation) [0].

Medium-term (2-4 quarters)
: With the advancement of technology verification such as the “Star Computing Program”, enterprises engaged in space computing hardware will enter a period of valuation restructuring. It is recommended to focus on enterprises with technical reserves in on-satellite computing [0].

Long-term (1-3 years)
: The implementation of application scenarios will determine the value distribution of the industry chain. It is recommended to proactively lay out potential enterprises in vertical application fields such as remote sensing processing and AI inference [0].


V. Investment Recommendations and Risk Warnings
5.1 Industry Allocation Recommendations

Based on the above analysis, it is recommended to adopt a “Core + Satellite” allocation strategy:

Core Allocation (60%)
:

  • Haige Communication (002465.SZ)
    : Leading enterprise in satellite communication, benefiting from accelerated constellation construction. The company posted an interval increase of 50.91% from December 2025 to January 2026, with high market attention [0].
  • BDStar (002151.SZ)
    : Core target in satellite navigation with high technical barriers. The interval increase is 54.25%, with high elasticity [0].

Satellite Allocation (40%)
:

  • Halo New Network (300383.SZ)
    : Representative target in computing networks with high performance certainty. The interval increase is 12.78%, with a volatility of only 2.59% [0].
  • Huali Chuangtong (300045.SZ)
    : In the satellite application field, with a pure thematic concept. The interval increase is 26.64% [0].
5.2 Catalyst Event Sorting
Time Event Impact
January 26, 2026 “Star Computing · Smart Connect” Space Computing Symposium Clarification of technical routes, accelerated industrial collaboration
Q1 2026 Progress of Guoxing Aerospace’s “Star Computing Program” Technology verification of computing satellites
H1 2026 Release of Zhijiang Laboratory’s “Three-Body Computing Constellation” Implementation of distributed space computing concept
2026 Full Year Satellite Internet Constellation Launch Plan Exceeding expectations in constellation construction progress
5.3 Risk Factors
  1. Technical Risk
    : Space computing technology is still in the verification phase, with technical risks such as launch failure and in-orbit malfunction.

  2. Policy Risk
    : Policy factors such as satellite frequency and orbit resource allocation and international coordination may affect the progress of constellation construction.

  3. Market Risk
    : Thematic investment is highly volatile, and there may be significant short-term pullbacks.

  4. Competition Risk
    : The rapid progress of international competitors such as SpaceX Starlink may exert pressure on the domestic industry chain.


VI. Conclusion

The construction of space computing infrastructure marks the entry of satellite internet from the “Connection Era” to the “Computing Era”, which will profoundly reshape the investment logic of the industry chain. The convening of the “Star Computing · Smart Connect” Symposium by CAICT and the release of the “Computing Star Network” Joint Promotion Initiative provide policy support and directional guidance for this industrial transformation [0].

From a market performance perspective, the satellite navigation and communication sectors have responded first, with the strong performance of BDStar (+54.25%) and Haige Communication (+50.91%) reflecting market recognition of this theme [0]. With technological verification and commercialization advancement, downstream industry chain links such as space computing hardware and application services are expected to face valuation restructuring opportunities.

It is recommended that investors pay close attention to the results released at the symposium on January 26, 2026, grasp the industrial investment opportunities brought by the “Computing Star Network” program, and pay attention to key nodes such as technology verification progress and commercial implementation timelines [0].


References

[0] Jinling AI Financial Database - Real-time Market Data, Technical Analysis and Financial Data (as of January 22, 2026)

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.